More info
  • ReceivedNov 15, 2017
  • AcceptedFeb 26, 2018
  • PublishedJul 9, 2018


The 5th-generation mobile communication system (5G) has higher security requirements than previous systems. Accordingly, international standard organizations, operators, and equipment manufacturers are focusing extensively on 5G security technology. This paper analyzes the security requirements of 5G business applications, network architecture, the air interface, and user privacy. The development trends of 5G security architecture are summarized, with a focus on endogenous defense architecture, which represents a new trend in 5G security development. Several incremental 5G security technologies are reviewed, including physical layer security, lightweight encryption, network slice security, user privacy protection, and block chain technology applied to 5G.


This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants Nos. 61521003, 61379006, 61471396, 61501516, 61601514, 61701538).


[1] SA. 3rd generation partnership project service and system aspects. http://www.3gpp.org/specifications-groups/. Google Scholar

[2] You X H, Pan Z W, Gao X Q. The 5G mobile communication: the development trends and its emerging key techniques (in Chinese). Sci Chin Inform, 2014, 44: 551-563 CrossRef Google Scholar

[3] Huang K Z, Jin L, Zhao H. Study on the security threat and protection technologies of 5G. Des Tech Post Telecommun, 2015, 6: 8--12. Google Scholar

[4] 3rd generation partnership project. Google Scholar

[5] 5G PPP phase1 security landscape produced by the 5G PPP security WG. 2017. https://5g-ppp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/5G-PPP_White-Paper_Phase-1-Security-Landscape_June-2017.pdf. Google Scholar

[6] NGMN. NGMN 5G white paper. http://ngmn.org/5g-white-paper.html. Google Scholar

[7] China Communications Standards Association (CCSA). Study on the 5G security technology. 2016. http://www.ccsa.org.cn/tc/meeting.php?meeting_id=5495. Google Scholar

[8] China Communications Standards Association (CCSA). Technical requirement on 5G security. 2017. http://www.ccsa.org.cn/tc/meeting.php?meeting_id=5693. Google Scholar

[9] Ericsson. 5G security: scenarios and solutions. 2015. http://www.ericsson.com/cn/res/docs/whitepapers/wp-5g-security.pdf. Google Scholar

[10] Datang Telecom Technology & Industry Group. Building a safe and secure cyberspace: 5G network security white paper (in Chinese). 2015. Google Scholar

[11] Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. 5G: safety requirements and safety principles, Huawei white paper. 2015. https://max.book118.com/html/2017/0709/121290873.shtm. Google Scholar

[12] Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. 5G scenarios and security design. 2016.. Google Scholar

[13] NOKIA Bell Labs. Securing 5G mobile networks built on distributed telco clouds. 2017. http://docbox.etsi.org/Workshop/2017/201706_SECURITYWEEK/06_5GSECURITY/KEYNOTE_NOKIA_SCHNEIDER.pdf. Google Scholar

[14] Uher J, Harper J, Mennecke R G, et al. Investigating end-to-end security in the fifth generation wireless capabilities and IoT extensions. In: Proceedings of Cyber Sensing, International Society for Optics and Photonics, Baltimore, 2016. Google Scholar

[15] Tao X F, Han Y, Xu X D. Recent advances and future challenges for mobile network virtualization. Sci China Inf Sci, 2017, 60: 040301 CrossRef Google Scholar

[16] Liu Y L, Chen H H, Wang L M. Physical layer security for next generation wireless networks: theories, technologies, and challenges. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials, 2017, 19: 347-376 CrossRef Google Scholar

[17] Duan X Y, Wang X B. Authentication handover and privacy protection in 5G hetnets using software-defined networking. IEEE Commun Mag, 2015, 53: 28-35 CrossRef Google Scholar

[18] Future Forum 5G SIG. 5G: rethink mobile communications for 2020+ white paper. 2014. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26809577. Google Scholar

[19] Prasad A, Benjebbour A, Bulakci O. Agile radio resource management techniques for 5G new radio. IEEE Commun Mag, 2017, 55: 62-63 CrossRef Google Scholar

