logo

Chinese Science Bulletin, Volume 64, Issue 4: 373-383(2019) https://doi.org/10.1360/N972018-01042

Multiple states in turbulence

More info
  • ReceivedOct 23, 2018
  • AcceptedNov 28, 2018
  • PublishedJan 9, 2019

Abstract

Turbulence is ubiquitous in nature, and is known as one of the unresolved problems in classical physics. The classical theory of turbulence assumed that turbulence is ergodic, which means that when turbulence is in a stationary state, even though the instantaneous properties are sensitive to initial conditions, the statistical averages of the instantaneous properties, such as the mean profiles and the skin friction in wall-bounded turbulence, are unique at any fixed set of parameters. This classical ergodic theory is the foundation of turbulence theory and modeling, and makes it possible to extrapolate data from lower Reynolds number turbulence to higher ones. However, in recent years, a few experimental and numerical evidences showed that multiple states exist in several flow problems. That is, the turbulent statistics and flow structures are not the same even at the same control parameters. In this paper, several published flow problems with multiple states are reviewed, including Rayleigh-Bénard convection (RBC), von Kármán flow (VKF), Taylor-Couette flow (TCF), spherical Couette flow (SCF), rotating homogeneous turbulence with Taylor-Green forcing (TGF), and the spanwise rotating plane Couette flows (RPCF). Two different categories of multiple states can be observed from these flow problems. One is in RBC, where several research groups found that the system will have different flow states and it will switch between different states as time evolves. The other can be generally seen from other five flows, where initial conditions or hysteresis effect can be observed. For example, hysteresis loops were reported in the experiments of TCF for global torque and local velocities at very high Reynolds numbers, while in RPCF, different flow statistics and flow structures were obtained with different initial flow fields based on the same code, the same computational domain and the same grid resolution at the same control parameters. Whether the second type of multiple states will finally turn into the first one in a long enough time is an open question which deserves further investigations.

The underlying mechanism of multiple states is not clear at the present moment, which also demands continued effort and studies. In the six flow problems mentioned above, large-scale flow structures persist, which may highlight the importance of the coherent structures and their selectability in turbulence, as concluded by Huisman et al. Another possible guess from myself is the multiple competing flow mechanisms in the flow problems with multiple states. For example, in rotating homogeneous turbulence with Taylor-Green forcing (TGF), there are two competing mechanisms, one is the viscosity dissipation which causes the forward cascade, the other is the system rotation which results in the inverse cascade. The two competing mechanisms will make the system has more equilibrium points and multiple states. I believe that there will be more and more flow problems with multiple states reported in the future, together with a better understanding of the underling mechanism.


Funded by

国家自然科学基金(11822208)

国家自然科学基金(11772297)


Supplement

补充材料

图S1 南宋马远12水图之层波叠浪

图S2 南宋马远12水图之黄河逆流

图S3 南宋马远12水图之云舒浪卷


References

[1] Fu S. Turbulence: Da Vinci's pursuit of science (in Chinese). Mech Eng, 2000, 22: 77–79 [符松. 湍流——达· 芬奇的科学追求. 力学与实践, 2000, 22: 77–79]. Google Scholar

[2] Reynolds O. An experimental investigation of the circumstances which determine whether the motion of water shall be direct or sinuous, and of the law of resistance in parallel channels. Proc Royal Soc London, 1883, 35: 84–99. Google Scholar

[3] Kolmogorov A N. The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds numbers. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR, 1941, 30: 301–305. Google Scholar

[4] Kolmogorov A N. On degenaration of isotropic turbulence in an incompressible viscous liquid. Dokl Akad Nauk URSS, 1941, 30: 538–540. Google Scholar

