logo

SCIENCE CHINA Information Sciences, Volume 63 , Issue 8 : 180301(2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-019-2832-1

In-building coverage of millimeter-wave wireless networks from channel measurement and modeling perspectives

More info
  • ReceivedDec 29, 2019
  • AcceptedMar 16, 2020
  • PublishedJul 15, 2020

Abstract

To progress cost-effective deployment of millimeter-wave (mmWave) wireless networks for indoor users, the prediction of indoor-to-indoor (I2I) and outdoor-to-indoor (O2I) coverage based on field measurement studies is of great interest to the future generation mobile communication system. First, measurements in I2I and O2I scenarios, which have advantages in terms of achieving a fair comparison of channel characteristics across different mmWave bands and bandwidths, are performed. Next, the developed dual-slope path loss model with a break-point distance is found to well fit omnidirectional and directional measured I2I data, especially at 39.5 GHz, revealing that the transition from lit or shadow regions to totally blocked regions is abrupt. Combined with space-time propagation characteristics, the indoor blockage effect on path loss and angular spread is investigated, therein being essential for the design of beam-steering and tracking algorithms. Double-directional measurement results show that most dominant paths arrive along the line-of-sight path, and only a few in-building reflections can be detected in higher frequency bands. Based on the joint analysis of channel measurement and modeling results, several mmWave network design and in-building coverage enhancement insights are presented.


Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by National Key RD Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFB180- 1101), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61960206006, 61671145), and Key RD Program of Jiangsu Province of China (Grant No. BE2018121).


References

[1] Rappaport T S, Shu Sun T S, Mayzus R. Millimeter Wave Mobile Communications for 5G Cellular: It Will Work. IEEE Access, 2013, 1: 335-349 CrossRef Google Scholar

[2] Shafi M, Molisch A F, Smith P J. 5G: A Tutorial Overview of Standards, Trials, Challenges, Deployment, and Practice. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 2017, 35: 1201-1221 CrossRef Google Scholar

[3] Xiao M, Mumtaz S, Huang Y. Millimeter Wave Communications for Future Mobile Networks. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 2017, 35: 1909-1935 CrossRef Google Scholar

[4] Li L, Wang D, Niu X. mmWave communications for 5G: implementation challenges and advances. Sci China Inf Sci, 2018, 61: 021301 CrossRef Google Scholar

[5] Andrews J G, Bai T, Kulkarni M. Modeling and Analyzing Millimeter Wave Cellular Systems. IEEE Trans Commun, 2016, : 1-1 CrossRef Google Scholar

[6] Ramirez D, Huang L, Wang Y. On Opportunistic mmWave Networks With Blockage. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 2017, 35: 2137-2147 CrossRef Google Scholar

[7] Roh W, Seol J Y, Park J. Millimeter-wave beamforming as an enabling technology for 5G cellular communications: theoretical feasibility and prototype results. IEEE Commun Mag, 2014, 52: 106-113 CrossRef Google Scholar

[8] Heath R W, Gonzalez-Prelcic N, Rangan S. An Overview of Signal Processing Techniques for Millimeter Wave MIMO Systems. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process, 2016, 10: 436-453 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[9] Ghatak G, De Domenico A, Coupechoux M. Coverage Analysis and Load Balancing in HetNets With Millimeter Wave Multi-RAT Small Cells. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun, 2018, 17: 3154-3169 CrossRef Google Scholar

[10] Rappaport T S, MacCartney G R, Samimi M K. Wideband Millimeter-Wave Propagation Measurements and Channel Models for Future Wireless Communication System Design. IEEE Trans Commun, 2015, 63: 3029-3056 CrossRef Google Scholar

[11] Rappaport T S, Xing Y, MacCartney G R. Overview of Millimeter Wave Communications for Fifth-Generation (5G) Wireless Networks-With a Focus on Propagation Models. IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat, 2017, 65: 6213-6230 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[12] Wang C X, Bian J, Sun J. A Survey of 5G Channel Measurements and Models. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials, 2018, 20: 3142-3168 CrossRef Google Scholar

[13] Huang J, Wang C X, Liu Y. A novel 3D GBSM for mmWave MIMO channels. Sci China Inf Sci, 2018, 61: 102305 CrossRef Google Scholar