[20] Sun Y H, Zhao M, Zhang S H. Aggregation transmission scheme for machine type communications. Sci China Inf Sci, 2017, 60: 100305 CrossRef Google Scholar

[21] Jayawickrama B A, He Y, Dutkiewicz E. Scalable spectrum access system for massive machine type communication. IEEE Netw, 2018, 32: 154-160 CrossRef Google Scholar

[22] Lien S Y, Hung S C, Deng D J, et al. Optimum ultra-reliable and low latency communications in 5G new radio. In: Mobile Networks and Applications. Berlin: Springer, 2017. Google Scholar

[23] Pratas N K, Pattathil S, Stefanović Č, et al. Massive machine-type communication (mMTC) access with integrated authentication. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications, Paris, 2017. Google Scholar

[24] Mathur C N, Subbalakshmi K P. A light weight enhancement to RC4 based security for resource constrained wireless devices. Int J Netw Secur, 2007, 5: 205--212. Google Scholar

[25] Hamamreh J M, Basar E, Arslan H. OFDM-subcarrier index selection for enhancing security and reliability of 5G URLLC services. IEEE Access, 2017, 5: 25863-25875 CrossRef Google Scholar

[26] Hoymann C, Astely D, Stattin M. LTE release 14 outlook. IEEE Commun Mag, 2016, 54: 44-49 CrossRef Google Scholar

[27] Ni J B, Zhang A Q, Lin X D. Security, privacy, and fairness in fog-based vehicular crowdsensing. IEEE Commun Mag, 2017, 55: 146-152 CrossRef Google Scholar

[28] Open Networking Foundation. Software defined networking: the new norm for networks. 2013. https://www.opennetworking.org/images/stories/downloads/sdn-resources/white-papers/wp-sdn-newnorm.pdf. Google Scholar

[29] ETSI. Network function virtualization: architectural framework. 2013. http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_gs/NFV/001_099/002/01.01.01_60/gs_NFV002v010101p.pdf. Google Scholar

[30] Xu D Y, Ren P Y, Du Q H. Towards win-win: weighted-Voronoi-diagram based channel quantization for security enhancement in downlink cloud-RAN with limited CSI feedback. Sci China Inf Sci, 2017, 60: 040303 CrossRef Google Scholar

[31] Pfaff B, Scherer J, Hock D, et al. SDN/NFV-enabled security architecture for fine-grained policy enforcement and threat mitigation for enterprise networks. In: Proceedings of the SIGCOMM Posters and Demos, Los Angeles, 2017. Google Scholar

[32] Petroulakis N E, Fysarakis K, Askoxylakis I. Reactive security for SDN/NFV-enabled industrial networks leveraging service function chaining. Trans Emerg Telecommun Technol, 2017, 27: 3269 CrossRef Google Scholar

[33] Ordonez-Lucena J, Ameigeiras P, Lopez D. Network slicing for 5G with SDN/NFV: concepts, architectures, and challenges. IEEE Commun Mag, 2017, 55: 80-87 CrossRef Google Scholar

[34] Rhee M Y. Cryptography and Secure Communications. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993. Google Scholar

[35] Zhang X W, Kunz A, Schröder S. Overview of 5G security in 3GPP. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Standards for Communications and Networking (CSCN), Helsinki, 2017. 181--186. Google Scholar

[36] Soderi S, Mucchi L, Hamalainen M. Physical layer security based on spread-spectrum watermarking and jamming receiver. Trans Emerg Telecommun Technol, 2017, 28: 3142 CrossRef Google Scholar

[37] Li L M, Wang D M, Niu X K. mmWave communications for 5G: implementation challenges and advances. Sci China Inf Sci, 2018, 61: 021301 CrossRef Google Scholar

[38] Ji X S, Yang J, Huang K Z, et al. Physical layer authentication scheme based on Hash method. J Electron Inf Technol, 2016, 38: 2900--2907. Google Scholar

[39] Yang J. Research on authentication schemes based on physical layer security. Dissertation for Master Degree. Zhengzhou: PLA Information Engineering University, 2016. Google Scholar

