logo

SCIENTIA SINICA Vitae, Volume 49, Issue 9: 1054-1068(2019) https://doi.org/10.1360/SSV-2019-0160

Role and regulatory mechanism of heterochromatin in pluripotency maintenance

More info
  • ReceivedJul 25, 2019
  • AcceptedAug 9, 2019
  • PublishedSep 4, 2019

Abstract

Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs), including embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells, have the potential to infinitely self-renew and differentiate into all cell types in the body. Therefore, they have important clinical applications in the field of regenerative medicine. Unique heterochromatin and histone modifications play an important role in PSC pluripotency, rapid proliferation, fate determination, and genomic stability. The present article summarizes up-to-date information on the role of and mechanisms underlying the maintenance of pluripotency and genomic stability by heterochromatin. Moreover, it summarizes how PSCs maintain their characteristic heterochromatin states.


Funded by

国家重点研发计划(2018YFA0107002,2018YFC1313003)

国家自然科学基金(31622038,31671497,31430052,31571546)

天津市自然科学基金(18JCJQJC48400)

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金


References

[1] Evans M J, Kaufman M H. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature, 1981, 292: 154-156 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[2] Martin G R. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1981, 78: 7634-7638 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[3] Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell, 2006, 126: 663-676 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[4] Hou P, Li Y, Zhang X, et al. Pluripotent stem cells induced from mouse somatic cells by small-molecule compounds. Science, 2013, 341: 651-654 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[5] Li M, Liu G H, Izpisua Belmonte J C. Navigating the epigenetic landscape of pluripotent stem cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2012, 13: 524-535 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[6] Young R A. Control of the embryonic stem cell state. Cell, 2011, 144: 940-954 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[7] Chen L, Daley G Q. Molecular basis of pluripotency. Human Mol Genets, 2008, 17: R23-R27 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[8] Bernstein B E, Meissner A, Lander E S. The mammalian epigenome. Cell, 2007, 128: 669-681 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[9] Daujat S, Weiss T, Mohn F, et al. H3K64 trimethylation marks heterochromatin and is dynamically remodeled during developmental reprogramming. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 2009, 16: 777-781 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[10] Rose N R, Klose R J. Understanding the relationship between DNA methylation and histone lysine methylation. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA)-Gene Regul Mech, 2014, 1839: 1362-1372 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[11] Musselman C A, Lalonde M E, Côté J, et al. Perceiving the epigenetic landscape through histone readers. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 2012, 19: 1218-1227 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[12] Allshire R C, Madhani H D. Ten principles of heterochromatin formation and function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2018, 19: 229-244 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[13] Nishioka N, Inoue K, Adachi K, et al. The Hippo signaling pathway components Lats and Yap pattern Tead4 activity to distinguish mouse trophectoderm from inner cell mass. Dev Cell, 2009, 16: 398-410 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[14] Shi X, Yin Z, Ling B, et al. Rho differentially regulates the Hippo pathway by modulating the interaction between Amot and Nf2 in the blastocyst. Development, 2017, 144: 3957-3967 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[15] Yuan P, Han J, Guo G, et al. Eset partners with Oct4 to restrict extraembryonic trophoblast lineage potential in embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev, 2009, 23: 2507-2520 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[16] Dodge J E, Kang Y K, Beppu H, et al. Histone H3-K9 methyltransferase ESET is essential for early development. Mol Cellular Biol, 2004, 24: 2478-2486 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[17] Adenot P G, Mercier Y, Renard J P, et al. Differential H4 acetylation of paternal and maternal chromatin precedes DNA replication and differential transcriptional activity in pronuclei of 1-cell mouse embryos. Development, 1997, 124: 4615–4625. Google Scholar

