logo

SCIENTIA SINICA Informationis, Volume 48, Issue 7: 743-766(2018) https://doi.org/10.1360/N112017-00272

Study on model reuse for complex system simulation

More info
  • ReceivedDec 10, 2017
  • AcceptedApr 8, 2018
  • PublishedJul 17, 2018

Abstract

In the field of simulation science, model reuse is an important way to improve the efficiency of modeling and the credibility of models in complex systems. It is also a hotspot and difficulty in complex system simulation. In this study, the requirements, concepts, and characteristics are summarized; key research techniques for model reuse for simulation as well as the model reuse knowledge system are given. In addition, a detailed description from the perspective of theory, method, and application is described, and the current model reuse research institute is discussed. Finally, key issues to be studied in the future are indicated.


Funded by

国家自然科学青年基金(61703015)

国家自然科学基金(61374199)


Acknowledgment

感谢北京航空航天大学宋晓, 哈尔滨工业大学杨明、马萍、李伟, 北京电子工程研究所施国强、林廷宇等, 参与了本文相关内容的讨论并提出了许多宝贵意见.


References

[1] Fan W H, Wu J H. Development and future trend of computer simulation and quantum computer simulation. J Syst Simul, 2017, 29: 1161--1167. Google Scholar

[2] Liu X T. Simulation Science and Technology and Engineering. Beijing: Science Press, 2013. Google Scholar

[3] Jamshidi M. Introduction to System of Systems. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2015. Google Scholar

[4] Hu X F. War complexity and issues in the SoS simulation research. Mil Oper Res Syst Eng, 2010, 24: 27--34. Google Scholar

[5] Jin W X, Xiao T Y. Simulation on evolutive behavior of system-of-systems (SoS) created for net-centric operations (NCO) based on complex system theory. J Syst Simul, 2010, 22: 2435--2445. Google Scholar

[6] Xu G B, Zeng L Z. Development tendency of digital simulation. Comput Simul, 2013, 30: 1--3. Google Scholar

[7] Fujimoto R, Bock C, Chen W, et al. Research Challenges in Modeling & Simulation for Engineering Complex Systems. Berlin: Springer, 2017. Google Scholar

[8] Lei Y L. Simulation model reuse theory and approaches with heterogeneous integration support. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2006. Google Scholar

[9] Overstreet C M, Nance R E, Balci O. Issues in enhancing model reuse. 2002. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6473/3f3741c39579e84cfbba41bd873e665db07e.pdf. Google Scholar

[10] Petty M D, Weisel E W. A formal basis for a theory of semantic composability. In: Proceedings of the Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando, 2003. Google Scholar

[11] Pidd M. Simulation software and model reuse: a polemic. In: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, San Diego, 2002. Google Scholar

[12] Liang Y Z, Zhang W S, Kang X Y, et al. A survey of model reuse methods. J Comput Simul, 2008, 25: 1--5. Google Scholar

[13] Ma Q F, Zhang W M, Xu H H. Research on technologies of simulation model reuse. In: Proceedings of Image Graphics Technology and Application Conference, Beijing, 2008. Google Scholar

[14] Balci O, Arthur J D, Ormsby W F. Achieving reusability and composability with a simulation conceptual model. J Simul, 2011, 5: 157-165 CrossRef Google Scholar

[15] Li W H, Li M, Zhao P, et al. Reusability assessment of simulation conceptual model. J Command Control Simul, 2012, 34: 92--96. Google Scholar

[16] Petty M D. Verification, Validation and Accreditation. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2010. Google Scholar

[17] Robinson S, Nance R E, Paul R J. Simulation model reuse: definitions, benefits and obstacles. Simul Model Pract Theory, 2004, 12: 479-494 CrossRef Google Scholar

[18] Keswani R, Joshi S, Jatain A. Software reuse in practice. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Advanced Computing & Communication Technologies, Rohtak, 2014. 159--162. Google Scholar

[19] ?ren T I, Zeigler B P. Concepts for advanced simulation methodologies. Simulation, 1979, 32: 69-82 CrossRef Google Scholar

[20] Huhn R, Mensh D R, Nance R, et al. Issues in simulation model integration, reusability and adaptability. In: Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Winter Simulation, Washington, 1986. Google Scholar