[40] Akpakwu G A, Silva B J, Hancke G P. A survey on 5G networks for the internet of things: communication technologies and challenges. IEEE Access, 2018, 6: 3619-3647 CrossRef Google Scholar

[41] Zhang J, Ge X H, Li Q. 5G millimeter-wave antenna array: design and challenges. IEEE Wirel Commun, 2017, 24: 106-112 CrossRef Google Scholar

[42] Gandotra P, Jha R K. A survey on green communication and security challenges in 5G wireless communication networks. J Netw Comput Appl, 2017, 96: 39-61 CrossRef Google Scholar

[43] Roiger R J. Data Mining: a Tutorial-Based Primer. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2017. Google Scholar

[44] Gupta A, Jha R K. A survey of 5G network: architecture and emerging technologies. IEEE Access, 2015, 3: 1206-1232 CrossRef Google Scholar

[45] Kumar T, Liyanage M, Ahmad I, et al. User privacy, identity and trust in 5G. In: A Comprehensive Guide to 5G Security. Hoboken: Wiley, 2018. Google Scholar

[46] Wu J X. Research on network space mimicry defense technology. Cyber Secur, 2016, 1: 1--10. Google Scholar

[47] Hu H C, Chen F C, Wang Z P. Several issues and performance evaluation of pseudo mimicry defense DHR model. Cyber Secur, 2016, 1: 40--51. Google Scholar

[48] Wu J X. A brief introduction to cyberspace mimicry defense principle. Civil Mil Integration, 2017, 2: 30--35. Google Scholar

[49] Wu J X. Nextwork space mimicry defense technology (in Chinese). Secrecy Sci Technol, 2014, 10: 4--9. Google Scholar

[50] Ji X S, Huang K Z, Wen H. Achieving strong security based on fountain code with coset pre-coding. IET Commun, 2014, 8: 2476-2483 CrossRef Google Scholar

[51] Li X Y, Wang X, Xu X. A distributed implementation algorithm for physical layer security based on untrusted relay cooperation and artificial noise. ETRI J, 2014, 36: 183-186 CrossRef Google Scholar

[52] Ji X S, Kang X, Huang K Z. The full-duplex artificial noise scheme for security of a cellular system. China Commun, 2015, 12: 150-156 CrossRef Google Scholar

[53] Yang N, Wang L F, Geraci G. Safeguarding 5G wireless communication networks using physical layer security. IEEE Commun Mag, 2015, 53: 20-27 CrossRef Google Scholar

[54] Wang C X, You X H, Wang J. Special focus on 5G wireless communication networks. Sci China Inf Sci, 2016, 59: 020300 CrossRef Google Scholar

[55] Zhong Z. Reseach on secure coding and transmission mechanism under equivalent channel feature variable model. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. Zhengzhou: PLA Information Engineering University, 2013. Google Scholar

[56] Ahlswede R, Csiszar I. Common randomness in information theory and cryptography. I. Secret sharing. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 1993, 39: 1121-1132 CrossRef Google Scholar

[57] Huang Y, Jin L, Li N. Secret key generation based on private pilot under man-in-the-middle attack. Sci China Inf Sci, 2017, 60: 100307 CrossRef Google Scholar

[58] Aono T, Higuchi K, Ohira T. Wireless secret key generation exploiting reactance-domain scalar response of multipath fading channels. IEEE Trans Antenn Propag, 2005, 53: 3776-3784 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[59] Sayeed A, Perrig A. Secure wireless communications: secret keys through multipath. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Las Vegas, 2008. 3013--3016. Google Scholar

[60] Chen C, Jensen M A. Secret key establishment using temporally and spatially correlated wireless channel coefficients. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput, 2011, 10: 205-215 CrossRef Google Scholar

[61] Wang H M, Zheng T X, Yuan J. Physical layer security in heterogeneous cellular networks. IEEE Trans Commun, 2016, 64: 1204-1219 CrossRef Google Scholar

