SCIENTIA SINICA Informationis, Volume 49, Issue 8: 963-987(2019) https://doi.org/10.1360/N112019-00033

6G mobile communication networks: vision, challenges, and key technologies

More info
  • ReceivedFeb 12, 2019
  • AcceptedMay 9, 2019
  • PublishedAug 2, 2019


While scaled-up commercial 5G networks are currently being deployed around the world, increasing numbers of researchers and organizations have already begun to consider the next generation of mobile communication systems. This article explores the 6G concept for the 2030s and provides some directional guidance for subsequent research. The vision for future 6G systems is characterized by the key terms, "Intelligent Connectivity," "Deep Connectivity," "Holographic Connectivity," and "Ubiquitous Connectivity," which constitute the overall slogan of "Wherever you think, everything follows your heart." The technical requirements and challenges, including peak throughput, higher energy efficiency, connection everywhere and every time, new theories and technologies, self-aggregating communication fabrics, and some non-technical challenges, of realizing this vision are analyzed. Then, the potential key technologies are classified and presented: communication technologies on new spectrums, including terahertz and visible light communications; fundamental technologies, including sparse theory (compressed sensing), new channel coding technology, large-scale antenna, flexible spectrum usage, and AI-based wireless communications; special technical features, including Space-Air-Ground-Sea integrated communications and wireless tactile networks.


[1] TSG RAN, RP-180516 Report of 3GPP TSG RAN meeting #78, in Lisbon, Portugal, December 18 - 21, 2017. Google Scholar

[2] TSG RAN. RP-181999 Report of 3GPP TSG RAN meeting #80, in La Jolla, USA, June 11 - 14, 2018. Google Scholar

[3] Balazs Bertenyi, Chairman 3GPP TSG RAN. RAN adjusts schedule for 2nd wave of 5G specifications. http://www.3gpp.org/news-events/3gpp-news/2005-ran_r16_schedule, 3GPP RAN#82, December 14, 2018. Google Scholar

[4] TSG RAN. draft_MeetingReport_RAN_82_181213_eom, 3GPP RAN82, December 14, 2018. Google Scholar

[5] Beyond 5G: The Roadmap to 6G and beyond. https://www.cablefree.net/wireless-technology/4g-lte-beyond-5g-roadmap-6g-beyond/, Posted Jul 4, 2017Jan 18, 2018. Google Scholar

[6] Focus Group on Technologies for Network 2030. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/focusgroups/net2030/Pages/ default.aspx, July 2018. Google Scholar

[7] University of Oulu Works On 6G. https://www.cdrinfo.com/d7/content/university-oulu-works-6g, Sep 17, 2018. Google Scholar

[8] FCC's Rosenworcel Talks Up 6G. https://www.multichannel.com/news/fccs-rosenworcel-talks-up-6g, SEP 14, 2018. Google Scholar

[9] Swaroop A S, Mohamed J G, Niaz Ahamed V M. Full duplex radio-wave transmission for 6G Internet (6G connectivity). Int J Recent Trends Eng Res, 2017, 3: 201-208 CrossRef Google Scholar

[10] Huang Y H, Wang X Y, Liu G Y. Overview of 5G mobile communication system. Appl Electron Tech, 2017, 43: 3--7. Google Scholar

[11] TR 38.821 V0.4.0 (2019-03). Solutions for NR to support non-terrestrial networks (NTN) (Release 16). Google Scholar

[12] Luong N C, Hoang D T, Wang P. Data Collection and Wireless Communication in Internet of Things (IoT) Using Economic Analysis and Pricing Models: A Survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials, 2016, 18: 2546-2590 CrossRef Google Scholar

[13] Park T, Abuzainab N, Saad W. Learning How to Communicate in the Internet of Things: Finite Resources and Heterogeneity. IEEE Access, 2016, 4: 7063-7073 CrossRef Google Scholar

[14] O'Shea T J, Hoydis J. An introduction to machine learning communications systems. 2017,. arXiv Google Scholar

[15] Sun H, Chen X, Shi Q, et al. Learning to optimize: training deep neural networks for wireless resource management. 2017,. arXiv Google Scholar