[21] Zuo D L. Research on resource reuse technology in virtual simulation. Dissertation for Master Degree. Guangzhou: Guangdong University of Technology, 2008. Google Scholar

[22] Morse K L. Data and metadata requirements for composable mission space environments. In: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, Washington, 2004. 271--278. Google Scholar

[23] Saulnier E T, Bortscheller B J. Simulation model reusability. IEEE Commun Mag, 1994, 32: 64-69 CrossRef Google Scholar

[24] Pos A, Borst P, Top J. Reusability of simulation models. Knowl-Based Syst, 1996, 9: 119-125 CrossRef Google Scholar

[25] Pace D K. Simulation conceptual model development issues and implications for reuse of simulation components. In: Proceedings of the 2000 Fall Simulation Conference, Orlando, 2000. Google Scholar

[26] Petty M D, Weisel E W, Mielke R R. Computational complexity of selecting components for composition. In: Proceedings of the Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando, 2003. 14--19. Google Scholar

[27] Tolk A, Muguira J A. The levels of conceptual interoperability model. In: Proceedings of the Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando, 2003. 127--130. Google Scholar

[28] Yilmaz L. On the need for contextualized introspective models to improve reuse and composability of defense simulations. J Defense Model Simul, 2004, 1: 141-151 CrossRef Google Scholar

[29] Malak R J J, Paredis C J J. Foundations of validating reusable behavioral models in engineering design problems. In: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, Washington, 2004. 420--428. Google Scholar

[30] Hofmann M A. Modeling assumptions: how they affect validation and interoperability. In: Proceedings of the European Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Toulouse, 2005. Google Scholar

[31] Wang W P, Zhou D X, Li Q, et al. Multi-level framework for composable simulation based on mda. J Syst Simul, 2007, 19: 4358--4362. Google Scholar

[32] Bell D, Cesare S D, Lycett M, et al. A web services component discovery and deployment architecture for simulation model reuse. research areas. 2006.. Google Scholar

[33] Zhang L. Model engineering for complex system simulation. In: New Ideas, New Theories, Academic Salon Anthology 58: Puzzle and Thinking of Complex System Modeling and Simulation, 2011. Google Scholar

[34] Zeigler B P, Zhang L. Service-Oriented Model Engineering and Simulation for System of Systems Engineering, in Concepts and Methodologies for Modeling and Simulation. Berlin: Springer, 2015. Google Scholar

[35] Zhang L, Zhang X S, Song X, et al. Model engineering for complex system simulation. J Syst Simul, 2013, 25: 2719--2736. Google Scholar

[36] Tolk A, Mittal S. A necessary paradigm change to enable composable cloud-based M&S services. In: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, Savanah, 2014. 356--366. Google Scholar

[37] Fujimoto R M. Research challenges in parallel and distributed simulation. ACM Trans Model Comput Simul, 2016, 26: 1-29 CrossRef Google Scholar

[38] Xiong S. Reusability implementation method of large-scale simulation model architecture. J Mordern Navigation, 2016, 7: 131--136. Google Scholar

[39] Bocciarelli P, D'Ambrogio A, Mastromattei A, et al. Automated development of web-based modeling services for MSaaS platforms. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Model-driven Approaches for Simulation Engineering, Virginia Beach, 2017. Google Scholar

[40] Deng Y, Liu X Y. Research on microservice architecture modeling based on interactive flow modeling language. Softw Guide, 2018, 1: 165--168. Google Scholar

[41] Hawryszkiewycz I T. A meta model for modeling collaborative systems. J Comput Inf Syst, 2016, 45: 63--72. Google Scholar

[42] Wang J, Beu J, Yalamanchili S, et al. Designing configurable, modifiable and reusable components for simulation of multicore systems. In: Proceedings of High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage & Analysis, Salt Lake City, 2013. 472--476. Google Scholar

[43] Scrudder R, Saunders R, Möller B, et al. IEEE Standard for Modeling and Simulation (M&S) High Level Architecture (HLA) — Federate Interface Specification. IEEE Std 1516.1-2000, 2010. Google Scholar