[18] Lepikhov K, Walter J. Differential dynamics of histone H3 methylation at positions K4 and K9 in the mouse zygote. BMC Dev Biol, 2004, 4: 12 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[19] Zhang B, Zheng H, Huang B, et al. Allelic reprogramming of the histone modification H3K4me3 in early mammalian development. Nature, 2016, 537: 553-557 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[20] Liu X, Wang C, Liu W, et al. Distinct features of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 chromatin domains in pre-implantation embryos. Nature, 2016, 537: 558-562 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[21] Kourmouli N, Jeppesen P, Mahadevhaiah S, et al. Heterochromatin and tri-methylated lysine 20 of histone H4 in animals. J Cell Sci, 2004, 117: 2491-2501 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[22] Santos F, Peters A H, Otte A P, et al. Dynamic chromatin modifications characterise the first cell cycle in mouse embryos. Dev Biol, 2005, 280: 225-236 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[23] Erhardt S, Su I H, Schneider R, et al. Consequences of the depletion of zygotic and embryonic enhancer of zeste 2 during preimplantation mouse development. Development, 2003, 130: 4235-4248 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[24] Matoba S, Liu Y, Lu F, et al. Embryonic development following somatic cell nuclear transfer impeded by persisting histone methylation. Cell, 2014, 159: 884-895 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[25] Chung Y G, Matoba S, Liu Y, et al. Histone demethylase expression enhances human somatic cell nuclear transfer efficiency and promotes derivation of pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell, 2015, 17: 758-766 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[26] Wang C, Liu X, Gao Y, et al. Reprogramming of H3K9me3-dependent heterochromatin during mammalian embryo development. Nat Cell Biol, 2018, 20: 620-631 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[27] Mayer W, Niveleau A, Walter J, et al. Demethylation of the zygotic paternal genome. Nature, 2000, 403: 501-502 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[28] Santos F, Hendrich B, Reik W, et al. Dynamic reprogramming of DNA methylation in the early mouse embryo. Dev Biol, 2002, 241: 172-182 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[29] Gu T P, Guo F, Yang H, et al. The role of Tet3 DNA dioxygenase in epigenetic reprogramming by oocytes. Nature, 2011, 477: 606-610 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[30] Guo F, Li X, Liang D, et al. Active and passive demethylation of male and female pronuclear DNA in the Mammalian zygote. Cell Stem Cell, 2014, 15: 447-458 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[31] He Y F, Li B Z, Li Z, et al. Tet-mediated formation of 5-carboxylcytosine and its excision by TDG in mammalian DNA. Science, 2011, 333: 1303-1307 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[32] Ito S, Shen L, Dai Q, et al. Tet proteins can convert 5-methylcytosine to 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine. Science, 2011, 333: 1300-1303 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[33] Nakamura T, Arai Y, Umehara H, et al. PGC7/Stella protects against DNA demethylation in early embryogenesis. Nat Cell Biol, 2007, 9: 64-71 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[34] Carlson L L, Page A W, Bestor T H. Properties and localization of DNA methyltransferase in preimplantation mouse embryos: Implications for genomic imprinting. Genes Dev, 1992, 6: 2536-2541 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[35] Rougier N, Bourc’his D, Gomes D M, et al. Chromosome methylation patterns during mammalian preimplantation development. Genes Dev, 1998, 12: 2108-2113 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[36] Howlett S K, Reik W. Methylation levels of maternal and paternal genomes during preimplantation development. Development, 1991, 113: 119–127. Google Scholar