[14] Yin X, Ling C, Kim M D. Experimental Multipath-Cluster Characteristics of 28-GHz Propagation Channel. IEEE Access, 2015, 3: 3138-3150 CrossRef Google Scholar

[15] Maccartney G R, Rappaport T S, Sun S. Indoor Office Wideband Millimeter-Wave Propagation Measurements and Channel Models at 28 and 73 GHz for Ultra-Dense 5G Wireless Networks. IEEE Access, 2015, 3: 2388-2424 CrossRef Google Scholar

[16] Raghavan V, Partyka A, Akhoondzadeh-Asl L. Millimeter Wave Channel Measurements and Implications for PHY Layer Design. IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat, 2017, 65: 6521-6533 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[17] Zhang P Z, Wang H B, Wang H M, et al. Cluster-based analysis of wideband millimeter-wave channel for corridor environment. In: Proceedings of Asia-Pacific Conference on Antennas and Propagation, Xi'an, 2017. Google Scholar

[18] Zhang P, Li J, Wang H. Indoor Small-Scale Spatiotemporal Propagation Characteristics at Multiple Millimeter-Wave Bands. Antennas Wirel Propag Lett, 2018, 17: 2250-2254 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[19] Senic J, Gentile C, Papazian P B. Analysis of E-Band Path Loss and Propagation Mechanisms in the Indoor Environment. IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat, 2017, 65: 6562-6573 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[20] Rappaport T S, Heath R W, Daniels R C, et al. Millimeter Wave Wireless Communications. Englewood Cliffs, 2014. 123--146. Google Scholar

[21] Anderson C R, Rappaport T S. In-Building Wideband Partition Loss Measurements at 2.5 and 60 GHz. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun, 2004, 3: 922-928 CrossRef Google Scholar

[22] Zhao H, Mayzus R, Sun S, et al. 28 GHz millimeter wave cellular communication measurements for reflection and penetration loss in and around buildings in New York city. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communication, Budapest, 2013. 5163--5167. Google Scholar

[23] Karttunen A, Nguyen1 S L H, Koivumaki P, et al. Window and wall penetration loss on-site measurements with three methods. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, London, 2018. Google Scholar

[24] Vargas C E O, Mello L d S. Measurements of reflection and penetration loss of construction materials at 28 GHz and 38 GHz. In: Proceedings of IEEE-APS Topical Conference on Antennas and Propagation in Wireless Communications, Xi'an, 2018. 897--900. Google Scholar

[25] Du Y S, Cao C, Zou X F, et al. Measurement and modeling of penetration loss in the range from 2 GHz to 74 GHz. In: Proceedings of IEEE Globecom Workshops, Washington, 2016. Google Scholar

[26] ITU-R. Effects of Building Materials and Structures on Radiowave Propagation Above about 100 MHz. ITU-R Technical Report P.2040-1. 2015. Google Scholar

[27] Inomata M, Sasaki M, Onizawa T, et al. Effect of reflected waves from outdoor buildings on outdoor-to-indoor path loss in 0.8 to 37 GHz band. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation, Okinawa, 2016. 62--63. Google Scholar

[28] Imai T, Kitao K, Tran N, et al. Outdoor-to-indoor path loss modeling for 0.8 to 37 GHz band. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, Davos, 2016. Google Scholar

[29] Diakhate C A L, Conrat J, Cousin J, et al. Millimeter-wave outdoor-to-indoor channel measurements at 3, 10, 17 and 60 GHz. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, Paris, 2017. 1798--1802. Google Scholar

[30] ITU-R. Prediction of Building Entry Loss. ITU-R Technical Report P.2109-0. 2017. Google Scholar

[31] Study on Channel Model for Frequency from 0.5 to 100 GHz. 3GPP Technical Report 38.901 (V15.0.0). 2018. Google Scholar

[32] Lee J, Kim K, Kim M, et al. Empirical investigation of antenna beamwidth effects on the ITU-R building entry loss (BEL) model based on 32 GHz measurements. In: Proceedings of Global Symposium on Millimeter Waves, Boulder, 2018. Google Scholar

[33] Umit Bas C, Wang R, Sangodoyin S. Outdoor to Indoor Propagation Channel Measurements at 28 GHz. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun, 2019, 18: 1477-1489 CrossRef Google Scholar

[34] Li J, Zhang P, Wang H, et al. High-efficiency millimeter-wave wideband channel measurement system. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, Krakow, 2019. Google Scholar