[44] Peng G Z, Mao H C, Wang H W. BOM-based design knowledge representation and reasoning for collaborative product development. J Syst Sci Syst Eng, 2016, 25: 159-176 CrossRef Google Scholar

[45] Pan Q H, Zhang H J, Zhang T F. Study on simulation modeling based on MDA & HLA. J Syst Simul, 2010, 22: 1169--1173. Google Scholar

[46] Nemeth S, Demarest P. Research and development in application of the simulation model portability standard. In: Proceedings of SpaceOps 2010 Conference Delivering on the Dream Hosted by NASA Marshall Space Flight Center and Organized by AIAA, Huntsville, 2010. Google Scholar

[47] Lei Y L, Su N L, Li J J, et al. New simulation model representation specification SMP2 and its key application techniques. Syst Eng-Theory Pract, 2010, 31: 553--572. Google Scholar

[48] Kalman M, Havasi F. Enhanced XML validation using SRML. Int J Web Semant Technol, 2013, 4: 1-18 CrossRef Google Scholar

[49] Fritzson P A. Principles of Object-Oriented Modeling and Simulation with Modelica 3.3. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2014. Google Scholar

[50] Kilgore R A. Open source simulation modeling language (SML). In: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, Arlington, 2001. 607--613. Google Scholar

[51] Rosa W, Packard T, Krupanand A. COTS integration and estimation for ERP. J Syst Softw, 2013, 86: 538-550 CrossRef Google Scholar

[52] Whalen M W, Murugesan A, Rayadurgam S, et al. Structuring simulink models for verification and reuse. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Modeling in Software Engineering, Hyderabad, 2014. 19--24. Google Scholar

[53] Bell D, de Cesare S, Lycett M, et al. Semantic web service architecture for simulation model reuse. In: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real-Time Applications, Chania, 2007. 129--136. Google Scholar

[54] Tounsi I, Hrichi Z, Kacem M H, et al. Using SoaML models and Event-B specifications for modeling SOA design patterns. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Angers, 2013. 294--301. Google Scholar

[55] Hu J P, Huang L P, Cao B, et al. Executable modeling approach to service oriented architecture using SoaML in conjunction with extended DEVSML. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, Anchorage, 2014. 243--250. Google Scholar

[56] Wang S X, Wainer G. A mashup architecture with modeling and simulation as a service. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering, Miami, 2015. Google Scholar

[57] Hu Y, Xiao J, Zhao H, et al. DEVSMO: an ontology of DEVS model representation for model reuse. In: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, Washington, 2013. 4002--4003. Google Scholar

[58] Ju R S, Yang M, Zhong R H, et al. Summary of service oriented modeling and simulation. J Syst Eng Electron, 2013, 35: 1539--1546. Google Scholar

[59] Guo X F. Research on key technologies of distributed simulation based on SOA and HLA. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. Zhengzhou: PLA Information Engineering University, 2011. Google Scholar

[60] Chen P. Research on UAV distributed cooperative simulation. Dissertation for Master Degree. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics, 2016. Google Scholar

[61] Peng G Z, Mao H C, Zhang H M. BMRSS: BOM-based multi-resolution simulation system using components. In: Proceedings of Asian Simulation Conference, Singapore, 2013. 485--496. Google Scholar

[62] Zhao J C, Huang L P, Chen J Y, et al. Model reuse oriented simulation cloud service platform design and implementation. J Graph, 2017, 6: 857--864. Google Scholar

[63] Rao D H, Hu X F, Wu L. Research of model integration oriented framework for distributed DEVS/HLA simulation. In: Proceedings of the 14th Chinese Conference on System Simulation Technology and Application, Sanya, 2012. Google Scholar

[64] Kang X Y. Research on reuse and combination of key technologies of simulation models. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2012. Google Scholar

[65] Banks J, Carson J S, Nelson B L, et al. Discrete Event System Simulation. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2010. Google Scholar

[66] Barker M, Zupick N. Revisiting the four CS of managing a successful simulation project. In: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, Las Vegas, 2017. 580--587. Google Scholar

[67] Balci O. Golden rules of verification, validation, testing, and certification of modeling and simulation applications. SCS M&S Mag, 2010, 4: 1--7. Google Scholar