[16] Jiang C, Zhang H, Ren Y. Machine Learning Paradigms for Next-Generation Wireless Networks. IEEE Wireless Commun, 2017, 24: 98-105 CrossRef Google Scholar

[17] Bkassiny M, Li Y, Jayaweera S K. A Survey on Machine-Learning Techniques in Cognitive Radios. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials, 2013, 15: 1136-1159 CrossRef Google Scholar

[18] Kato N, Fadlullah Z M, Mao B. The Deep Learning Vision for Heterogeneous Network Traffic Control: Proposal, Challenges, and Future Perspective. IEEE Wireless Commun, 2017, 24: 146-153 CrossRef Google Scholar

[19] Alsheikh M A, Lin S, Niyato D. Machine Learning in Wireless Sensor Networks: Algorithms, Strategies, and Applications. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials, 2014, 16: 1996-2018 CrossRef Google Scholar

[20] Zhang Y, Meratnia N, Havinga P. Outlier Detection Techniques for Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials, 2010, 12: 159-170 CrossRef Google Scholar

[21] Di M, Joo E M. A survey of machine learning in wireless sensor netoworks from networking and application perspectives. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Information, Communications & Signal Processing, Singapore, 2007. Google Scholar

[22] Neal R M. Bayesian Learning for Neural Networks. Berlin: Springer, 2012. Google Scholar

[23] Rojas R. Neural Networks: a Systematic Introduction. Berlin: Springer, 2013. Google Scholar

[24] Hagan M T, Demuth H B, Beale M H, et al. Neural Network Design. Martin Hagan, 2014. Google Scholar

[25] Schmidhuber J. Deep learning in neural networks: an overview.. Neural Networks, 2015, 61: 85-117 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[26] Carbonell J G, Michalski R S, Mitchell T M. An overview of machine learning. In: Machine Learning. Belrin: Springer, 1983. 3--23. Google Scholar

[27] Schapire R E. The boosting approach to machine learning: an overview. In: Nonlinear Estimation and Classification. Belrin: Springer, 2003. 149--171. Google Scholar

[28] Basegmez E. The next generation neural networks: Deep learning and spiking neural networks. In: Advanced Seminar in Technical University of Munich, 2014. 1--40. Google Scholar

[29] You X, Zhang C, Tan X. AI for 5G: research directions and paradigms. Sci Sin-Inf, 2018, 48: 1589-1602 CrossRef Google Scholar

[30] Kibria M G, Nguyen K, Villardi G P. Big Data Analytics, Machine Learning, and Artificial Intelligence in Next-Generation Wireless Networks. IEEE Access, 2018, 6: 32328-32338 CrossRef Google Scholar

[31] Sylvie Barak. Is So Near-Future: A Look Ahead to 6G and 7G. 2018. https://iconsofinfrastructure.com/5g-is-so-near-future-a-look-ahead-to-6g-and-7g/. Google Scholar

[32] Bastug E, Bennis M, Medard M. Toward Interconnected Virtual Reality: Opportunities, Challenges, and Enablers. IEEE Commun Mag, 2017, 55: 110-117 CrossRef Google Scholar

[33] Weissmann J, Salomon R. Gesture recognition for virtual reality applications using data gloves and neural networks. In: Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Washington, 1999. Google Scholar

[34] Xu D Y. A neural network approach for hand gesture recognition in virtual reality driving training system of SPG. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Pattern Recognition, (ICPR), Hong Kong, 2006. Google Scholar

[35] Hambli R, Chamekh A, Bel Hadj Salah H. Real-time deformation of structure using finite element and neural networks in virtual reality applications. Finite Elem Anal Des, 2006, 42: 985-991 CrossRef Google Scholar

[36] Raghavan V, Li J. Evolution of Physical-Layer Communications Research in the Post-5G Era. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 10392-10401 CrossRef Google Scholar

[37] Ma Z, Zhang Z Q, Ding Z G. Key techniques for 5G wireless communications: network architecture, physical layer, and MAC layer perspectives. Sci China Inf Sci, 2015, 58: 1-20 CrossRef Google Scholar

[38] 闵士权. 再论我国天地一体化综合信息网络构想. 卫星通信学术年会, 2016. Google Scholar

[39] Wells J. Faster than fiber: The future of multi-G/s wireless. IEEE Microwave, 2009, 10: 104-112 CrossRef Google Scholar