[5] Kachanov Y S. Physical mechanisms of laminar-boundary-layer transition. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 1994, 26: 411-482 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[6] Lee C B, Wu J Z. Transition in wall-bounded flows. Appl Mech Rev, 2008, 61: 030802 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[7] Andereck C D, Liu S S, Swinney H L. Flow regimes in a circular Couette system with independently rotating cylinders. J Fluid Mech, 1986, 164: 155-183 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[8] Martínez-Arias B, Peixinho J, Crumeyrolle O, et al. Effect of the number of vortices on the torque scaling in Taylor–Couette flow. J Fluid Mech, 2014, 748: 756-767 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[9] Eckhardt B, Schneider T M, Hof B, et al. Turbulence transition in pipe flow. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 2007, 39: 447-468 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[10] Herbert T. Secondary instability of boundary layers. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 1988, 20: 487-526 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[11] Xi H D, Xia K Q. Flow mode transitions in turbulent thermal convection. Phys Fluids, 2008, 20: 055104 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[12] van der Poel E P, Stevens R J A M, Lohse D. Connecting flow structures and heat flux in turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection. Phys Rev E, 2011, 84: 045303 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[13] Ahlers G, Funfschilling D, Bodenschatz E. Heat transport in turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection for Pr ≃ 0.8 and Ra ≲ 1015. J Phys-Conf Ser, 2011, 318: 082001 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[14] Grossmann S, Lohse D. Multiple scaling in the ultimate regime of thermal convection. Phys Fluids, 2011, 23: 045108 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[15] Weiss S, Ahlers G. Effect of tilting on turbulent convection: Cylindrical samples with aspect ratio. J Fluid Mech, 2013, 715: 314-334 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[16] Xie Y C, Ding G Y, Xia K Q. Flow topology transition via global bifurcation in thermally driven turbulence. Phys Rev Lett, 2018, 120: 214501 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[17] Ravelet F, Marié L, Chiffaudel A, et al. Multistability and memory effect in a highly turbulent flow: Experimental evidence for a global bifurcation. Phys Rev Lett, 2004, 93: 164501 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[18] Ravelet F, Chiffaudel A, Daviaud F. Supercritical transition to turbulence in an inertially driven von Kármán closed flow. J Fluid Mech, 2008, 601: 339-364 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[19] Cortet P P, Chiffaudel A, Daviaud F, et al. Experimental evidence of a phase transition in a closed turbulent flow. Phys Rev Lett, 2010, 105: 214501 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[20] Huisman S G, van der Veen R C A, Sun C, et al. Multiple states in highly turbulent Taylor–Couette flow. Nat Commun, 2014, 5: 3820 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[21] van der Veen R C A, Huisman S G, Dung O Y, et al. Exploring the phase space of multiple states in highly turbulent Taylor-Couette flow. Phys Rev Fluids, 2016, 1: 024401 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[22] Grossmann S, Lohse D, Sun C. High–Reynolds Number Taylor-Couette Turbulence. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 2016, 48: 53-80 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[23] Gul M, Elsinga G E, Westerweel J. Experimental investigation of torque hysteresis behaviour of Taylor–Couette Flow. J Fluid Mech, 2018, 836: 635-648 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[24] Zimmerman D S, Triana S A, Lathrop D P. Bi-stability in turbulent, rotating spherical Couette flow. Phys Fluids, 2011, 23: 065104 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[25] Yokoyama N, Takaoka M. Hysteretic transitions between quasi-two-dimensional flow and three-dimensional flow in forced rotating turbulence. Phys Rev Fluids, 2017, 2: 092602 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[26] Xia Z, Shi Y, Cai Q, et al. Multiple states in turbulent plane Couette flow with spanwise rotation. J Fluid Mech, 2018, 837: 477-490 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[27] Huang Y H, Xia Z H, Wan M P, et al. Numerical investigation of plane Couette flow with weak spanwise rotation. Sci China-Phys Mech Astron, 2019, 62: 044711 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[28] Xi H D, Lam S, Xia K Q. From laminar plumes to organized flows: The onset of large-scale circulation in turbulent thermal convection. J Fluid Mech, 2004, 503: 47-56 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[29] Stevens R J A M, Clercx H J H, Lohse D. Breakdown of the large-scale circulation in Γ=1/2 rotating Rayleigh-Bénard flow. Phys Rev E, 2012, 86: 056311 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[30] Gai J, Xia Z, Cai Q, et al. Turbulent statistics and flow structures in spanwise-rotating turbulent plane Couette flows. Phys Rev Fluids, 2016, 1: 054401 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[31] Bech K H, Andersson H I. Secondary flow in weakly rotating turbulent plane Couette flow. J Fluid Mech, 1996, 317: 195-214 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[32] Ping W, Din-Yu H, Shaoqiang T. Pattern selection in a reaction-diffusion equation. Acta Mech Sin, 2002, 18: 652-660 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[33] Hristov G, Ansell P J. Poststall Hysteresis and Flowfield Unsteadiness on a NACA 0012 Airfoil. AIAA J, 2018, 56: 2528-2539 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

Copyright 2020 Science China Press Co., Ltd. 《中国科学》杂志社有限责任公司 版权所有

京ICP备18024590号-1