logo

SCIENTIA SINICA Chimica, Volume 45, Issue 12: 1316-1324(2015) https://doi.org/10.1360/N032015-00149

Comparative study on the methodologies for calculating the excited state in DMRG

More info
  • AcceptedAug 26, 2015
  • PublishedDec 14, 2015

Abstract

Electronic excited state calculation consists of an important issue in theoretical and computational chemistry. Under the Pariser-Parr-Pople (PPP) model and taking polyacenes and polyenes as examples, we compared the accuracy and efficiency of the state specific method and the state average method for the excited state calculation in the density matrix renormalization group formalism. We found that the state specific method can correctly trace the low-lying excited states and can provide more accurate eigen energies than the state average method. Nevertheless, for higher-lying excited states, the state specific method could converge to wrong eigenstates, which should be highly cautioned.


References

[1] a) Shuai ZG, Liu WJ, Liang WZ, Shi Q, Chen H. Theoretical study of the low-lying electronic excited states for molecular aggregates. Sci China Chem, 2013, 56: 1258-1262; b) Shuai ZG, Xu W, Peng Q, Geng H. From electronic excited state theory to the property predictions of organic optoelectronic materials. Sci China Chem, 2013, 56: 1277-1284. Google Scholar

[2] González L, Escudero D, Serrano-Andrés L. Progress and challenges in the calculation of electronic excited states. ChemPhysChem, 2012, 13: 28-51. Google Scholar

[3] Head-Gordon M, Rico RJ, Oumi M, Lee TJ. A doubles correction to electronic excited states from configuration interaction in the space of single substitutions. Chem Phys Lett, 1994, 219: 21-29. Google Scholar

[4] Yang KR, Jalan A, Green WH, Truhlar DG. Which ab initio wave function methods are adequate for quantitative calculations of the energies of biradicals? The performance of coupled-cluster and multi-reference methods along a single-bond dissociation coordinate. J Chem Theory Comput, 2012, 9: 418-431. Google Scholar

[5] Stanton JF, Bartlett RJ. The equation of motion coupled-cluster method. A systematic biorthogonal approach to molecular excitation energies, transition probabilities, and excited state properties. J Chem Phys, 1993, 98: 7029-7039. Google Scholar

[6] Nakatsuji H. Cluster expansion of the wavefunction. Electron correlations in ground and excited states by SAC (symmetry-adapted-cluster) and SAC CI theories. Chem Phys Lett, 1979, 67: 329-333. Google Scholar

[7] Roos BO, Taylor PR, Si PE. A complete active space SCF method (CASSCF) using a density matrix formulated super-CI approach. Chem Phys, 1980, 48: 157-173. Google Scholar

[8] Andersson K, Malmqvist PA, Roos BO, Sadlej AJ, Wolinski K. Second-order perturbation theory with a CASSCF reference function. J Phys Chem, 1990, 94: 5483-5488. Google Scholar

[9] Malmqvist PA, Rendell A, Roos BO. The restricted active space self-consistent-field method, implemented with a split graph unitary group approach. J Phys Chem, 1990, 94: 5477-5482. Google Scholar

[10] Malmqvist PÅ, Pierloot K, Shahi ARM, Cramer CJ, Gagliardi L. The restricted active space followed by second-order perturbation theory method: theory and application to the study of CuO2 and Cu2O2 systems. J Chem Phys, 2008, 128: 204109. Google Scholar

[11] Oddershede J. Propagator methods. In: Lawley KP, Ed. Ab Initio Methods in Quantum Chemistry. New York: Wiley, 2007. Google Scholar

[12] Casida ME. Time-dependent density-functional theory for molecules and molecular solids. Theochem, 2009, 914: 3-18. Google Scholar

[13] Peach MJ, Benfield P, Helgaker T, Tozer DJ. Excitation energies in density functional theory: an evaluation and a diagnostic test. J Chem Phys, 2008, 128: 044118. Google Scholar

[14] Yanai T, Tew DP, Handy NC. A new hybrid exchange-correlation functional using the Coulomb-attenuating method (CAM-B3LYP). Chem Phys Lett, 2004, 393: 51-57. Google Scholar

[15] Peverati R, Truhlar DG. M11-L: a local density functional that provides improved accuracy for electronic structure calculations in chemistry and physics. J Phys Chem Lett, 2011, 3: 117-124. Google Scholar

[16] Schollwöck U. The density-matrix renormalization group. Rev Mod Phys, 2005, 77: 259. Google Scholar

[17] Schollwöck U. The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states. Ann Phys, 2011, 326: 96-192. Google Scholar

[18] Wilson KG. The renormalization group: critical phenomena and the Kondo problem. Rev Mod Phys, 1975, 47: 773. Google Scholar

[19] White SR. Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups. Phys Rev Lett, 1992, 69: 2863. Google Scholar

[20] Shuai Z, Brédas JL, Pati SK, Ramasesha S. Quantum confinement effects on the ordering of the lowest-lying excited states in conjugated polymers. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng, 1997, 3145: 293-302. Google Scholar

[21] Yaron D, Moore EE, Shuai Z, Brédas JL. Comparison of density matrix renormalization group calculations with electron-hole models of exciton binding in conjugated polymers. J Chem Phys, 1998, 108: 7451-7458. Google Scholar

[22] Shuai Z, Pati SK, Bredas JL, Ramasesha S. DMRG studies of the IB exciton binding energy and 1B/2A crossover in an extended Hubbard-Peierls model. Synth Met, 1997, 85: 1011-1014. Google Scholar

[23] Shuai Z, Brédas JL, Saxena A, Bishop AR. Linear and nonlinear optical response of polyenes: a density matrix renormalization group study. J Chem Phys, 1998, 109: 2549-2555. Google Scholar

[24] Ramasesha S, Pati SK, Krishnamurthy HR, Shuai Z, Brédas JL. Low-lying electronic excitations and nonlinear optic properties of polymers via symmetrized Density Matrix Renormalization Group Method. Synth Met, 1997, 85: 1019-1022. Google Scholar

[25] Sleijpen GLG, van der Vorst HA. A Jacobi-Davidson iteration method for linear eigenvalue problems. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl, 1996, 17: 401-425. Google Scholar

[26] Dorando JJ, Hachmann J, Chan GKL. Targeted excited state algorithms. J Chem Phys, 2007, 127: 084109. Google Scholar

[27] Hu W, Chan GKL. Excited state geometry optimization with the density matrix renormalization group as applied to polyenes. J Chem Theory Comput, 2015, 11: 3000-3009. Google Scholar

[28] Davidson ER. Super-matrix methods. Comput Phys Commun, 1989, 53: 49-60. Google Scholar

[29] Pariser R, Parr RG. A semi-empirical theory of the electronic spectra and electronic structure of complex unsaturated molecules. I. J Chem Phys, 1953, 21: 466-471. Google Scholar

[30] Pople JA. Electron interaction in unsaturated hydrocarbons. Trans Faraday Soc, 1953, 49: 1375-1385. Google Scholar

[31] Ohno K. Some remarks on the Pariser-Parr-Pople method. Theor Chim Acta, 1964, 2: 219-227. Google Scholar

[32] Ramasesha S, Pati SK, Krishnamurthy HR, Shuai Z, Bredas JL. Symmetrized density-matrix renormalization-group method for excited states of Hubbard models. Phys Rev B, 1996, 54: 7598-7601. Google Scholar

Copyright 2020 Science China Press Co., Ltd. 《中国科学》杂志社有限责任公司 版权所有

京ICP备18024590号-1