[35] ITU-R. Multipath Propagation and Parameterization of its Characteristics. ITU-R Technical Report P.1407-6. 2017. Google Scholar

[36] Zhang P Z, Li J, Wang H M, et al. Millimeter-wave space-time propagation characteristics in urban macrocell scenarios. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications, Shanghai, 2019. Google Scholar

[37] Wang H M, Zhang P Z, Li J, et al. Radio propagation and wireless coverage of LSAA-based 5G millimeter-wave mobile communication systems. China Commun, 2019, 16: 1--18. Google Scholar

[38] Samimi M K, Rappaport T S. 3-D Millimeter-Wave Statistical Channel Model for 5G Wireless System Design. IEEE Trans Microwave Theor Techn, 2016, 64: 2207-2225 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[39] Rappaport T S, MacCartney G R, Sun S. Small-Scale, Local Area, and Transitional Millimeter Wave Propagation for 5G Communications. IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat, 2017, 65: 6474-6490 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[40] Shafi M, Zhang J, Tataria H. Microwave vs. Millimeter-Wave Propagation Channels: Key Differences and Impact on 5G Cellular Systems. IEEE Commun Mag, 2018, 56: 14-20 CrossRef Google Scholar

[41] Fleury B H. First- and second-order characterization of direction dispersion and space selectivity in the radio channel. IEEE Trans Inform Theor, 2000, 46: 2027-2044 CrossRef Google Scholar

[42] Du J, Chizhik D, Feick R. Suburban Residential Building Penetration Loss at 28 GHz for Fixed Wireless Access. IEEE Wireless Commun Lett, 2018, 7: 890-893 CrossRef Google Scholar

  • Figure 1

    (Color online) Illustration of a potential mmWave indoor and outdoor cooperative cellular network for in-building coverage, including a highly directional beam in outdoor-to-indoor channels and a wide beam in indoor-to-indoor channels.

  • Figure 2

    (Color online) General plan view of O2I scenario. The TX is mounted on the rooftop of Building A3, and indoor RXs are located on the third floor of Building A5, which are all in the illuminated area.

  • Figure 3

    (Color online) Layout of indoor TX and RX locations, where the red dots and green triangles represent the TX and RX locations for the indoor measurements, respectively.

  • Figure 4

    (Color online) Comparison of the measured directional PDPs for I-RX 5 at 27.5 GHz with bandwidths of 200 (black line) and 600 MHz (gray line).

  • Figure 5

    (Color online) Measured directional and omnidirectional path loss for all I-RX locations, as well as their fitting results. The gray crosses represent the top 80 directional path loss values over all 720 antenna pointing angle combinations (10 AoD $\times$ 36 AoA $\times$ 2 EoA), the blue diamonds represent the path with the strongest received power, i.e., the lowest directional path loss, and the black squares represent omnidirectional path loss. (a) and (b) represent 27.5 GHz with RF bandwidths of 200 and 600 MHz, respectively, as well as (c) and (d) in 39.5 GHz band.

  • Figure 6

    (Color online) Double-directional APS at 27.5 GHz. (a) and (b) for RX 30 with bandwidths of 200 and 600 MHz, respectively, as well as (c) and (d) for RX 5 and (e) and (f) for RX 28.

  • Figure 7

    (Color online) Excess losses relative to free space path losses for all O-RX locations. (a) and (b) at 27.5 GHz with bandwidths of 200 and 600 MHz, respectively, as well as (c) and (d) at 39.5 GHz.

  • Figure 8

    (Color online) Double-directional path loss distributions in the AoA-AoD plane with sounding bandwidth of 200 MHz. (a) 27.5 GHz, O-RX 1; (b) 27.5 GHz, O-RX 2; (c) 39.5 GHz, O-RX 1; (d) 39.5 GHz, O-RX 2.

  • Figure 9

    (Color online) Power ratio of the combined directional beam to the total varying with the number of strongest paths in combination.

