SCIENTIA SINICA Informationis, Volume 48, Issue 12: 1603-1613(2018) https://doi.org/10.1360/N112018-00153

The architecture and technology of cognitive electronic warfare

More info
  • ReceivedJun 13, 2018
  • AcceptedAug 1, 2018
  • PublishedNov 27, 2018


Development and applications of technologies of cognitive radio, software-defined network, cognitive network as well as anti-jamming and low intercept probability in radar and other communication systems have led to an exponential increase in the complexity of the electromagnetic environment. When confronted with the challenges in the future complicated battlefield environment, how to speed up the loop of “observe-orient-decide-act (OODA)” and realize electromagnetic agility is the key problem for electronic warfare system. To make the system more cognitive, we combine the theory of artificial intelligence with electronic warfare, which can significantly enhance the ability to sense a threat signal, make a jamming decision, and evaluate the jamming effect. Moreover, this will shorten the reaction time to unknown threats, speed up the OODA loop, and strengthen the operational capability of the system.


[1] 熊群力. 综合电子战 -- 信息化战争的杀手锏. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2008. Google Scholar

[2] Wu L M, Wang M X, Chen G, et al. Introduction to cognitive radio and communication electronic warfare. Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2015. Google Scholar

[3] Zhang K, Zhang X, Jin J C. Preliminary exploration of cognitive electronic warfare. Aero Elec Warfare, 2013, 29: 53--56. Google Scholar

[4] DARPA. Behavioral learning for adaptive electronic warfare (BLADE) broad agency announcement (BAA). DARPA-BAA-10-79, 2010-07-09. http://www.darpa.mil/i2o/ solicit /solicit-closed.asp. Google Scholar

[5] Lee-Urban S, Trewhitt E, Bieder I, et al. CORA: a flexible hybrid approach to building cognitive systems. In: Proceedings of Annual Conference on Advances in Cognitive Systems, 2015. 1--16. Google Scholar

[6] DARPA. Adaptive radar countermeasures (ARC) broad agency announcement (BAA). DARPA-BAA-12-54, 2012-08-27. http://www.darpa.mil. Google Scholar

[7] AFRL. Cognitive jammer. RFI-PKS-0001-2010, 2010. http://www.fbo.gov.2010. Google Scholar

[8] NAVY. Cognitive electronic warfare program. ONRBAA13-005, 2013. http://www.onr.navy.mil/Contracts-Grants/Funding-Opportunities/Broad-Agency-Announcements.aspx. Google Scholar

[9] Ni C Y, Huang H. Research into the composition and crucial technologies of cognitive electronic warfare system. Shipboard Elec Countermeasure, 2013, 36: 32--35. Google Scholar

[10] Fan Z L, Zhu G S, Hu Y K. An overview of cognitive electronic warfare. Elec Inf Warfare Tech, 2015, 30: 33--38. Google Scholar

[11] Gavrilovska L, Atanasovski V, Macaluso I. Learning and Reasoning in Cognitive Radio Networks. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials, 2013, 15: 1761-1777 CrossRef Google Scholar

[12] Lau K W, Wu Q H. Online training of support vector classifier. Pattern Recognition, 2003, 36: 1913-1920 CrossRef Google Scholar

[13] Masud M M, Chen Q, Khan L. Classification and Adaptive Novel Class Detection of Feature-Evolving Data Streams. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng, 2013, 25: 1484-1497 CrossRef Google Scholar

[14] Mu X, Zhu F, Du J, et al. Streaming classification with emerging new class by class matrix sketching. In: Proceedings of the 31st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, 2017. 2373--2379. Google Scholar

[15] Sutton R S, Barto A G. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. Cambridge: IMIT Press, 1998. Google Scholar

[16] Liu C F, Zhao Z Y. Method of evaluating countermeasure effectiveness for an adaptive nulling antenna based on the analytic hierarchy process. J Xidian Univ (Nat Sci), 2015, 42: 25--31. Google Scholar

[17] 张剑. 军事装备系统效能分析、优化与仿真. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2002. Google Scholar

[18] 张杰儒. 电子对抗系统干扰效果估计. 航空与航天, 1997, 3: 12--17. Google Scholar

Copyright 2020 Science China Press Co., Ltd. 《中国科学》杂志社有限责任公司 版权所有

京ICP备18024590号-1       京公网安备11010102003388号