[37] Guo H, Zhu P, Yan L, et al. The DNA methylation landscape of human early embryos. Nature, 2014, 511: 606-610 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[38] Wu J, Huang B, Chen H, et al. The landscape of accessible chromatin in mammalian preimplantation embryos. Nature, 2016, 534: 652-657 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[39] Du Z, Zheng H, Huang B, et al. Allelic reprogramming of 3D chromatin architecture during early mammalian development. Nature, 2017, 547: 232-235 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[40] Meshorer E, Yellajoshula D, George E, et al. Hyperdynamic plasticity of chromatin proteins in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Dev Cell, 2006, 10: 105-116 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[41] Bernstein B E, Mikkelsen T S, Xie X, et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell, 2006, 125: 315-326 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[42] Zaidan N Z, Walker K J, Brown J E, et al. Compartmentalization of HP1 proteins in pluripotency acquisition and maintenance. Stem Cell Rep, 2018, 10: 627-641 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[43] Pedersen M T, Kooistra S M, Radzisheuskaya A, et al. Continual removal of H3K9 promoter methylation by Jmjd2 demethylases is vital for ESC self-renewal and early development. EMBO J, 2016, 35: 1550-1564 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[44] Wen B, Wu H, Shinkai Y, et al. Large histone H3 lysine 9 dimethylated chromatin blocks distinguish differentiated from embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet, 2009, 41: 246-250 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[45] Martens J H A, O’Sullivan R J, Braunschweig U, et al. The profile of repeat-associated histone lysine methylation states in the mouse epigenome. EMBO J, 2005, 24: 800-812 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[46] Garcia-Perez J L, Widmann T J, Adams I R. The impact of transposable elements on mammalian development. Development, 2016, 143: 4101-4114 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[47] Friedli M, Trono D. The developmental control of transposable elements and the evolution of higher species. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 2015, 31: 429-451 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[48] Glinsky G V. Single cell genomics reveals activation signatures of endogenous SCAR’s networks in aneuploid human embryos and clinically intractable malignant tumors. Cancer Lett, 2016, 381: 176-193 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[49] Friedli M, Turelli P, Kapopoulou A, et al. Loss of transcriptional control over endogenous retroelements during reprogramming to pluripotency. Genome Res, 2014, 24: 1251-1259 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[50] Ohnuki M, Tanabe K, Sutou K, et al. Dynamic regulation of human endogenous retroviruses mediates factor-induced reprogramming and differentiation potential. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2014, 111: 12426-12431 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[51] Becker J S, Nicetto D, Zaret K S. H3K9me3-dependent heterochromatin: Barrier to cell fate changes. Trends Genets, 2016, 32: 29-41 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[52] Soufi A, Donahue G, Zaret K S. Facilitators and impediments of the pluripotency reprogramming factors’ initial engagement with the genome. Cell, 2012, 151: 994-1004 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[53] Onder T T, Kara N, Cherry A, et al. Chromatin-modifying enzymes as modulators of reprogramming. Nature, 2012, 483: 598-602 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[54] Chen J, Liu H, Liu J, et al. H3K9 methylation is a barrier during somatic cell reprogramming into iPSCs. Nat Genet, 2013, 45: 34-42 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[55] Liu L. Linking telomere regulation to stem cell pluripotency. Trends Genets, 2017, 33: 16-33 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[56] Ancelin K, Syx L, Borensztein M, et al. Maternal LSD1/KDM1A is an essential regulator of chromatin and transcription landscapes during zygotic genome activation. eLife, 2016, 5: e08851 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[57] Antony J, Oback F, Chamley L W, et al. Transient JMJD2B-mediated reduction of H3K9me3 levels improves reprogramming of embryonic stem cells into cloned embryos. Mol Cellular Biol, 2013, 33: 974-983 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[58] Niakan K K, Han J, Pedersen R A, et al. Human pre-implantation embryo development. Development, 2012, 139: 829-841 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[59] Vassena R, Boué S, González-Roca E, et al. Waves of early transcriptional activation and pluripotency program initiation during human preimplantation development. Development, 2011, 138: 3699-3709 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[60] Ishiuchi T, Enriquez-Gasca R, Mizutani E, et al. Early embryonic-like cells are induced by downregulating replication-dependent chromatin assembly. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 2015, 22: 662-671 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[61] Cheloufi S, Elling U, Hopfgartner B, et al. The histone chaperone CAF-1 safeguards somatic cell identity. Nature, 2015, 528: 218-224 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[62] Shi Y, Desponts C, Do J T, et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic fibroblasts by Oct4 and Klf4 with small-molecule compounds. Cell Stem Cell, 2008, 3: 568-574 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[63] Huangfu D, Osafune K, Maehr R, et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from primary human fibroblasts with only Oct4 and Sox2. Nat Biotechnol, 2008, 26: 1269-1275 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[64] Mali P, Chou B K, Yen J, et al. Butyrate greatly enhances derivation of human induced pluripotent stem cells by promoting epigenetic remodeling and the expression of pluripotency-associated genes. STEM CellS, 2010, 28: 713-720 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[65] Iager A E, Ragina N P, Ross P J, et al. Trichostatin A improves histone acetylation in bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer early embryos. Cloning Stem Cells, 2008, 10: 371-380 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[66] Wakayama S, Kohda T, Obokata H, et al. Successful serial recloning in the mouse over multiple generations. Cell Stem Cell, 2013, 12: 293-297 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[67] Kong Q, Ji G, Xie B, et al. Telomere elongation facilitated by trichostatin a in cloned embryos and pigs by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Stem Cell Rev Rep, 2014, 10: 399-407 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[68] Kishigami S, Mizutani E, Ohta H, et al. Significant improvement of mouse cloning technique by treatment with trichostatin A after somatic nuclear transfer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2006, 340: 183-189 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[69] Mizutani E, Oikawa M, Kassai H, et al. Generation of cloned mice from adult neurons by direct nuclear transfer1. Biol Reprod, 2015, 92: 81 CrossRef Google Scholar