[40] Donoho D L. Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans Inform Theor, 2006, 52: 1289-1306 CrossRef Google Scholar

[41] Candès E, Romberg J, Tao T. Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements. Comm Pure Appl Math, 2006, 59: 1207-1223 CrossRef Google Scholar

[42] Oppenheim A V, Schafer R W. Discrete-time Signal Processing. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2010. Google Scholar

[43] Xiao S, Li T, Yan Y. Compressed sensing in wireless sensor networks under complex conditions of Internet of things. Cluster Comput, 2018, 21 CrossRef Google Scholar

[44] Choi J W, Shim B, Ding Y C, et al. Compressed sensing for wireless communications: useful tips and tricks. 2016,. arXiv Google Scholar

[45] Eldar Y C, Kutyniok G. Compressed Sensing: Theory and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Google Scholar

[46] Candes E J, Wakin M B. An Introduction To Compressive Sampling. IEEE Signal Process Mag, 2008, 25: 21-30 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[47] Han Z, Li H, Yin W. Compressive Sensing for Wireless Networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. Google Scholar

[48] Safarpour M, Inanlou R, Charmi M. ADC-Assisted Random Sampler Architecture for Efficient Sparse Signal Acquisition. IEEE Trans VLSI Syst, 2018, 26: 1590-1594 CrossRef Google Scholar

[49] Szabo D, Gulyas A, Fitzek F H P, et al. Towards the tactile Internet: decreasing communication latency with network coding and software defined networking. In: Proceedings of the 21th European Wireless Conference, Budapest, 2015. Google Scholar

[50] Huang L C, Zhang H Z, Li R, et al. AI coding: learning to construct error correction codes. 2019,. arXiv Google Scholar

[51] Zhang R, Zhao H, Zhang J. Distributed Compressed Sensing Aided Sparse Channel Estimation in FDD Massive MIMO System. IEEE Access, 2018, 6: 18383-18397 CrossRef Google Scholar

[52] Kenarsari S R, Naeiny M F. Mobility-Aware Reconstruction Algorithm for Correlated Nonzero Neighborhood Structured Downlink Channel in Massive MIMO. IEEE Access, 2018, 6: 17080-17092 CrossRef Google Scholar

[53] Akbarpour-Kasgari A, Ardebilipour M. Pilot allocation approaches for channel estimation in MIMO relay networks. IET Commun, 2018, 12: 2030-2037 CrossRef Google Scholar

[54] Rao X, Lau V K N. Distributed Compressive CSIT Estimation and Feedback for FDD Multi-User Massive MIMO Systems. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2014, 62: 3261-3271 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[55] Rao X, Lau V K N. Compressive Sensing With Prior Support Quality Information and Application to Massive MIMO Channel Estimation With Temporal Correlation. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2015, 63: 4914-4924 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[56] Sayeed A M. Deconstructing multiantenna fading channels. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2002, 50: 2563-2579 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[57] Tse D, Viswanath P. Fundamentals of Wireless Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. Google Scholar

[58] van Trees H L. Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, Optimum Array Processing. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2004. Google Scholar

[59] David K, Berndt H. 6G Vision and Requirements: Is There Any Need for Beyond 5G?. IEEE Veh Technol Mag, 2018, 13: 72-80 CrossRef Google Scholar

[60] Wang B B, Liu K J R. Advances in Cognitive Radio Networks: A Survey. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process, 2011, 5: 5-23 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[61] Cohen K, Nedic A, Srikant R. Distributed learning algorithms for spectrum sharing in spatial random access networks. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Modeling & Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, & Wireless Networks, 2015. Google Scholar

[62] Elhachimi, Jamal & Guennoun, Zouhair. An artificial intelligence approach for cognitive spectrum management. Int J Comput Tech Appl, 2014, 5: 1219--1225. Google Scholar

[63] Bhattarai S, Park J M, Gao B. An Overview of Dynamic Spectrum Sharing: Ongoing Initiatives, Challenges, and a Roadmap for Future Research. IEEE Trans Cogn Commun Netw, 2016, 2: 110-128 CrossRef Google Scholar

[64] Lu J Y, Li L, Chen G S, et al. Machine learning based intelligent cognitive network using fog computing. In: Proceedings of SPIE 10196, 2017. Google Scholar

