logo

SCIENTIA SINICA Informationis, Volume 50 , Issue 2 : 184-194(2020) https://doi.org/10.1360/SSI-2019-0101

Safety control system technologies for UAVs: review and prospect

More info
  • ReceivedMay 15, 2019
  • AcceptedJul 23, 2019
  • PublishedFeb 10, 2020

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), considered as platforms for AI technology, play an important role in national security and economic development. With the growing degree of task complexity and the development of anti-UAV technologies, the UAV-incident rate is increasing significantly. Therefore, it is highly desirable to improve UAV safety through anti-disturbance and resilience control. This paper reviews existing studies upon disturbance estimation and fault diagnosis, anti-disturbance control, fault-tolerant control, and task reconfiguration. In addition, technical challenges and potential solutions are presented, including an overall architecture of a UAV safety-control system. In terms of research focus, particular attention must be paid to UAV-characteristics recognition, causality and trace-to-the-source analysis, quantitative analysis of ability, intelligent detection in a local loop, safety control in an overall loop, and task-control-optimization design. In the future, advanced control algorithms must be transferred to the software, chips, and systems of safety control, allowing the proposed control scheme to satisfy major practical needs and applications.


Funded by

国家自然科学基金(61627810,61833013)


References

[1] Fan B K, Zhang R Y. Unmanned aircraft system and artificial intelligence. Geomat Inform Sci Wuhan Univ, 2017, 42: 1523--1529. Google Scholar

[2] Guo L, Fang J C. Recent prospects on some problems of navigation guidance and sensing technology. Sci Sin Inform, 2017, 47: 1198-1208 CrossRef Google Scholar

[3] DoD U S. Summary of the 2018 department of defense artificial intelligence strategy. 2018. https://media.defense.gov/2019/Feb/12/2002088963/-1/-1/1/SUMMARY-OF-DOD-AI-STRATEGY.PDF. Google Scholar

[4] Waslander L S, Wang C. Wind disturbance estimation and rejection for quadrotor position control. In: Proceedings of AIAA SciTech Forum-Infotech@Aerospace, Seattle, 2009. 2009--1983. Google Scholar

[5] Lu H, Liu C, Guo L. Flight Control Design for Small-Scale Helicopter Using Disturbance-Observer-Based Backstepping. J Guidance Control Dyn, 2015, 38: 2235-2240 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[6] Zhang J, Zhou L, Li C. Binary observers based control for quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle with disturbances and measurement delay. Proc Institution Mech Engineers Part G-J Aerospace Eng, 2018, 232: 2807-2820 CrossRef Google Scholar

[7] Lu Q, Ren B, Parameswaran S. Shipboard Landing Control Enabled by an Uncertainty and Disturbance Estimator. J Guidance Control Dyn, 2018, 41: 1502-1520 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[8] Cayero J, Rotondo D, Morcego B. Optimal state observation using quadratic boundedness: Application to UAV disturbance estimation. Int J Appl Math Comput Sci, 2019, 29: 99-109 CrossRef Google Scholar

[9] Meskin N, Khorasani K, Rabbath C A. A Hybrid Fault Detection and Isolation Strategy for a Network of Unmanned Vehicles in Presence of Large Environmental Disturbances. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol, 2010, CrossRef Google Scholar

[10] Hansen S, Blanke M, Adrian J. A framework for diagnosis of critical faults in unmanned aerial vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 19th World Congress the International Federation of Automatic Control, Cape Town, 2014. 10555--10561. Google Scholar

[11] Zhong M, Zhang L, Ding S X. A Probabilistic Approach to Robust Fault Detection for a Class of Nonlinear Systems. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2017, 64: 3930-3939 CrossRef Google Scholar

[12] Guo D, Zhong M, Zhou D. Multisensor Data-Fusion-Based Approach to Airspeed Measurement Fault Detection for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas, 2018, 67: 317-327 CrossRef Google Scholar

[13] Rotondo D, Cristofaro A, Johansen T A, et al. Robust fault and icing diagnosis in unmanned aerial vehicles using LPV interval observers. Int J Robust Nonlin Control, 2018. doi: 10.1002/rnc.4381. Google Scholar

[14] Zhang Q, Wang X, Xiao X. Design of a fault detection and diagnose system for intelligent unmanned aerial vehicle navigation system. Proc Institution Mech Engineers Part C-J Mech Eng Sci, 2019, 233: 2170-2176 CrossRef Google Scholar