[62] Lv T J, Gao H, Yang S S. Secrecy transmit beamforming for heterogeneous networks. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 2015, 33: 1154-1170 CrossRef Google Scholar

[63] Dong L, Han Z, Petropulu A P. Improving wireless physical layer security via cooperating relays. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2010, 58: 1875-1888 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[64] Zheng G, Choo L C, Wong K K. Optimal cooperative jamming to enhance physical layer security using relays. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2011, 59: 1317-1322 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[65] Zhang R Q, Cheng X, Yang L Q. Cooperation via spectrum sharing for physical layer security in device-to-device communications underlaying cellular networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2016, 15: 5651-5663 CrossRef Google Scholar

[66] Xu C, Zeng P, Liang W. Secure resource allocation for green and cognitive device-to-device communication. Sci China Inf Sci, 2018, 61: 029305 CrossRef Google Scholar

[67] Deng Y S, Wang L F, Wong K K, et al. Safeguarding massive MIMO aided hetnets using physical layer security. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Wireless Communications & Signal Processing, Nanjing, 2015. Google Scholar

[68] Zhu J, Schober R, Bhargava V K. Secure transmission in multicell massive MIMO systems. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2014, 13: 4766-4781 CrossRef Google Scholar

[69] Zhu J, Schober R, Bhargava V K. Linear precoding of data and artificial noise in secure massive MIMO systems. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2016, 15: 2245-2261 CrossRef Google Scholar

[70] Kapetanovic D, Zheng G, Rusek F. Physical layer security for massive MIMO: an overview on passive eavesdropping and active attacks. IEEE Commun Mag, 2015, 53: 21-27 CrossRef Google Scholar

[71] Wang C, Wang H M. Physical layer security in millimeter wave cellular networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2016, 15: 5569-5585 CrossRef Google Scholar

[72] Zhu Y X, Wang L F, Wong K K. Secure communications in millimeter wave Ad hoc networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2017, 16: 3205-3217 CrossRef Google Scholar

[73] Xiao M, Mumtaz S, Huang Y M. Millimeter wave communications for future mobile networks. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 2017, 35: 1909-1935 CrossRef Google Scholar

[74] Qin Z J, Liu Y W, Ding Z G, et al. Physical security for 5G non-orthogonal multiple access in large-scale networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications, Kuala Lumpur, 2016. Google Scholar

[75] Liu Y W, Qin Z J, Elkashlan M. Enhancing the physical layer security of non-orthogonal multiple access in large-scale networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2017, 16: 1656-1672 CrossRef Google Scholar

[76] Islam S M, Zeng M, Dobre O A. Noma in 5G systems: existing possibilities for enhancing spectral efficiency. 2017,. arXiv Google Scholar

[77] Patwari N, Kasera S K. Temporal link signature measurements for location distinction. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput, 2011, 10: 449-462 CrossRef Google Scholar

[78] Xiao L, Greenstein L J, Mandayam N B, et al. Fingerprints in the ether: using the physical layer for wireless authentication. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications, Glasgow, 2007. 4646--4651. Google Scholar

[79] Xiao L, Chen T H, Han G A. Game theoretic study on channel-based authentication in MIMO systems. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2017, 66: 7474-7484 CrossRef Google Scholar

[80] Caparra G, Centenaro M, Laurenti N, et al. Energy-based anchor node selection for IoT physical layer authentication. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications, Kuala Lumpur, 2016. Google Scholar

[81] Rahman M M U, Abbasi Q H, Chopra N. Physical layer authentication in Nano networks at terahertz frequencies for biomedical applications. IEEE Access, 2017, 5: 7808-7815 CrossRef Google Scholar

[82] Wang X B, Hao P, Hanzo L. Physical-layer authentication for wireless security enhancement: current challenges and future developments. IEEE Commun Mag, 2016, 54: 152-158 CrossRef Google Scholar

[83] Duan X Y, Wang X B. Fast authentication in 5G HetNet through SDN enabled weighted secure-context-information. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications, Kuala Lumpur, 2016. Google Scholar

