logo

SCIENTIA SINICA Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica, Volume 48, Issue 3: 039507(2018) https://doi.org/10.1360/SSPMA2017-00264

Special gamma-ray bursts and special radiation components from gamma-ray bursts

More info
  • ReceivedSep 20, 2017
  • AcceptedNov 3, 2017
  • PublishedJan 26, 2018
PACS numbers

Abstract

Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) were first detected in 1960s. Since then, GRBs have been observed extensively in gamma-rays. The afterglows of several hundred GRBs were also detected, providing us with abundant clues for understanding the physics of GRBs. However, X-ray observations of GRBs at the prompt burst phase are still quite lacking. These very early X-ray observations should be very important for probing the activities of GRB central engines. The Einstein Probe, a unique satellite that works mainly in soft X-rays (0.5–4 keV) with a large field of view (1.1 sr), will open up a new window for us to observe the prompt X-ray emission of GRBs. In this article, we review the current status of the studies on some special kinds of GRBs such as those rich in X-rays and those baring special emission components. Especially, we investigate possible contributions of EP to the studies of X-ray flashes (XRFs), low-luminosity GRBs, ultra-long GRBs, and the precursors of GRBs. It is found that: (1) EP is expected to detect about 810 GRB-like events, among which 95% are soft XRFs and only 1% are typical GRBs; (2) EP could detect 0.2–8 low-luminosity GRBs each year (the exact detection rate is strongly dependent on the exact spectral distribution of low luminosity GRBs, which is still largely uncertain currently); (3) EP would detect at least 20–200 ultra-long GRBs each year; (4) EP may be able to detect a lot of GRB precursors (at least 80 events per year), which are still poorly understood. We believe that the EP satellite will lead to encouraging discovers and will deepen our understanding of GRBs in various aspects such as their classifications, their progenitors, the triggering mechanisms and the beaming features, etc. We also note that the EP satellite has great advantages on its wide field of view and good sensitivity, over other similar world-wide instruments. We suggested that the project should be carried out as soon as possible.


Funded by

广西相对论天体物理重点实验室基金

国家自然科学基金(编号:)


References

[1] Kumar P, Zhang B. The physics of gamma-ray bursts & relativistic jets. Phys Rep, 2015, 561: 1-109 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[2] Gehrels N, Ramire-Ruiz E, Fox D B. Gamma-ray bursts in the Swift era. Annu Rev Astron Astrophys, 2009, 47: 567-617 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[3] Heise J, Zand J I, Kippen R M, et al. X-ray flashes and X-ray rich gamma ray bursts. In: Bursts in the Afterglow Era: Proceedings of the International Workshop Gamma-Ray. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2001. 16–21. Google Scholar

[4] Heise J. X-ray flashes and X-ray counterparts of gamm-ray bursts. In: The Proceedings of Gamma-Ray Burst and Afterglow Astronomy 2001: A Workshop Celebrating the First Year of the HETE Mission. New York: American Institute of Physics, 2003. 229–236. Google Scholar

