SCIENCE CHINA Information Sciences, Volume 61, Issue 10: 101301(2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-018-9456-x

Thoughts on the development of novel network technology

More info
  • ReceivedMar 27, 2018
  • AcceptedMay 20, 2018
  • PublishedAug 16, 2018


In this paper, we explore potential innovations that could lead to breakthrough developments in Internet technologies. The deep integration of the Internet and economic society brings professionalized service capacity demand, while existing Internet infrastructure with its current technological systems still face a number of challenges, such as intelligence, diversification, personalization, robustness, and efficiency. First, we analyze the actual foundation of innovation and specify the basic technical features of a novel network. Then, we propose a fully dimensionally definable open architecture as the primary direction, and consider reshaping baseline technologies as a starting point and discuss the core operational mechanisms of the novel network based on such reshaped baseline technologies.


This work was supported by Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61521003), National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863) (Grant No. 2015AA016102), Medium and Long-Term Development Strategy Research of National Engineering Science and Technology of China (Grant No. 2016-ZCQ-04), Program of Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (Grant No. 16DZ1120503), and Program for Science and Technology Development of Henan Province (Grant No. 162102210034). Thanks for the help from professor Julong LAN, researcher Peng YI, associate researcher Yuxiang HU, Doctor Xiaohui ZHANG, Doctor Peng WANG and many other fellows in our team for their helpful ideas during the composition of this paper. Meanwhile, thanks for the valuable suggestions from academician Yunjie LIU, academician Jianping WU, professor Xiaohu YOU, professor Hongke ZHANG, professor Chengqi CHENG and professor Shaojun WEI.


[1] Wu J X, Lan J L, Cheng D N, et al. Novel Network Architecture (in Chinese). Beijing: Post Telecom Press, 2014. Google Scholar

[2] Rexford J, Dovrolis C. Future Internet architecture: clean-slate versus evolutionary research. Commun ACM, 2010, 53: 36--40. Google Scholar

[3] Wu J P, Li X, Liu Y. Research status and development trends of next-generation Internet architecture (in Chinese). ZTE Tech J, 2011, 17: 10--14. Google Scholar

[4] Quan W, Zhang H K. Future Internet architecture: research status, hot topics, and development practice (in Chinese). Sin Chin Inform, 2017, 47: 804--810. Google Scholar

[5] Pan J, Paul S, Jain R. A survey of the research on future internet architectures. IEEE Commun Mag, 2011, 49: 26--36. Google Scholar

[6] Huang T, Liu J, Huo R, et al. Survey of research on future network architectures (in Chinese). J Commun, 2014, 35: 184--197. Google Scholar

[7] Li L M. Future network architectures (in Chinese). ZTE Tech J, 2013, 19: 39--42. Google Scholar

[8] McKeown N, Anderson T, Balakrishnan H, et al. OpenFlow: enabling innovation in campus networks. ACM SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev, 2008, 38: 69--74. Google Scholar

[9] Hakiri A, Gokhale A, Berthou P. Software-Defined Networking: Challenges and research opportunities for Future Internet. Comput Networks, 2014, 75: 453-471 CrossRef Google Scholar

[10] Han B, Gopalakrishnan V, Ji L S, et al. Network function virtualization: Challenges and opportunities for innovations. IEEE Commun Mag, 2015, 53: 90--97. Google Scholar

[11] Mijumbi R, Serrat J, Gorricho J L, et al. Management and orchestration challenges in network functions virtualization. IEEE Commun Mag, 2016, 54: 98--105. Google Scholar

[12] Wang B Q, Wu J X. Development trends and associated countermeasures analysis for NGN (in Chinese). J Inf Eng Univ, 2009, 10: 1--6. Google Scholar

[13] Balasubramaniam S, Leibnitz K, Lio P, et al. Biological principles for future internet architecture design. IEEE Commun Mag, 2011, 49: 44--52. Google Scholar

[14] Ousterhout J K, Cherenson A R, Douglis F, et al. The sprite network operating system. Computer, 2002, 21: 23--36. Google Scholar

[15] Shen Q G, Yu Z W, Gong J. Review of next generation network architcture (in Chinese). J Commun, 2010, 31: 3--17. Google Scholar

[16] Ma M J, Sun F G, Zhai L G, etc. Security challenges facing our country and countermeasure recommendations under new network security threats (in Chinese). Telecommun Sci, 2014, 30: 8--12. Google Scholar

[17] Zhao H L, Feng M, Shi F. SDN, key trends of the future network evolution (in Chinese). Telecommun Sci, 2012, 28: 1--5. Google Scholar

[18] Mei H. Understanding "software-defined" from an OS perspective: technical challenges and research issues. Sci China Inf Sci, 2017, 60: 126101 CrossRef Google Scholar

[19] Wood T, Ramakrishnan K K, Hwang J, et al. Toward a software-based network: integrating software defined networking and network function virtualization. IEEE Netw, 2015, 29: 36--41. Google Scholar

[20] Mijumbi R, Serrat J, Gorricho J L, et al. Network function virtualization: state-of-the-art and research challenges. IEEE Commun Surv Tut, 2017, 18: 236--262. Google Scholar

[21] Hu Y X, Lan J L, Wu J X. Providing personalized converged services based on flexible network reconfiguration. Sci China Inf Sci, 2011, 54: 334-347 CrossRef Google Scholar

[22] Li S, Hu D, Fang W. Protocol Oblivious Forwarding (POF): Software-Defined Networking with Enhanced Programmability. IEEE Network, 2017, 31: 58-66 CrossRef Google Scholar

[23] Wu Z, Lu K, Wang X, et al. Alleviating network congestion for HPC clusters with fat-tree interconnection leveraging software-defined networking. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Systems & Informatics, Hangzhou, 2017. 808--813. Google Scholar

[24] Wang C, Li X, Chen Y. Service-Oriented Architecture on FPGA-Based MPSoC. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst, 2017, 28: 2993-3006 CrossRef Google Scholar

[25] Wen R H, Feng G, Tan W, et al. Protocol stack mapping of software defined protocol for next generation mobile networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Kuala Lumpur, 2016. 1--6. Google Scholar

[26] Liu Y, Wei S J. What is still missing in China for the development of artificial intelligence chips (in Chinese)? Chin Integr Circ, 2017, 26: 20--23. Google Scholar

[27] Jacobson V, Smetters D K, Thornton J D, et al. Networking named content. Commun ACM, 2012, 55: 117--124. Google Scholar

[28] Ahlgren B, Dannewitz C, Imbrenda C, et al. A survey of information-centric networking. IEEE Commun Mag, 2012, 50: 26--36. Google Scholar

[29] Dong F, Cheng C, Guo S. Design and research on GeoIP. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperation Work in Design, Fudan, 2010. 13--17. Google Scholar

[30] Zhang H, Quan W, Chao H C, et al. Smart identifier network: a collaborative architecture for the future internet. IEEE Netw, 2016, 30: 46--51. Google Scholar

[31] Clark D D, Partridge C, Ramming J C, et al. A knowledge plane for the Internet. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications, Karlsruhe, 2003. 3--10. Google Scholar

[32] Mestres A, Rodrigueznatal A, Carner J, et al. Knowledge-Defined Networking. ACM SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev, 2016, 47: 2--10. Google Scholar

[33] Hu H, Wu J, Wang Z. Mimic defense: a designed-in cybersecurity defense framework. IET Inform Secur, 2018, 12: 226-237 CrossRef Google Scholar

Copyright 2019 Science China Press Co., Ltd. 《中国科学》杂志社有限责任公司 版权所有