logo

SCIENCE CHINA Information Sciences, Volume 55, Issue 8: 1722-1754(2012) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-012-4633-4

Sparse microwave imaging: Principles and applications

More info
  • AcceptedJun 11, 2012
  • PublishedJul 6, 2012

Abstract

This paper provides principles and applications of the sparse microwave imaging theory and technology. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is an important method of modern remote sensing. During decades microwave imaging technology has achieved remarkable progress in the system performance of microwave imaging technology, and at the same time encountered increasing complexity in system implementation. The sparse microwave imaging introduces the sparse signal processing theory to radar imaging to obtain new theory, new system and new methodology of microwave imaging. Based on classical SAR imaging model and fundamental theories of sparse signal processing, we can derive the model of sparse microwave imaging, which is a sparse measurement and recovery problem and can be solved with various algorithms. There exist several fundamental points that must be considered in the efforts of applying sparse signal processing to radar imaging, including sparse representation, measurement matrix construction, unambiguity reconstruction and performance evaluation. Based on these considerations, the sparse signal processing could be successfully applied to radar imaging, and achieve benefits in several aspects, including improvement of image quality, reduction of data amount for sparse scene and enhancement of system performance. The sparse signal processing has also been applied in several specific radar imaging applications.


References

[1] Curlander J C, McDonough R N. Synthetic Aperture Radar: Systems and Signal Processing. New York: Wiley, 1991. CrossRef Google Scholar

[2] Henderson F M, Lewis A J. Principles and applications of imaging radar. In: Manual of Remote Sensing. New York:John Wiley and Sons, 1998. Google Scholar

[3] Wiley C, Ariz P. Pulsed Doppler Radar Methods and Apparatus. US Patent 3,196,436. 1965. CrossRef Google Scholar

[4] Wiley C A. Synthetic aperture radars: a paradigm for technology evolution. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 1985:21: 440–443. Google Scholar

[5] Wikipedia. Synthetic Aperture Radar. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic aperture radar. Google Scholar

[6] NASA. Missions–Seasat 1.. Google Scholar

[7] Jordan R L. The Seasat-A synthetic aperture radar system. IEEE J Ocean Eng, 1980, 5: 154–164. CrossRef Google Scholar

[8] CSA. CSA: RadarSat-1.. Google Scholar

[9] DLR. TerraSAR-X-Germany’s radar eye in space.. Google Scholar

[10] Jakowatz C V,Wahl D E, Eichel P H, et al. Spotlight-Mode Synthetic Aperture Radar: A Signal Processing Approach.Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996. Google Scholar

[11] Massonnet D, Souyris J C. Imaging with Synthetic Aperture Radar. Lausanne: EFPL Press, 2008. CrossRef Google Scholar

[12] Brown W M, Porcello L J. An introduction to synthetic-aperture radar. IEEE Spectrum, 1969, 6: 52–62. Google Scholar

[13] Sherwin C W, Ruina J P, Rawcliffe R D. Some early developments in synthetic aperture radar systems. IRE Trans Military Electron, 1962, 1051: 111–115. Google Scholar

[14] Moore G E. Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electron Mag, 1998, 86: 82–85. Google Scholar

[15] Woodward P M. Probability and Information Theory, with Application to Radar. New York: Pergamon, 1953. Google Scholar

[16] Cook C E, Bernfeld M. Radar Signals-An Introduction to Theory and Application. Norwood: Artech House, 1993. Google Scholar

[17] Nyquist H. Certain topics in telegraph transmission theory. Trans Amer Inst Electr Engin, 1928, 47: 617–644. CrossRef Google Scholar

[18] Shannon C E. Communication in the presence of noise. Proc IRE, 1949, 37: 10–21. Google Scholar

[19] Baraniuk R G, Candès E, Elad M, et al. Applications of sparse representation and compressive sensing. Proc IEEE,2010, 98: 906–09. CrossRef Google Scholar

[20] Russell B. History of Western Philosophy. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1946. Google Scholar

[21] Donoho D L. Compressed Sensing. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 2006. 52: 1289–1306. CrossRef Google Scholar

[22] Candès E J, Tao T. Near-optimal signal recovery from random projections: Universal encoding strategies? IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 2006, 52: 5406–5425. CrossRef Google Scholar

[23] Candès E J, Romberg J K, Tao T. Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements. Commun Pure Appl Math, 2006, 59: 1207–1223. CrossRef Google Scholar

[24] Mallat S, Yu G. Super-resolution with sparse mixing estimators. IEEE Trans Image Process, 2010, 19: 2889–2900. CrossRef Google Scholar

[25] Zhang Y, Mei S, Chen Q, et al. A novel image/video coding method based on compressed sensing theory. In: Proc of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Las Vegas, 2008. 1361–1364. Google Scholar

[26] Berger C R, Zhou S, Preisig J, et al. Sparse channel estimation for multicarrier underwater acoustic communication: from subspace methods to compressed sensing. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2010, 58: 1708–1721. CrossRef Google Scholar

[27] Baraniuk R, Steeghs P. Compressive radar imaging. In: Proc of IEEE Radar Conference, Boston, 2007. 128–133. Google Scholar

[28] Patel V M, Easley G R, Healy D, et al. Compressed synthetic aperture radar. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process, 2010,4: 244–254. CrossRef Google Scholar

[29] Ender J H G. On compressive sensing applied to radar. Signal Process, 2010, 90: 1402–1414. CrossRef Google Scholar

[30] Wu Y R. Studies on theory, system, and methodology of Sparse Microwave Imaging. Statement Tasks and Project Plan of 973 Program: 2009. CrossRef Google Scholar