  • Table 1  

    Table 1Antenna specifications for mmWave O2I and indoor channel measurements

    Parameter Value
    Carrier frequency 27.5 GHz 39.5 GHz
    TX/RX ant. HPBW$^{\rm~a)}$ ang9.5Az.)/ang9.5El.) ang9.5Az.)/ang9.5El.)
    TX/RX ant. gain 25.6 dB 27.7 dB
    Pol. combination V-V
    TX ant. azimuth angle
    O2I: ang60 with increment of ang10;
    Indoor: ang90 with increment of ang10
    TX ant. elevation angle O2I: $-$ang10; Indoor/penetration: ang0
    RX ant. azimuth angle
    O2I/Indoor: ang360 with increment of ang10
    RX ant. elevation angle$^{\rm~b)}$
    O2I: $-$ang10 ang0 ang10; Indoor: ang0 ang10
  • Table 2  

    Table 2Path loss model parameters in indoor NLOS setting at 27.5 and 39.5 GHz with $d_{\text{BP}}=16.7$ m for part 1 and $d_{\text{BP}}=44.7$ m for part 2

    Frequency
    $\text{(GHz)}$
    $B$
    $\text{(MHz)}$
    ScenarioThe CI path loss modelDual-slope path loss model
    Case 1
    Best direction
    Case 1
    Omnidirection
    Case 2
    Best direction
    Case 2
    Omnidirection
    Case 2
    Best direction
    Case 2
    Omnidirection
    $\alpha_0$ $\sigma_0$ $\alpha_0$ $\sigma_0$ $\alpha_0$ $\sigma_0$ $\alpha_0$ $\sigma_0$ $\alpha_1$ $\beta_1$ $\sigma_1$ $\alpha_1$ $\beta_1$ $\sigma_1$
    27.5200Part 1 3.54.22.92.54.84.34.23.42.4 19.7 3.6 2.4 17.3 1.6
    Part 2 8.5 22.1 1.3 9.6 20.3 1.6
    600Part 1 3.53.92.92.34.83.94.23.32.5 19.7 3.3 2.2 17.7 1.4
    Part 2 9.8 20.4 0.3 10.0 19.9 1.0
    39.5200 Part 1 3.8 4.6 3.2 2.8 5.2 4.4 4.6 2.9 2.9 21.7 3.6 2.5 21.7 1.9
    600 Part 1 3.8 5.5 3.1 3.0 5.2 4.7 4.6 3.2 3.0 22.3 4.1 2.0 22.4 1.7
  • Table 3  

    Table 3Statistics of composite delay and angular spreads in indoor NLoS setting at 27.5 and 39.5 GHz

    Frequency (GHz)27.539.5
    $B$ (MHz)200600200600
    ScenarioCase 1 Case 2 Case 1 Case 2 Case 1 Case 2 Case 1 Case 2
    Composite DS
    $(\log_{10}({\rm~s}))$
    $\mu$ $-$7.2 $-$7.4 $-$7.1 $-$7.2 $-$7.3 $-$7.5 $-$7.2 $-$7.4
    $\sigma$ 0.11 0.12 0.06 0.04 0.06 0.09 0.05 0.08
    Composite ASA
    $(\log_{10}(^\circ))$
    $\mu$ 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.7
    $\sigma$ 0.13 0.03 0.13 0.04 0.13 0.08 0.13 0.06
    Composite ASD
    $(\log_{10}(^\circ))$
    $\mu$ 1.3 1.1 1.3 1.1 1.3 1.1 1.3 1.1
    $\sigma$ 0.09 0.16 0.09 0.16 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08
  • Table 4  

    Table 4Statistics of O2I omnidirectional channel parameters for O-RXs inside the office

    Frequency (GHz)27.539.528[33] 28[42]
    Bandwidth (MHz)200 600 200 600 400 0.02
    BEL (dB)
    Maximum 33.3 32.1 38.6 38.9
    Minimum 16.1 15.1 20.91 19.3
    Average 27.5 25.9 32.3 32.8 22.7 17.1
    Standard 5.3 4.6 4.9 4.9 1.2 2.8
    $\rho_{{\rm~BEL},d_{\rm~in}}$ 0.54 0.49 0.33 0.28
    ASA $(^\circ)$
    Average 83.9 79.1 78.8 63.5 37.5
    Standard 52.6 57.5 51.2 58.8
    ASD $(^\circ)$
    Average 7.6 7.3 7.2 6.8
    Standard 2.0 2.1 2.2 3.0

Copyright 2020  CHINA SCIENCE PUBLISHING & MEDIA LTD.  中国科技出版传媒股份有限公司  版权所有

京ICP备14028887号-23       京公网安备11010102003388号