[68] Balci O. A life cycle for modeling and simulation. Simulation, 2012, 88: 870-883 CrossRef Google Scholar

[69] Li T, Li B H, Chai X D, et al. Meta modeling framework for complex product multidiscipline virtual prototyping. J Comput Integr Manuf Syst, 2011, 17: 1178--1186. Google Scholar

[70] Li T, Li B H, Chai X D. Layered simulation service description framework oriented to cloud simulation. J Comput Integr Manuf Syst, 2012, 18: 2091--2098. Google Scholar

[71] Zeigler B P, Praehofer H, Kim T G. Theory of Modeling and Simulation: Integrating Discrete Event and Continuous Complex Dynamic Systems. San Diego: Academic Press, 2000. Google Scholar

[72] Zeigler B P, Nutaro J J. Towards a framework for more robust validation and verification of simulation models for systems of systems. J Defense Model Simul, 2016, 13: 3-16 CrossRef Google Scholar

[73] Zhang X J, Xia H M, Xie G X, et al. Design and implementation of integrated tactical simulation system based on HLA. J Syst Simul, 2010, 22: 2241--2245. Google Scholar

[74] IEEE. IEEE Standard for Modeling and Simulation (M&S) High Level Architecture (HLA) — Framework and Rules. IEEE 1516-2000, 2000. http://standards.ieee.org/findstds/standard/1516-2000.html. Google Scholar

[75] IEEE. IEEE Standard for Modeling and Simulation (M&S) High Level Architecture (HLA) — Object Model Template (OMT) Specification. IEEE Std 1516.2-2000, 2001. http://standards.ieee.org/findstds/standard/1516.2-2000.html. Google Scholar

[76] IEEE. IEEE Standard for Modeling and Simulation (M&S) High Level Architecture (HLA) — Framework and Rules. IEEE Std 1516-2010, 2010. http://standards.ieee.org/findstds/standard/1516-2010.html. Google Scholar

[77] Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization (SISO). Base Object Model (BOM) Template Specification. SISO-STD-003.1-DRAFT-V0.12, 2006. https://www.sisostds.org/DigitalLibrary.aspx?Command_Core~Download\&EntryId=30820. Google Scholar

[78] Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization (SISO). Guide for Base Object Model (BOM) Use and Implementation. SISO-STD-003.1-2006, 2006. https://www.sisostds.org/DigitalLibrary.aspx?Command_Core~Download\&EntryId=30819. Google Scholar

[79] Yi J, Ma Y P, Zhu B. Research on composition model description method based on BOM. In: Proceedings of 2013 China Command and Control Conference, Beijing, 2013. Google Scholar

[80] Van Tendeloo Y, Vangheluwe H. An evaluation of DEVS simulation tools. Simulation, 2017, 93: 103-121 CrossRef Google Scholar

[81] Zeigler B P, Sarjoughian H S, Duboz R, et al. Guide to Modeling and Simulation of Systems of Systems. Berlin: Springer, 2013. Google Scholar

[82] Schmidt A, Durak U, Rasch C, et al. Model-based testing approach for MATLAB/simulink using system entity structure and experimental frames. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Modeling & Simulation: DEVS Integrative M&S Symposium, Alexandria, 2015. 69--76. Google Scholar

[83] Tolk A. The next generation of modeling & simulation: integrating big data and deep learning. In: Proceedings of Conference on Summer Computer Simulation, Chicago, 2015. Google Scholar

[84] Balci O, Ball G L, Morse K L, et al. Model reuse, composition, and adaptation. In: Research Challenges in Modeling and Simulation for Engineering Complex Systems. Berlin: Springer, 2017. Google Scholar

[85] Foster S, Thiele B, Cavalcanti A, et al. Towards a UTP semantics for modelica. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Unifying Theories of Programming, Reykjavik, 2016. 44--64. Google Scholar

[86] Friedenthal S, Moore A, Steiner R. A practical guide to SysML. Jung Inst Libr J, 2012, 17: 41--46. Google Scholar

[87] Peng Y, Zhong R H, Huang J, et al. Semantic extended representation approach of DEVS model. J Syst Simul, 2010, 22: 2519--2523. Google Scholar