[15] Zhao F, Gupta Y P. A simplified predictive control algorithm for disturbance rejection. ISA Trans, 2005, 44: 187-198 CrossRef Google Scholar

[16] Li X, Wang Q G, Li X C, et al. Feedforward control with disturbance prediction for linear discrete-time systems. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol, 2018. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2018.2859911. Google Scholar

[17] Feng C B, Zhang K J. Robust Control of Nonlinear Systems. Beijing: Science Press, 2004. Google Scholar

[18] Guo L, Cheng D Z. Control Theory Introduction: from Basic Concepts to Research Frontier. Beijing: Science Press, 2005. Google Scholar

[19] Zhou K, Doyle J C. Essentials of Robust Control. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1998. Google Scholar

[20] Davison E. The robust control of a servomechanism problem for linear time-invariant multivariable systems. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 1976, 21: 25-34 CrossRef Google Scholar

[21] Huang L. Theory Fundamentals of Stability and Robustness. Beijing: Science Press, 2002. Google Scholar

[22] Han J. From PID to Active Disturbance Rejection Control. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2009, 56: 900-906 CrossRef Google Scholar

[23] Guo L, Chen W H. Disturbance attenuation and rejection for systems with nonlinearity via DOBC approach. Int J Robust NOnlinear Control, 2005, 15: 109-125 CrossRef Google Scholar

[24] Guo L, Wang H. Stochastic Distribution Control System Design: A Convex Optimization Approach. London: Springer, 2009. Google Scholar

[25] Wen X Y, Guo L, Yan P. Composite hierarchical anti-disturbance control for robotic systems with multiple disturbances. Int J Control Autom Syst, 2014, 12: 541-551 CrossRef Google Scholar

[26] Guo L, Cao S Y. Anti-Disturbance Control for Systems with Multiple Disturbances. Florida: CRC Press, 2014. Google Scholar

[27] Guo L, Cao S. Anti-disturbance control theory for systems with multiple disturbances: a survey.. ISA Trans, 2014, 53: 846-849 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[28] MacKunis W, Wilcox Z D, Kaiser M K. Global Adaptive Output Feedback Tracking Control of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol, 2010, 18: 1390-1397 CrossRef Google Scholar

[29] Yuan Y, Cheng L, Wang Z. Position tracking and attitude control for quadrotors via active disturbance rejection control method. Sci China Inf Sci, 2019, 62: 010201 CrossRef Google Scholar

[30] Cabecinhas D, Cunha R, Silvestre C. A Globally Stabilizing Path Following Controller for Rotorcraft With Wind Disturbance Rejection. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol, 2015, 23: 708-714 CrossRef Google Scholar

[31] Islam S, Liu P X, El Saddik A. Robust Control of Four-Rotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle With Disturbance Uncertainty. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2015, 62: 1563-1571 CrossRef Google Scholar

[32] Ma D, Xia Y, Li T. Active disturbance rejection and predictive control strategy for a quadrotor helicopter. IET Control Theor Appl, 2016, 29: 2213-2222 CrossRef Google Scholar

[33] Lyu X, Zhou J, Gu H. Disturbance Observer Based Hovering Control of Quadrotor Tail-Sitter VTOL UAVs Using Synthesis. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2018, 3: 2910-2917 CrossRef Google Scholar

[34] Eslinger C A, Chandler P R. Self-repairing flight control system program overview. In: Proceedings of IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, Dayton, 1988. 504--511. Google Scholar

[35] Zhang Y, Jiang J. Bibliographical review on reconfigurable fault-tolerant control systems. Annu Rev Control, 2008, 32: 229-252 CrossRef Google Scholar

[36] Yu X, Jiang J. A survey of fault-tolerant controllers based on safety-related issues. Annu Rev Control, 2015, 39: 46-57 CrossRef Google Scholar

[37] Waydo S, Hauser J, Bailey R. UAV as a Reliable Wingman: A Flight Demonstration. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol, 2007, 15: 680-688 CrossRef Google Scholar

[38] Garcia G, Keshmiri S. Adaptive and Resilient Flight Control System for a Small Unmanned Aerial System. Int J Aerospace Eng, 2013, 2013(1): 1-25 CrossRef Google Scholar

[39] Marier J S, Rabbath C A, Lechevin N. Health-Aware Coverage Control With Application to a Team of Small UAVs. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol, 2013, 21: 1719-1730 CrossRef Google Scholar