[5] Sakamoto T, Lamb D Q, Graziani C, et al. High Energy Transient Explorer 2 observations of the extremely soft X-ray flash XRF 020903. Astrophys J, 2090, 602: 875-885 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[6] Sakamoto T, Hullinger D, Sato G, et al. Global properties of X-ray flashes and X-ray-rich gamma-ray bursts observed by Swift. Astrophys J, 2008, 679: 570-586 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[7] Sakamoto T, Lamb D Q, Kawai N, et al. Global characteristics of X-ray flashes and X-ray-rich gamma-ray bursts observed by HETE-2. Astrophys J, 2005, 629: 311-327 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[8] Sakamoto T, Barthelmy S D, Baumgartner W H, et al. The second Swift burst alert telescope gamma-ray burst catalog. Astrophys J Suppl Ser, 2011, 195: 2-891 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[9] Ghirlanda G, Salvaterra R, Ghisellini G, et al. Accessing the population of high-redshift gamma ray bursts. Mon Not R Astron Soc, 2015, 448: 2514-2524 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[10] Salvaterra R. High redshift gamma-ray bursts. J High Energy Astrophys, 2015, 7: 35-43 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[11] Kaneko Y, Ramirez-Ruiz E, Granot J, et al. Prompt and afterglow emission properties of gamma-ray bursts with spectroscopically identified supernovae. Astrophys J, 2007, 654: 385-402 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[12] Liang E, Zhang B, Virgili F, et al. Low‐luminosity gamma‐ray bursts as a unique population: Luminosity function, local rate, and beaming factor. Astrophys J, 2007, 662: 1111-1118 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[13] Wang X, Li Z, Waxman E, et al. Nonthermal gamma‐ray/X-ray flashes from shock breakout in gamma‐ray burst–associated supernovae. Astrophys J, 2007, 664: 1026-1032 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[14] Nakar E, Sari R. Relativistic shock breakouts—a variety of gamma-ray flares: From low-luminosity gamma-ray bursts to type Ia supernovae. Astrophys J, 2012, 747: 88-102 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[15] Bromberg O, Nakar E, Piran T. Are low-luminosity gamma-ray bursts generated by relativistic jets?. Astrophys J, 2011, 739: L55 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[16] Irwin C M, Chevalier R A. Jet or shock breakout? The low-luminosity GRB 060218. Mon Not R Astron Soc, 2016, 460: 1680-1704 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[17] Campana S, Mangano V, Blustin A J, et al. The association of GRB 060218 with a supernova and the evolution of the shock wave. Nature, 2006, 442: 1008-1010 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[18] Liang E W, Lin T T, Lü J, et al. A tight LisoEp,zΓ0 correlation of gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys J, 2015, 813: 116-124 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[19] Sun H, Zhang B, Li Z. Extragalactic high-energy transients: Event rate densities and luminosity functions. Astrophys J, 2015, 812: 33-50 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[20] Levan A J, Tanvir N R, Starling R L C, et al. A new population of ultra-long duration gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys J, 2014, 781: 13-34 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[21] Gendre B, Stratta G, Atteia J L, et al. The ultra-long gamma-ray burst 111209a: The collapse of a blue supergiant?. Astrophys J, 2013, 766: 30 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[22] Nathanail A, Contopoulos I. Are ultralong gamma-ray bursts powered by black holes spinning down?. Mon Not R Astron Soc-Lett, 2015, 453: L1-L5 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[23] Greiner J, Mazzali P A, Kann D A, et al. A very luminous magnetar-powered supernova associated with an ultra-long γ-ray burst. Nature, 2015, 523: 189-192 CrossRef PubMed ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[24] McBreen S, Hanlon L, McGlynn S, et al. Observations of the intense and ultra-long burst GRB 041219a with the Germanium spectrometer on INTEGRAL. Astron Astrophys, 2006, 455: 433-440 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[25] Koshut T M, Kouveliotou C, Paciesas W S, et al. Gamma-ray burst precursor activity as observed with BATSE. Astrophys J, 1995, 452: 145 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[26] Lazzati D. Precursor activity in bright, long BATSE gamma-ray bursts. Mon Not R Astron Soc, 2005, 357: 722-731 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[27] Hu Y D, Liang E W, Xi S Q, et al. Internal energy dissipation of gamma-ray bursts observed with Swift: Precursors, prompt gamma-rays, extended emission, and late X-ray flares. Astrophys J, 2014, 789: 145-157 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[28] Murakami T, Inoue H, Nishimura J, et al. A γ-ray burst preceded by X-ray activity. Nature, 1991, 350: 592-594 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[29] Murakami T, Ogasaka Y, Yoshida A, et al. GINGA observations of gamma-ray bursts. In: The Proceedings of AIP Conference, Gamma-Ray Bursts, New York, 1991. 28–31. Google Scholar