[84] Shan D, Zeng K, Xiang W D. PHY-CRAM: physical layer challenge-response authentication mechanism for wireless networks. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 2013, 31: 1817-1827 CrossRef Google Scholar

[85] Du X R, Shan D, Zeng K, et al. Physical layer challenge-response authentication in wireless networks with relay. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, Toronto, 2014. 1276--1284. Google Scholar

[86] Wu X F, Yang Z. Physical-layer authentication for multi-carrier transmission. IEEE Commun Lett, 2015, 19: 74-77 CrossRef Google Scholar

[87] Wu X F, Yang Z, Ling C. Artificial-noise-aided physical layer phase challenge-response authentication for practical OFDM transmission. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2016, 15: 6611-6625 CrossRef Google Scholar

[88] Wen H, Ho P H, Gong G. A novel framework for message authentication in vehicular communication networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Global Telecommunications, Honolulu, 2009. Google Scholar

[89] Wang Y F, Zhou L, Zhu X P. Physical layer assist authentication technique for smart meter system. IET Commun, 2013, 7: 189-197 CrossRef Google Scholar

[90] Wu X F, Yan Z, Ling C, et al. A physical-layer authentication assisted scheme for enhancing 3GPP authentication. Mathematics, 2015,. arXiv Google Scholar

[91] Yang J, Ji X C, Huang K Z. AKA-PLA: enhanced AKA based on physical layer authentication. KSII Trans Int Inf Syst, 2017, 11: 3747-3765 CrossRef Google Scholar

[92] Maurer U M. Secret key agreement by public discussion from common information. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 1993, 39: 733-742 CrossRef Google Scholar

[93] Wang X, Jin L, Song H W, et al. Physical layer security key capacity based on wireless channel parameters. J Electron Inf Technol, 2016, 38: 2612--2618. Google Scholar

[94] Wang X, Jin L, Liu L, et al. Analysis of physical layer security key capacity in uniform scattering environment. J Commun, 2016, 37: 75--81. Google Scholar

[95] Furqan H M, Hamamreh J M, Arslan H. Secret key generation using channel quantization with SVD for reciprocal MIMO channels. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems, Poznan, 2016. 597--602. Google Scholar

[96] Taha H, Alsusa E. Secret Key exchange using private random precoding in MIMO FDD and TDD systems. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2017, 66: 4823-4833 CrossRef Google Scholar

[97] Lai L F, Liang Y B, Du W L. Cooperative key generation in wireless networks. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 2012, 30: 1578-1588 CrossRef Google Scholar

[98] Wang N, Zhang N, Gulliver T A. Cooperative key agreement for wireless networking: key rates and practical protocol design. IEEE Trans Inf Foren Secur, 2014, 9: 272-284 CrossRef Google Scholar

[99] Chen K, Natarajan B, Shattil S. Secret key generation rate with power allocation in relay-based LTE-A networks. IEEE Trans Inf Foren Secur, 2015, 10: 2424-2434 CrossRef Google Scholar

[100] Ngassa C L K, Moliere R, Delaveau F. Secret key generation scheme from WiFi and LTE reference signals. Analog Integ Circ Signal Process, 2017, 91: 277-292 CrossRef Google Scholar

[101] ITU. New proposal about requirement and evaluation criteria of technologies to enhance security and privacy of radio communications. ITU-R66 WRC-19, 2016. Google Scholar

[102] ITU. Proposal for studies related to the security of machine-type communications and internet of things. ITU-R66 WRC-19, 2016. Google Scholar

[103] Thales. Enhanced protections using physical layer security. 3GPP TSG SA WG3 #82 S3-160267, 2016. Google Scholar

[104] Thales. PCR for adding solution for key issues #7.4 and #7.7: effective generation of temporary or short-time identifiers based on channel estimation. 3GPP TSG SA WG3 #85 S3-161639, 2016. Google Scholar

[105] Thales. Study on architecture and security for nest generation system. 3GPP TSG SA WG3 #82 S3-160278, 2016. Google Scholar