[31] Cumming I G, Wong F H. Digital Signal Processing of Synthetic Aperture Radar Data: Algorithms and Implementation. Norwood: Artech House, 2004. Google Scholar

[32] Raney R K, Runge H, Bamler R, et al. Precision SAR processing using chirp scaling. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 1994, 32: 786–799. CrossRef Google Scholar

[33] Bamler R. A comparison of range-Doppler and wavenumber domain SAR focusing algorithms. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 1992, 30: 706–713. CrossRef Google Scholar

[34] Basu S, Bresler Y. O(N2 log2 N) filtered backprojection reconstruction algorithm for tomography. IEEE Trans Image Process, 2000, 9: 1760–1773. CrossRef Google Scholar

[35] Xiao S, Munson Jr D C, Basu S, et al. An N2 log2 N back-projection algorithm for SAR image formation. In: Conference Record of Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ACSSC), Pacific Grove, 2000. Google Scholar

[36] Suess M, Grafm¨uller B, Zahn R. A novel high resolution, wide swath SAR system. In: Proc of IEEE International Geoscience and Remoye Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Sydney, 2001. 1013–1015. Google Scholar

[37] Suess M. Side-Looking Synthetic Aperture Radar System. European Patent 1,241,487. 2006. CrossRef Google Scholar

[38] Currie A, Brown M A. Wide-swath SAR. IEE Proc F Radar Signal Process, 1992, 139: 122–135. CrossRef Google Scholar

[39] Elad M. Sparse and Redundant Representations: From Theory to Applications in Signal and Image Processing. New York: Springer, 2010. Google Scholar

[40] Mallat S G, Zhang Z. Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 1993, 41:3397–3415. CrossRef Google Scholar

[41] Chen S S, Donoho D L, Saunders M A. Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit. SIAM J Sci Comput, 1999, 20: 33–61. Google Scholar

[42] Candès E J, Tao T. Decoding by linear programming. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 2005, 51: 4203–4215. CrossRef Google Scholar

[43] Candès E, Tao T. The Dantzig selector: Statistical estimation when p is much larger than n. The Annal Stat, 2007,35: 2313–2351. CrossRef Google Scholar

[44] Candès E J, Romberg J, Tao T. Robust uncertainty principles: Exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 2006, 52: 489–509. CrossRef Google Scholar

[45] Candès E, Romberg J. Sparsity and incoherence in compressive sampling. Inverse Problem, 2007, 23: 969–985. CrossRef Google Scholar

[46] Tsaig Y, Donoho D L. Extensions of compressed sensing. Signal Process, 2006, 86: 549–571. CrossRef Google Scholar

[47] Baraniuk R G. More is less: Signal processing and the data deluge. Science, 2011, 331: 717–719. CrossRef Google Scholar

[48] Baron D, Wakin M B, Duarte M F, et al. Distributed Compressed Sensing. Technical Report. Rice: Rice University,2005,. Google Scholar

[49] Duarte M F, Sarvotham S, Baron D, et al. Distributed compressed sensing of jointly sparse signals. In: Conference Record of Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ACSSC), Pacific Grove, 2005. 1537–1541. CrossRef Google Scholar

[50] Zhang Z, Zhang B C, Hong W, et al. Waveform design for Lq regularization based radar imaging and an approach to radar imaging with non-moving platform. In: Proc of European Conference on Synthetic Aperture Radar (EuSAR), Nuremberg, 2012. CrossRef Google Scholar

[51] Ahmed N, Natarajan T, Rao K R. Discrete cosine transform. IEEE Trans Comput, 1974, 100: 90–93. Google Scholar

[52] Daubechies I. Ten Lectures on Wavelets. Philadelphia: SIAM Publications, 2006. Google Scholar

[53] Ron A, Shen Z. Affine systems in L2(d): the analysis of the Analysis operator. J Function Analys, 1997,148: 408–447. CrossRef Google Scholar

[54] Velisavljevic V, Dragotti P L, Vetterli M. Directional wavelet transforms and frames. In: Proc of Int Conf Image Processing, Rochester, 2002. 589–592. Google Scholar

[55] Candès E J. Curvelets: A Surprisingly Effective Nonadaptive Representation for Objects with Edges. Technical Report. DTIC Document, 2000. www.curvelet.org/papers/Curve99.pdf. CrossRef Google Scholar

[56] Olshausen B A, Field D J. Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature, 1996, 381: 607–609. CrossRef Google Scholar

[57] Oliver C, Quegan S. Understanding Synthetic Aperture Radar Images. Raleigh: SciTech Publishing, 2004. Google Scholar

[58] Tian Y, Jiang C L, Lin Y G, et al. An evaluation method for sparse microwave imaging radar system using phase diagrams. In: Proc of CIE Radar Conference, Chengdu, 2011. CrossRef Google Scholar

[59] Zhang B C, Jiang H, Hong W, et al. Synthetic aperture radar imaging of sparse targets via compressed sensing. In: Proc of 8th European Conference on Synthetic Aperture Radar (EUSAR), Aachen, 2010. CrossRef Google Scholar

[60] Jiang H, Zhang B C, Lin Y G, et al. Random noise SAR based on compressed sensing. In: Proc of IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Honolulu, 2010. 4624–4627. CrossRef Google Scholar

[61] Shastry M C, Narayanan R M, Rangaswamy M. Compressive radar imaging using white stochastic waveforms. In: Proc of International Waveform Diversity and Design Conference (WDD), Niagara Falls, 2010. 90–94. CrossRef Google Scholar

Copyright 2020 Science China Press Co., Ltd. 《中国科学》杂志社有限责任公司 版权所有

京ICP备18024590号-1       京公网安备11010102003388号