[30] Sazonov S Y, Sunyaev R A, Terekhov O V, et al. GRANAT/WATCH catalogue of cosmic gamma-ray bursts: December 1989 to September 1994. Astron Astrophys Suppl Ser, 1998, 129: 1-8 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[31] Li L X. Gamma-ray burst precursors as the remnant of the thermal radiation initially trapped in the fireball. Mon Not R Astron Soc, 2007, 380: 621-636 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

  • Figure 1

    (Color online) (a) Comparison of the light curves of GRB 980329 and XRF 971019. It is seen that the XRF hardly shows emission in gamma-ray band [4]; (b) the probability density distribution of the spectral peak energy Epk in XRF 020903, with the highest probability value being 3.7 keV [5].

  • Figure 2

    (Color online) (a) The peak flux density and the spectral peak energy relation for GRBs observed by HETE-2. The numbers of C-GRBs, XRRs and XRFs in the sample are comparable. (b) The spectra of several XRFs, XRRs and C-GRBs, adapted from ref. [7].

  • Figure 3

    (Color online) The detection rate of low-luminosity GRBs as function of the detector sensitivity (in 0.5–4 keV range). (a) Assume the spectral peak energy follows that of GRB 980425, 122 keV, and the spectral indices below and above the spectral peak energy are −1 and −2.3, respectively. The shaded region accounts for the uncertainty in the luminosity function of low-luminosity GRBs. The red dashed line is the EP sensitivity for 100 s integration time. (b) Assume the spectral peak energy follows GRB 060218, 4.7 keV.

  • Figure 4

    (Color online) Different classes of GRBs [20].

  • Figure 5

    (Color online) The X-ray light curves of three ultra-long GRBs 101225A, 111209A, and 121027A. For comparison, a tidal disruption event (blue), two low-luminosity GRBs (orange and black), and normal GRBs (dark region) are also shown [20].

  • Figure 6

    The precursor in GRB 041219a [24] (a) Light curve; (b)-(d) spectrum.

  • Table   Detectors that are related to the observations of XRFs

    探测器/卫星名

    工作时段

    仪器类型

    能段 (keV)

    有效面积(cm2)

    能量分辨率 (keV@keV)

    流量灵敏度(erg cm−2 s−1)

    视场

    WFC/BeppoSAX

    1996–2002

    编码孔

    2–28

    138@10.5 keV

    1.2@6

    WXM/HETE-2

    2000–2006

    编码孔

    2–25

    175×8

    ~1.76@8

    ~8 ×10−9

    1.6 sr

    SXC/HETE-2

    2000–2006

    电荷注入器件

    0.500–14

    6.3@5 keV×2

    0.046@0.526

    0.47 cts cm−2 s−1

    0.91 sr

    XRT/Swift

    2005至今

    电荷耦合器件

    0.2–10

    110@1.5 keV

    ∼0.140@6

    2×10−14@104 s

    GBM/Fermi

    2008至今

    碘化钠晶体

    锗酸铋晶体

    8–1000

    ~200–40000

    18@511 keV×12

    121@511 keV×2

    ~55@511

    ~82@511

    0.74 ph cm2 s−1

    8 sr~4π sr

    LAD/LOFT

    计划2020

    准直型硅漂移探测器

    2–30~80

    1×106@8 keV

    ~0.2–0.26@6

    3×10−8@1 s

    1.5×10−10@50 ks

    π sr

    WXT/EP

    计划2020

    龙虾眼镜头

    0.5–4

    3 @0.1 keV×8

    0.4@1

    ~1×10−11@103 s

    1.1 sr

    FXT/EP

    计划2020

    龙虾眼镜头

    0.5–4

    60@1 keV

    0.1@1

    ~1×10−12@103 s

    1°×1°

Copyright 2019 Science China Press Co., Ltd. 《中国科学》杂志社有限责任公司 版权所有

京ICP备18024590号-1