[106] ISO/IEC 29192. Information technology-security techniques-lightweight cryptography -- part 1: general / part 2: block ciphers / part 3: stream ciphers / part 4: mechanisms using asymmetric techniques. 2016. Google Scholar

[107] Cannière C, Preneel B. Trivium: a stream cipher construction inspired by block cipher design principles. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Information Security, Samos, 2006. 171--186. Google Scholar

[108] Bogdanov A, Knudsen L R, Leander G, et al. PRESENT: an ultra-lightweight block cipher. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems, Vienna, 2007. 450--466. Google Scholar

[109] Shirai T, Shibutani K, Akishita T, et al. The 128-bit blockcipher CLEFIA. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Fast Software Encryption, Luxembourg, 2007. 181--195. Google Scholar

[110] Albrecht M R, Driessen B, Kavun E B, et al. Block ciphers-focus on the linear layer. In: Proceedings of International Cryptology Conference, Santa Barbara, 2014. 57--76. Google Scholar

[111] Beaulieuand R, Shors D, Smith J, et al. Performance of the SIMON and SPECK Family of Lightweight Block Ciphers. National Security Agency Technical Report, 2014. Google Scholar

[112] Berger T P, Hayer J D, et al. The GLUON family. Google Scholar

[113] Bansod G, Patil A, Sutar S, et al. An ultra lightweight encryption design for security in pervasive computing. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Big Data Security on Cloud, New York, 2016. 79--84. Google Scholar

[114] Alshamsi A Z, Barka E S, Serhani M A. Lightweight encryption algorithm in wireless body area network for e-health monitoring. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology, Al-Ain, 2016. 144--150. Google Scholar

[115] Peng C, Du X, Li K. An ultra-lightweight encryption scheme in underwater acoustic networks. J Senss, 2016, 2016: 1-10 CrossRef Google Scholar

[116] Win E K, Yoshihisa T, Yoshimasa I, et al. A lightweight multi-receiver encryption scheme with mutual authentication. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference, Turin, 2017. 491--497. Google Scholar

[117] Usman M, Ahmed I, Aslam M I, et al. SIT: a lightweight encryption algorithm for secure internet of things. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl, 2017, 8: 1--10. Google Scholar

[118] Tahir S, Ruj S, Rahulamathavan Y. A New Secure and Lightweight Searchable Encryption Scheme over Encrypted Cloud Data. IEEE Trans Emerg Top Comput, 2017, : 1-1 CrossRef Google Scholar

[119] Zenger C T, Chur M J, Posoclck J F, et al. A novel key generating architecture for wireless low-resource devices. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Secure Internet of Things Workshop, Taipei, 2014. 26--34. Google Scholar

[120] Fritschek R, Wunder G. On-the-fly secure key generation with deterministic models. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications, Paris, 2017. Google Scholar

[121] Shi L, Yuan J W, Yu S C. MASK-BAN: movement-aided authenticated secret key extraction utilizing channel characteristics in body area networks. IEEE Int Things J, 2015, 2: 52-62 CrossRef Google Scholar

[122] Gungor O, Chen F Z, Koksal C E. Secret key generation via localization and mobility. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2015, 64: 2214-2230 CrossRef Google Scholar

[123] Wang W J, Jiang H Y, Xia X G. A wireless secret key generation method based on Chinese remainder theorem in FDD systems. Sci China Inf Sci, 2012, 55: 1605-1616 CrossRef Google Scholar

[124] Lou Y M, Jin L, Zhong Z. Secret key generation scheme based on MIMO received signal spaces (in Chinese). Sin Chin Inform, 2017, 47: 362-373 CrossRef Google Scholar

[125] IMT-2020 (5G) Propulsion Group. 5G network technology framework. 2015. http://www.imt-2020.cn/zh/documents/1. Google Scholar

[126] NGMN. 5G security recommendations package #2: network slicing. 2016. http://ngmn.org/5g-white-paper.html. Google Scholar

