logo

SCIENCE CHINA Information Sciences, Volume 62, Issue 12: 229203(2019) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-018-9756-9

Natural gait analysis for a biped robot: jogging vs. walking

More info
  • ReceivedAug 22, 2018
  • AcceptedJan 15, 2019
  • PublishedNov 4, 2019

Abstract

There is no abstract available for this article.


Acknowledgment

This work was partially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51729501).


Supplement

Appendixes A–C.


References

[1] Matsuoka K. Mechanisms of frequency and pattern control in the neural rhythm generators. Biol Cybernetics, 1987, 56: 345-353 CrossRef Google Scholar

[2] McGeer T. Passive Dynamic Walking. Int J Robotics Res, 1990, 9: 62-82 CrossRef Google Scholar

[3] Goswami A, Espiau B, Keramane A. Limit cycles in a passive compass gait biped and passivity-mimicking control laws. Autonomous Robots, 1997, 4: 273-286 CrossRef Google Scholar

[4] Chen Z, Iwasaki T, Zhu L. Feedback Control for Natural Oscillations of Locomotion Systems Under Continuous Interactions With Environment. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol, 2015, 23: 1294-1306 CrossRef Google Scholar

[5] Khan U I, Chen Z. Natural oscillation in compass-gait biped robots. In: Proceedings of 2016 Australian Control Conference, 2016. 13. Google Scholar

[6] Koop D, Wu C Q. Passive Dynamic Biped Walking-Part I: Development and Validation of an Advanced Model. J Comput NOnlinear Dynam, 2013, 8: 041007 CrossRef Google Scholar

[7] Khan U I, Chen Z. Natural oscillation gait in humanoid biped locomotion. IEEE Trans Control Syst Tech, 2018. Google Scholar

  • Figure 1

    (Color online) (a) Profile of leg angle in sinusoid; (b) normal force profile for walking and jogging gaits; protectłinebreak (c) natural frequency analysis with respect to gait type.

Copyright 2020 Science China Press Co., Ltd. 《中国科学》杂志社有限责任公司 版权所有

京ICP备18024590号-1       京公网安备11010102003388号