[40] Valasek J, Famularo D, Marwaha M. Fault-Tolerant Adaptive Model Inversion Control for Vision-Based Autonomous Air Refueling. J Guidance Control Dyn, 2017, 40: 1336-1347 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[41] Avram R C, Zhang X, Muse J. Quadrotor Actuator Fault Diagnosis and Accommodation Using Nonlinear Adaptive Estimators. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol, 2017, 25: 2219-2226 CrossRef Google Scholar

[42] Avram R C, Zhang X, Muse J. Nonlinear Adaptive Fault-Tolerant Quadrotor Altitude and Attitude Tracking With Multiple Actuator Faults. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol, 2018, 26: 701-707 CrossRef Google Scholar

[43] Zeghlache S, Mekki H, Bouguerra A. Actuator fault tolerant control using adaptive RBFNN fuzzy sliding mode controller for coaxial octorotor UAV.. ISA Trans, 2018, 80: 267-278 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[44] Guo Y, Jiang B, Zhang Y. A novel robust attitude control for quadrotor aircraft subject to actuator faults and wind gusts. IEEE/CAA J Autom Sin, 2018, 5: 292-300 CrossRef Google Scholar

[45] Wang B, Yu X, Mu L. Disturbance observer-based adaptive fault-tolerant control for a quadrotor helicopter subject to parametric uncertainties and external disturbances. Mech Syst Signal Processing, 2019, 120: 727-743 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[46] Wang B, Zhang Y. An Adaptive Fault-Tolerant Sliding Mode Control Allocation Scheme for Multirotor Helicopter Subject to Simultaneous Actuator Faults. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2018, 65: 4227-4236 CrossRef Google Scholar

[47] Merheb A R, Noura H, Bateman F. Emergency Control of AR Drone Quadrotor UAV Suffering a Total Loss of One Rotor. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, 2017, 22: 961-971 CrossRef Google Scholar

[48] Venkataraman R, Seiler P. Fault-Tolerant Flight Control Using One Aerodynamic Control Surface. J Guidance Control Dyn, 2019, 42: 570-584 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[49] Yu X, Zhang Y. Sense and avoid technologies with applications to unmanned aircraft systems: Review and prospects. Prog Aerospace Sci, 2015, 74: 152-166 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[50] Temizer S, Kochenderfer M J, Kaelbling L P, et al. Collision avoidance for unmanned aircraft using Markov decision processes. In: Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Toronto, 2010. Google Scholar

[51] Aoude G S, Luders B D, Joseph J M. Probabilistically safe motion planning to avoid dynamic obstacles with uncertain motion patterns. Auton Robot, 2013, 35: 51-76 CrossRef Google Scholar

[52] Yu H, Beard R, Byrne J. Vision-based navigation frame mapping and planning for collision avoidance for miniature air vehicles. Control Eng Practice, 2010, 18: 824-836 CrossRef Google Scholar

[53] Chamseddine A, Zhang Y, Rabbath C A. Flatness-Based Trajectory Planning/Replanning for a Quadrotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 2012, 48: 2832-2848 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[54] Karimoddini A, Lin H, Chen B M. Hybrid three-dimensional formation control for unmanned helicopters. Automatica, 2013, 49: 424-433 CrossRef Google Scholar

[55] Zhou X, Yu X, Peng X. UAV Collision Avoidance Based on Varying Cells Strategy. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 2019, 55: 1743-1755 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[56] Zhu Y, Qiao J, Zhang Y. High-Precision Trajectory Tracking Control for Space Manipulator With Neutral Uncertainty and Deadzone Nonlinearity. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol, 2019, 27: 2254-2262 CrossRef Google Scholar

[57] Zhu Y, Qiao J, Guo L. Adaptive Sliding Mode Disturbance Observer-Based Composite Control With Prescribed Performance of Space Manipulators for Target Capturing. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2019, 66: 1973-1983 CrossRef Google Scholar

[58] Zhu Y, Guo L, Qiao J. An enhanced anti-disturbance attitude control law for flexible spacecrafts subject to multiple disturbances. Control Eng Practice, 2019, 84: 274-283 CrossRef Google Scholar

Copyright 2020 Science China Press Co., Ltd. 《中国科学》杂志社有限责任公司 版权所有

京ICP备17057255号       京公网安备11010102003388号