logo

SCIENCE CHINA Information Sciences, Volume 59, Issue 4: 042408(2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-015-5440-5

LSB page refresh based retention error recovery scheme for MLC NAND Flash

More info
  • ReceivedMay 26, 2015
  • AcceptedJul 9, 2015
  • PublishedJan 15, 2016

Abstract

NAND Flash memories present inevitable decline in reliability due to scaling down and multi-level cell (MLC) technology. High retention error rate in highly program/erase (P/E) cycled blocks induces stronger ECC requirement in system, causing higher spare bits cost and hardware overhead. In this paper, a least significant bit (LSB) page refresh based retention recovery scheme is proposed to improve the retention reliability of highly scaled MLC NAND Flash. As in the scheme, LSB page refresh operation induces floating gate electron re-injection to compensate charge leakage during long retention time, and realizes retention error rate reduction. Experiment result on 2x-nm MLC NAND Flash exhibits more than 78\% retention error rate reduction. Compared with reported retention error recovery scheme, the proposed scheme presents 2.5 times recovery efficiency promotion and 60\% latency reduction.


Funded by

"source" : null , "contract" : "2011CBA00602"

National Natural Science Foundation of China(61106102)

National Key Scientific and Technological Project(2013ZX01032001-001)

National Basic Research Program of China(973)


References

[1] Choi S, Kim D, Choi S, et al. 19.2 A 93.4 mm$^2$ 64 GB MLC NAND-flash memory with 16 nm CMOS technology. In: IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest of Technical Papers (ISSCC). San Francisco: IEEE, 2014. 328--329. Google Scholar

[2] Helm M, Park J K, Ghalam A, et al. 19.1 A 128 Gb MLC NAND-flash device using 16 nm planar cell. In: IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest of Technical Papers (ISSCC). San Francisco: IEEE, 2014. 326--327. Google Scholar

[3] Koh Y. NAND flash scaling beyond 20 nm. In: IEEE International Memory Workshop, IMW'09. Monterey: IEEE, 2009. 1--3. Google Scholar

[4] Yoon J H, Tressler G A. Advanced flash technology status, scaling trends implications to enterprise SSD technology enablement. In: Flash Memory Summit, Santa Clara, 2012. Google Scholar

[5] Kang D, Lee K, Seo S, et al. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2013, 34: 1139-1141 CrossRef Google Scholar

[6] Ho K C, Fang P C, Li H P, et al. A 45 nm 6b/cell charge-trapping flash memory using LDPC-based ECC and drift-immune soft-sensing engine. In: IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest of Technical Papers (ISSCC). San Francisco: IEEE, 2013. 222--223. Google Scholar

[7] Dong G, Xie N, Zhang T. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Regular Papers, 2013, 60: 2412-2421 CrossRef Google Scholar

[8] Tanakamaru S, Yanagihara Y, Takeuchi K. Over-10x-Extended-Lifetime 76\. Google Scholar

[9] Tanakamaru S, Yanagihara Y, Takeuchi K. IEEE J Solid-State Circ, 2013, 48: 2920-2933 CrossRef Google Scholar

[10] Tanakamaru S, Doi M, Takeuchi K. Error-prediction analyses in 1X, 2X and 3X nm NAND flash memories for system-level reliability improvement of solid-state drives (SSDs). In: IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS). Anaheim: IEEE, 2013. 3B.3.1--3B.3.6. Google Scholar

[11] Ma H, Zou H, Pan L, et al. MLC nand flash retention error recovery scheme through word line program disturbance. In: International Symposium on Next-Generation Electronics (ISNE). Kwei-Shan: IEEE, 2014. 1--2. Google Scholar

[12] Micheloni R, Marelli A, Commodaro S. NAND overview: from memory to systems. In: Micheloni R, Crippa L, Marelli A, eds. Inside NAND Flash Memories. New York: Spinger, 2010. 19--53. Google Scholar

[13] JEDEC Solid State Technology Association. Stress-test-driven qualification of integrated circuits. JESD47G. http://www.jedec.org/. 2010. Google Scholar

[14] Olivo P, Ricco B, Sangiorgi E. Appl Phys Lett, 1986, 48: 1135-1137 CrossRef Google Scholar

[15] Cappelletti P, Bez R, Cantarelli D, et al. Failure mechanisms of flash cell in program/erase cycling. In: International Electron Devices Meeting IEDM'94 Technical Digest. San Francisco: IEEE, 1994. 291--294. Google Scholar

[16] Cai Y, Haratsch E F, Mutlu O, et al. Error patterns in MLC NAND flash memory: measurement, characterization, and analysis. In: Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition (DATE). Dresden: IEEE, 2012. 521--526. Google Scholar

[17] Dong G, Pan Y, Xie N, et al. IEEE Trans Very Large Scale Integration Syst, 2012, 20: 1705-1714 CrossRef Google Scholar

[18] Satoh S, Hagiwara H, Tanzawa T, et al. A novel isolation-scaling technology for NAND EEPROMs with the minimized program disturbance. In: International Electron Devices Meeting IEDM'97 Technical Digest. Washington: IEEE, 1997. 291--294. Google Scholar

[19] Lee D, Hur H, Choi D. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2002, 23: 264-266 CrossRef Google Scholar

[20] Monzio Compagnoni C, Spinelli A S, Gusmeroli R, et al. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2008, 55: 2695-2702 CrossRef Google Scholar

[21] Lee J D, Choi J H, Park D, et al. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2004, 24: 748-750 Google Scholar

[22] Papadas C, Pananakakis G, Ghibaudo G, et al. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 1995, 42: 678-682 CrossRef Google Scholar

[23] Choi Y J, Suh K D, Koh Y N, et al. A high speed programming scheme for multi-level NAND flash memory. In: IEEE Symposium on VLSI Circuits Digest of Technical Papers, Honolulu, 1996. 170--171. Google Scholar

[24] Miki H, Osabe T, Tega N, et al. Quantitative analysis of random telegraph signals as fluctuations of threshold voltages in scaled flash memory cells. In: Proceedings of 45th Annual IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium. Phoenix: IEEE, 2007. 29--35. Google Scholar

Copyright 2019 Science China Press Co., Ltd. 《中国科学》杂志社有限责任公司 版权所有

京ICP备18024590号-1