[88] Seo C, Zeigler B P, Coop R, et al. DEVS modeling and simulation methodology with MS4 Me software tool. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Modeling & Simulation, San Diego, 2014. Google Scholar

[89] Shi Y, Dong H Q, Lu M H. Research on simulation composability and reusability based on SOA. J Syst Simul, 2014, 26: 1522--1526. Google Scholar

[90] Cai Y. Service-oriented simulation supports key environmental technology research. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2014. Google Scholar

[91] Wang W P, Wang C, Li Q. Simulation model portability modeling and simulation framework based on service oriented architecture. J Comput Integr Manuf Syst, 2011, 17: 2723--2731. Google Scholar

[92] Albagli A N, Falc?o D M, de Rezende J F. Smart grid framework co-simulation using HLA architecture. Electric Power Syst Res, 2016, 130: 22-33 CrossRef Google Scholar

[93] Ribault J, Zacharewicz G. Time-based orchestration of workflow, interoperability with G-Devs/Hla. J Comput Sci, 2015, 10: 126-136 CrossRef Google Scholar

[94] Gao W Q, Kang F J, Zhong L J, et al. Cloud simulation technology based on HLA evolved. J Syst Simul, 2011, 23: 1643--1647. Google Scholar

[95] Katherine D, Morse L, Tolk D A, et al. XMSF as an enabler for NATO M&S. In: Proceedings of NATO Modeling and Simulation Group Conference, Koblenz, 2004. Google Scholar

[96] Kim T, Seo C, Zeigler B P. Web-based distributed network analyzer using a system entity structure over a service-oriented architecture. Simulation, 2010, 86: 155-180 CrossRef Google Scholar

[97] Seo C, Zeigler B P. Simulation model standardization through web services: interoperation and federation on the DEVS/SOA platform. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Modeling and Simulation, Orlando, 2012. Google Scholar

[98] Muqsith M A, Sarjoughian H S, Huang D Z. Simulating adaptive service-oriented software systems. Simulation, 2011, 87: 915-931 CrossRef Google Scholar

[99] Bergero F, Kofman E. PowerDEVS: a tool for hybrid system modeling and real-time simulation. Simulation, 2011, 87: 113-132 CrossRef Google Scholar

[100] Langer P. Adaptable model versioning based on model transformation by demonstration. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. Wien: Vienna University of Technology, 2011. Google Scholar

[101] Kappel G, Langer P, Retschitzegger W, et al. Model transformation by-example: a survey of the first wave. In: Conceptual Modelling and its Theoretical Foundations. Berlin: Springer, 2012. 197--215. Google Scholar

[102] Liu H B, Su H Y, Zhang Y B, et al. Study on virtualization-based simulation grid. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation, Changsha, 2010. 685--689. Google Scholar

[103] Gao W Q, Kang F J, Zhong L J, et al. Cloud simulation technology based on HLA evolved. J Syst Simul, 2011, 23: 1643--1647. Google Scholar

[104] Cayirci E. Modeling and simulation as a cloud service: a survey. In: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, Washington, 2013. 389--400. Google Scholar

[105] Cayirci E. Configuration schemes for modeling and simulation as a service federation. Simulation, 2013, 89: 1388-1399 CrossRef Google Scholar

[106] Calheiros R N, Ranjan R, de Rose C A F, et al. CloudSim: a novel framework for modeling and simulation of cloud computing infrastructures and services. Comput Sci, 2009,. arXiv Google Scholar

[107] Taylor S J E, Khan A, Morse K L, et al. Grand challenges on the theory of modeling and simulation. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Modeling & Simulation-DEVS Integrative M&S Symposium, San Diego, 2013. Google Scholar

[108] Onggo S, Taylor S, Tulegenov A. The need for cloud-based simulation from the perspective of simulation practitioners. In: Proceedings of the 7th Operational Research Society Simulation Workshop, Worcestershire, 2014. Google Scholar

[109] Bitterman T, Calyam P, Berryman A. Simulation as a service (SMaaS): a cloud-based framework to support the educational use of scientific software. Int J Cloud Comput, 2014, 3: 177-190 CrossRef Google Scholar