[65] Cohen D, Eldar Y C. Sub-Nyquist Sampling for Power Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radios: A Unified Approach. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2014, 62: 3897-3910 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[66] Romero D, Leus G. Wideband Spectrum Sensing From Compressed Measurements Using Spectral Prior Information. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2013, 61: 6232-6246 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[67] LG Electronics. RP-182864 Revised WID on Cross Link Interference (CLI) handling and Remote Interference Management (RIM) for NR (revision of RP-181652). In: 3GPP TSG RAN Meeting #82, Sorrento, 2018. Google Scholar

[68] Bharadia D, McMilin E, Katti S. Full duplex radios. SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev, 2013, 43: 375-386 CrossRef Google Scholar

[69] Duarte M, Dick C, Sabharwal A. Experiment-Driven Characterization of Full-Duplex Wireless Systems. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun, 2012, 11: 4296-4307 CrossRef Google Scholar

[70] Liao Y, Song L Y, Han Z. Full duplex cognitive radio: a new design paradigm for enhancing spectrum usage. IEEE Commun Mag, 2015, 53: 138-145 CrossRef Google Scholar

[71] Liu G, Yu F R, Ji H. In-Band Full-Duplex Relaying: A Survey, Research Issues and Challenges. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials, 2015, 17: 500-524 CrossRef Google Scholar

[72] Riihonen T, Werner S, Wichman R. Hybrid Full-Duplex/Half-Duplex Relaying with Transmit Power Adaptation. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun, 2011, 10: 3074-3085 CrossRef Google Scholar

[73] Ahmed E, Eltawil A M, Sabharwal A. Rate Gain Region and Design Tradeoffs for Full-Duplex Wireless Communications. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun, 2013, 12: 3556-3565 CrossRef Google Scholar

[74] Chai X M, Liu T, Xing C W. Throughput Improvement in Cellular Networks via Full-Duplex Based Device-to-Device Communications. IEEE Access, 2016, 4: 7645-7657 CrossRef Google Scholar

[75] Goyal S, Liu P, Panwar S S. Full duplex cellular systems: will doubling interference prevent doubling capacity?. IEEE Commun Mag, 2015, 53: 121-127 CrossRef Google Scholar

[76] Nguyen D, Tran L N, Pirinen P. On the Spectral Efficiency of Full-Duplex Small Cell Wireless Systems. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun, 2014, 13: 4896-4910 CrossRef Google Scholar

[77] Shao S H, Liu D L, Deng K. Analysis of Carrier Utilization in Full-Duplex Cellular Networks by Dividing the Co-Channel Interference Region. IEEE Commun Lett, 2014, 18: 1043-1046 CrossRef Google Scholar

[78] O'Shea T J, Hoydis J. An introduction to machine learning communications systems. 2017,. arXiv Google Scholar

[79] Zhang J, Jin S, Wen C K, et al. An overview of wireless transmission technology utilizing artificial intelligence. Telecommun Sci, 2018, 34: 46--55. Google Scholar

[80] Lin L J. Reinforcement Learning for Robots Using Neural Networks. Technical Report, Carnegie-Mellon Univ Pittsburgh PA School of Computer Science, 1993. Google Scholar

[81] Huang L C, Zhang H Z, Li R, et al. AI coding: learning to construct error correction codes. 2019,. arXiv Google Scholar

[82] Ye H, Li G Y, Juang B H. Power of Deep Learning for Channel Estimation and Signal Detection in OFDM Systems. IEEE Wireless Commun Lett, 2018, 7: 114-117 CrossRef Google Scholar

[83] O'Shea T J, Erpek T, and Clancy T C. Deep learning based MIMO communications. 2017,. arXiv Google Scholar

[84] Borgerding M, Schniter P, Rangan S. AMP-Inspired Deep Networks for Sparse Linear Inverse Problems. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2017, 65: 4293-4308 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[85] Fujihashi T, Koike-Akino T, Watanabe T, et al. Nonlinear equalization with deep learning for multipurpose visual MIMO communications. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2018. 1--6. Google Scholar