[127] 3rd generation partnership project. Google Scholar

[128] China Mobile Communications Corporation, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Deutsche Telekom AG, Volkswagen. 5G service-guaranteed network slicing white paper. 2017. https://www.huawei.com/ch-en/industry-insights/outlook/mbb-2020/trends-insights/5g-service-guaranteed-network-slicing-whitepaper. Google Scholar

[129] Study on subscriber privacy impact in 3GPP (Release 14). TR 33.849 Version 2.0.0, 2016. Google Scholar

[130] Feasibility study on new services and markets technology enablers for network operation (Release 15). TR 22.864 Version 15.0.0, 2016. Google Scholar

[131] Study on new services and markets technology enablers (Release 9). TR 22.891 Version 14.2.0, 2016. Google Scholar

[132] Service requirements for V2X services (Release 14). TS 22.185 Version 14.3.0, 2017. Google Scholar

[133] Zhou S G, Li F, Tao Y F. Privacy preservation in database applications: a survey. Chin J Comput, 2009, 32: 847-861 CrossRef Google Scholar

[134] Sweeney L. K-anonymity: a model for protecting privacy. Int J Uncertain Fuzz Knowl-Based Syst, 2002, 10: 557-570 CrossRef Google Scholar

[135] Machanavajjhala A, Kifer D, Gehrke J. L-diversity: privacy beyond k-anonymity. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering, Atlanta, 2006. Google Scholar

[136] Li N H, li T C, Venkatasubramanian S. T-closeness: privacy beyond k-anonymity and l-diversity. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering, Istanbul, 2007. 106--115. Google Scholar

[137] Dwork C. Differential privacy: a survey of results. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Models of Computation, Xi'an, 2008. Google Scholar

[138] Internet Engineering Task Force. Representation of uncertainty and confidence in the presence information data format location object (PIDF-LO). IETF standard RFC 7459-2015. https://buildbot.tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7459. Google Scholar

[139] Dewri R. Local differential perturbations: location privacy under approximate knowledge attackers. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput, 2013, 12: 2360-2372 CrossRef Google Scholar

[140] Yao B, Li F F, Xiao X K. Secure nearest neighbor revisited. In: Proceedings of the 29th IEEE Internation Conference on Data Engineering, Brisbane, 2013. 733--744. Google Scholar

[141] Stach C, Mitschang B. Privacy management for mobile platforms -- a review of concepts and approaches. In: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management, Milan, 2013. 305--313. Google Scholar

[142] Future-Forum. The 2nd conference of future forum information security group. 5G security white paper framework recommendations. 2017.. Google Scholar

[143] Nakamoto S. Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. 2008. https://bitcoin.org/en/bitcoin-paper. Google Scholar

[144] Ruubel M. Guardtime federal and galois awarded darpa contract to formally verify blockchain-based integrity monitoring system. https://guardtime.com/blog/galois-and-guardtime-federal-awarded-1-8m-darpa-contract-to-formally-verify-blockchain-based-inte. Google Scholar

[145] Zyskind G, Nathan O, Pentland A S. Decentralizing privacy: using blockchain to protect personal data. In: Proceedings of IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops, San Jose, 2015. 180--184. Google Scholar

[146] Kravitz D W, Cooper J. Securing user identity and transactions symbiotically: IoT meets blockchain. In: Proceedings of IEEE Global Internet of Things Summit, Geneva, 2017. Google Scholar

[147] Lei A, Cruickshank H, Cao Y. Blockchain-based dynamic key management for heterogeneous intelligent transportation systems. IEEE Int Things J, 2017, 4: 1832-1843 CrossRef Google Scholar

[148] Cai C J, Yuan X L, Wang C. Towards trustworthy and private keyword search in encrypted decentralized storage. In: Proceedings of 2017 IEEE International Conference on Conmunications, Paris, 2017. Google Scholar

[149] IBM Institute for Business Value. Device democracy: saving the future of the internet of things. http://www-935.ibm.com/services/us/gbs/thoughtleadership/internetofthings/. Google Scholar

Copyright 2019 Science China Press Co., Ltd. 《中国科学》杂志社有限责任公司 版权所有