[110] Siegfried R, Tom V D B, Cramp A, et al. M&S as a service: expectations and challenges. In: Proceedings of 2014 Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshops, Orlando, 2014. Google Scholar

[111] NATO STO. Final Report of NATO MSG-131 “Modelling and Simulation as a Service: New Concepts and Service Oriented Architectures". STO Technical Report STO-TR-MSG-131. Google Scholar

[112] Wang S X, Wainer G. A simulation as a service methodology with application for crowd modeling, simulation and visualization. Simulation, 2015, 91: 71-95 CrossRef Google Scholar

[113] Wainer G, Wang S X. MAMS: mashup architecture with modeling and simulation as a service. J Comput Sci, 2017, 21: 113-131 CrossRef Google Scholar

[114] Li B H, Chai X D, Hou B C, et al. Networked modeling & simulation platform based on concept of cloud computing cloud simulation platform. J Syst Simul, 2009, 21: 5292--5299. Google Scholar

[115] Li B H, Chai X D, Zhang L, et al. New advances of the research on cloud simulation. In: Advanced Methods, Techniques, and Applications in Modeling and Simulation. Berlin: Springer, 2012. 144--163. Google Scholar

[116] Li B H, Chai X D, Hou B, et al. Cloud simulation platform. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Grand Challenges in Modeling & Simulation Conference, Istanbul, 2009. 303--307. Google Scholar

[117] Liu J J, Yu Y L, Zhang L. An overview of conceptual model for simulation and its validation. Procedia Eng, 2011, 24: 152-158 CrossRef Google Scholar

[118] Ayadi M, Affonso R C, Cheutet V. Conceptual model for management of digital factory simulation information. Int J Simul Model, 2013, 12: 107-119 CrossRef Google Scholar

[119] Gracia J, Liem J, Lozano E, et al. Semantic techniques for enabling knowledge reuse in conceptual modelling. In: Proceedings of International Semantic Web Conference, Shanghai, 2010. 82--97. Google Scholar

[120] Robinson S. Conceptual Modeling for Simulation. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2010. Google Scholar

[121] Fillottrani P R, Keet C M. Conceptual model interoperability: a metamodel-driven approach. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Rules and Rule Markup Languages for the Semantic Web, Prague, 2014. Google Scholar

[122] Seo K M, Hong W, Kim T G. Enhancing model composability and reusability for entity-level combat simulation: a conceptual modeling approach. Simulation, 2017, 93: 825-840 CrossRef Google Scholar

  • Figure 1

    Classification of model reuse methods

  • Figure 2

    (Color online) The development of model reuse

  • Figure 3

    (Color online) The evolution of model reuse

  • Figure 4

    (Color online) The model reuse knowledge system framework

  • Figure 5

    Model reuse key technologies research

  • Figure 6

    The reuse-oriented modeling and simulation concept framework

  • Table 1   Model reuse key technology comparison
    Reuse Standards Foucs on Technical Portability Reusable Reuse phase Reuse-oriented
    methods features level modeling ideas
    Reuse based HLA/BOM Unified model Openful, Well Multi-level Design Better
    on model /SMP2 etc. interface standardi- reuse
    standardization zation
    technology
    Reuse based SRML/SML Unified model Platform- Better Multi-level Implement General
    on model /SysML etc. representation independent, reuse
    representation multi-domain
    technology support
    Reuse of build- COTS Unified model Internal General Single-level Execute General
    ing technology /OneSAF etc. interface model library reuse
    based on model-
    ing and simulat-
    ion environment
    Reuse tech- Conceptual Unified concep- Generalization Well Single-level Requirement Well
    nology based model tual modeling and abstraction reuse or design
    on conceptual standard method
    model system
    Service-oriented HLA/SOA Unified service Servitization Better Single-level Design or Better
    model reuse DEVS/SOA ideas reuse execute
    etc.
    Cloud-based MSaaS etc. Unified concep- Standardi- General Multi-level Implement Better
    model reuse tual framework zation reuse or execute

Copyright 2019 Science China Press Co., Ltd. 《中国科学》杂志社有限责任公司 版权所有

京ICP备18024590号-1