[86] Zhang Q C, Lin M, Yang L T. Energy-Efficient Scheduling for Real-Time Systems Based on Deep Q-Learning Model. IEEE Trans Sustain Comput, 2019, 4: 132-141 CrossRef Google Scholar

[87] Atallah R, Assi C, Khabbaz M. Deep reinforcement learning-based scheduling for roadside communication networks. In: Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks (WiOpt), 2017. 1--8. Google Scholar

[88] Sun H R, Chen X Y, Shi Q J, et al. Learning to optimize: training deep neural networks for wireless resource management. In: Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC), 2017. 1--6. Google Scholar

[89] Xu Z Y, Wang Y Z, Tang J, et al. A deep reinforcement learning based framework for powerefficient resource allocation in cloud RANs. In: Proceedings of 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2017. 1--6. Google Scholar

[90] Kibria M G, Nguyen K, Villardi G P, et al. Big data analytics, machine learning and artificial intelligence in next-generation wireless networks. 2018,. arXiv Google Scholar

[91] Li H W, Wu Q, Xu K, et al. Progress and tendency of space and earth integrated network. Sci Tech Rev, 2016, 34: 95--106. Google Scholar

[92] Zhang N T, Zhao K L, Liu G L. Thought on constructing the integrated space-terrestrial information network. J China Academy Electron Inf Tech, 2015, 10: 223--230. Google Scholar

[93] Fettweis G P. The Tactile Internet: Applications and Challenges. IEEE Veh Technol Mag, 2014, 9: 64-70 CrossRef Google Scholar

[94] ITU-T. The Tactile Internet. ITU-T Technology Watch Report. https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itut/oth/23/01/T23010000230001PDFE.pdf. Google Scholar

[95] Dohler M, Mahmoodi T, Lema M A, et al. Internet of Skills, Where Robotics Meets AI, 5G and the Tactile Internet. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC), 2017. Google Scholar

[96] Fettweis G. The Opportunities of the Tactile Internet-A Challenge for Future Electronics. http://www.lis.ei.tum.de/fileadmin/w00bdv/www/fpl2014/fettweis.pdf. Google Scholar

[97] Simsek M, Aijaz A, Dohler M. 5G-Enabled Tactile Internet. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 2016, 34: 460-473 CrossRef Google Scholar

[98] Dohler M, Mahmoodi T, Lema M, et al. Future of Mobile. EuCNC 2017. Google Scholar

[99] IEEE 5G and Beyond technology roadmap - WHITE PAPER. https://5g.ieee.org/. Google Scholar

[100] ITU-T Technology Watch Report. The Tactile Internet. 2014. Google Scholar

[101] Brynjolfsson E, Mcafee A. The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress,and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. Manhattan: W. W. Norton and Company, 2014. Google Scholar

[102] Singh V K, Kumar M. A Compressed Sensing Approach to Resolve The Energy Hole Problem in Large Scale WSNs. Wireless Pers Commun, 2018, 99: 185-201 CrossRef Google Scholar

[103] Pagan J, Fallahzadeh R, Pedram M. Toward Ultra-Low-Power Remote Health Monitoring: An Optimal and Adaptive Compressed Sensing Framework for Activity Recognition. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput, 2019, 18: 658-673 CrossRef Google Scholar

[104] Zhang J, Xiang Q, Yin Y. Adaptive compressed sensing for wireless image sensor networks. Multimed Tools Appl, 2017, 76: 4227-4242 CrossRef Google Scholar

[105] Senel K, Larsson E G. Grant-Free Massive MTC-Enabled Massive MIMO: A Compressive Sensing Approach. IEEE Trans Commun, 2018, 66: 6164-6175 CrossRef Google Scholar

[106] Feng C, Au W S A, Valalee S, et al. Compressive sensing-based positioning using RSS of WLAN access points. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, 2010. 1--9. Google Scholar

[107] Zhang B, Cheng X, Zhang N, et al. Sparse target counting and localization in sensor networks based on compressed sensing. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, 2011. 2255--2263. Google Scholar

[108] Feng C, Au W S A, Valaee S. Received-Signal-Strength-Based Indoor Positioning Using Compressive Sensing. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput, 2012, 11: 1983-1993 CrossRef Google Scholar

Copyright 2019 Science China Press Co., Ltd. 《中国科学》杂志社有限责任公司 版权所有