logo

SCIENCE CHINA Information Sciences, Volume 60, Issue 7: 070205(2017) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-016-9089-7

Simultaneous attack of a stationary target using multiple missiles: a consensus-based approach

More info
  • ReceivedNov 24, 2016
  • AcceptedApr 24, 2017
  • PublishedJun 9, 2017

Abstract

This paper considers the simultaneous attack problem of multiple missiles against a stationary target.Built upon the classic proportional navigation structure, we propose a consensus-based approach to design the cooperative guidance law.Specifically, we present time-varying navigation ratios for the missiles, which exchange the time-to-go estimates between neighboring missilesvia a communication network. For the cases where the communication topology is undirected or in the leader–follower structure with a missile acting as the leader whose navigation ratio cannot be tuned, we show that the proposed cooperative guidance law can solve the simultaneous attack problem. The effectiveness of the theoretical results is finally illustrated by numerical simulations.


Acknowledgment

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11332001, 61473005, 91216304).


References

[1] Jeon I S, Lee J I, Tahk M J. Homing guidance law for cooperative attack of multiple missiles. J Guidance Control Dyn, 2010, 33: 275-280 CrossRef Google Scholar

[2] Jeon I S, Lee J I, Tahk M J. Impact-time-control guidance law for anti-ship missiles. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Tech, 2006, 14: 260-266 CrossRef Google Scholar

[3] Lee J I, Jeon I S, Tahk M J. Guidance law to control impact time and angle. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 2007, 43: 301-310 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[4] Kim T H, Lee C H, Jeon I S. Augmented polynomial guidance with impact time and angle constraints. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 2013, 49: 2806-2817 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[5] Harl N, Balakrishnan S N. Impact time and angle guidance with sliding mode control. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Tech, 2012, 20: 1436-1449 CrossRef Google Scholar

[6] Snyder M G, Li C, Qu Z. A new parameterized guidance law for cooperative air defense. In: Proceedings of the 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Nashville, 2012. Google Scholar

[7] Zhang P, Liu H H T, Li X. Fault tolerance of cooperative interception using multiple flight vehicles. J Franklin Institute, 2013, 350: 2373-2395 CrossRef Google Scholar

[8] Wei X, Wang Y, Dong S, et al. A three-dimensional cooperative guidance law of multimissile system. Int J Aerospace Eng, 2015, 1: 1--8. Google Scholar

[9] Ou L, Wang Y, Liu L. Cooperative control of multi-missile systems. IET Control Theory A, 2015, 9: 441-446 CrossRef Google Scholar

[10] Olfati-Saber R, Murray R M. Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2004, 49: 1520-1533 CrossRef Google Scholar

[11] Olfati-Saber R, Fax J A, Murray R M. Consensus and cooperation in networked multi-agent systems. Proc IEEE, 2007, 95: 215-233 CrossRef Google Scholar

[12] Li Z, Ren W, Liu X. Distributed containment control of multi-agent systems with general linear dynamics in the presence of multiple leaders. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control, 2013, 23: 534-547 CrossRef Google Scholar

[13] Zhao Y, Duan Z, Wen G. Distributed finite-time tracking of multiple Euler-Lagrange systems without velocity measurements. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control, 2015, 25: 1688-1703 CrossRef Google Scholar

[14] Zhao Y, Duan Z, Wen G. Distributed finite-time tracking control for multi-agent systems: an observer-based approach. Syst Control Lett, 2013, 62: 22-28 CrossRef Google Scholar

[15] Li Z, Ren W, Liu X. Distributed consensus of linear multi-agent systems with adaptive dynamic protocols. Automatica, 2013, 49: 1986-1995 CrossRef Google Scholar

[16] Wen G, Duan Z, Yu W. Consensus in multi-agent systems with communication constraints. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control, 2012, 22: 170-182 CrossRef Google Scholar

[17] Wen G, Duan Z, Yu W. Consensus of multi-agent systems with nonlinear dynamics and sampled-data information: a delayed-input approach. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control, 2013, 23: 602-619 CrossRef Google Scholar

[18] Yu W, Ren W, Zheng W X. Distributed control gains design for consensus in multi-agent systems with second-order nonlinear dynamics. Automatica, 2013, 49: 2107-2115 CrossRef Google Scholar

[19] Zhang Y, Yang Y, Zhao Y. Finite-time consensus tracking for harmonic oscillators using both state feedback control and output feedback control. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control, 2013, 23: 878-893 CrossRef Google Scholar

[20] Hu G. Robust consensus tracking of a class of second-order multi-agent dynamic systems. Syst Control Lett, 2012, 61: 134-142 CrossRef Google Scholar

[21] Wei Ren , Beard R W, Atkins E M. Information consensus in multivehicle cooperative control. IEEE Control Syst Mag, 2007, 27: 71-82 CrossRef Google Scholar

[22] Wang Q, Perc M, Duan Z. Delay-induced multiple stochastic resonances on scale-free neuronal networks. Chaos, 2009, 19: 023112 CrossRef PubMed ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[23] Wang Q, Duan Z, Perc M. Synchronization transitions on small-world neuronal networks: effects of information transmission delay and rewiring probability. Europhys Lett, 2008, 83: 50008 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[24] Olfati-Saber R, Murray R M. Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2004, 49: 1520-1533 CrossRef Google Scholar

[25] Yu S, Yu X, Shirinzadeh B. Continuous finite-time control for robotic manipulators with terminal sliding mode. Automatica, 2005, 41: 1957-1964 CrossRef Google Scholar

Copyright 2020 Science China Press Co., Ltd. 《中国科学》杂志社有限责任公司 版权所有

京ICP备18024590号-1