[70] Liu Z, Cai Y, Wang Y, et al. Cloning of macaque monkeys by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Cell, 2018, 172: 881-887 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[71] Matsui T, Leung D, Miyashita H, et al. Proviral silencing in embryonic stem cells requires the histone methyltransferase ESET. Nature, 2010, 464: 927-931 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[72] Karimi M M, Goyal P, Maksakova I A, et al. DNA methylation and SETDB1/H3K9me3 regulate predominantly distinct sets of genes, retroelements, and chimeric transcripts in mESCs. Cell Stem Cell, 2011, 8: 676-687 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[73] Bulut-Karslioglu A, De La Rosa-Velázquez I A, Ramirez F, et al. Suv39h-dependent H3K9me3 marks intact retrotransposons and silences LINE elements in mouse embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell, 2014, 55: 277-290 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[74] Rowe H M, Jakobsson J, Mesnard D, et al. KAP1 controls endogenous retroviruses in embryonic stem cells. Nature, 2010, 463: 237-240 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[75] Robbez-Masson L, Rowe H M. Retrotransposons shape species-specific embryonic stem cell gene expression. Retrovirology, 2015, 12: 45 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[76] Imbeault M, Helleboid P Y, Trono D. KRAB zinc-finger proteins contribute to the evolution of gene regulatory networks. Nature, 2017, 543: 550-554 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[77] Liu N, Lee C H, Swigut T, et al. Selective silencing of euchromatic L1s revealed by genome-wide screens for L1 regulators. Nature, 2018, 553: 228-232 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[78] Macfarlan T S, Gifford W D, Agarwal S, et al. Endogenous retroviruses and neighboring genes are coordinately repressed by LSD1/KDM1A. Genes Dev, 2011, 25: 594-607 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[79] Lu F, Liu Y, Jiang L, et al. Role of Tet proteins in enhancer activity and telomere elongation. Genes Dev, 2014, 28: 2103-2119 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[80] Dan J, Liu Y, Liu N, et al. Rif1 maintains telomere length homeostasis of ESCs by mediating heterochromatin silencing. Dev Cell, 2014, 29: 7-19 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[81] Li P, Wang L, Bennett B D, et al. Rif1 promotes a repressive chromatin state to safeguard against endogenous retrovirus activation. Nucleic Acids Res, 2017, 45: 12723-12738 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[82] Macfarlan T S, Gifford W D, Driscoll S, et al. Embryonic stem cell potency fluctuates with endogenous retrovirus activity. Nature, 2012, 487: 57-63 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[83] Kelley D, Rinn J. Transposable elements reveal a stem cell-specific class of long noncoding RNAs. Genome Biol, 2012, 13: R107 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[84] Baker C L, Pera M F. Capturing totipotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell, 2018, 22: 25-34 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[85] Lu F, Liu Y, Inoue A, et al. Establishing chromatin regulatory landscape during mouse preimplantation development. Cell, 2016, 165: 1375-1388 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[86] Jachowicz J W, Bing X, Pontabry J, et al. LINE-1 activation after fertilization regulates global chromatin accessibility in the early mouse embryo. Nat Genet, 2017, 49: 1502-1510 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[87] Zalzman M, Falco G, Sharova L V, et al. Zscan4 regulates telomere elongation and genomic stability in ES cells. Nature, 2010, 464: 858-863 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[88] Lu X, Sachs F, Ramsay L A, et al. The retrovirus HERVH is a long noncoding RNA required for human embryonic stem cell identity. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 2014, 21: 423-425 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[89] Wang J, Xie G, Singh M, et al. Primate-specific endogenous retrovirus-driven transcription defines naive-like stem cells. Nature, 2014, 516: 405-409 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[90] Göke J, Lu X, Chan Y S, et al. Dynamic transcription of distinct classes of endogenous retroviral elements marks specific populations of early human embryonic cells. Cell Stem Cell, 2015, 16: 135-141 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[91] Kidder B L, Hu G, Cui K, et al. Smyd5 regulates H4K20me3-marked heterochromatin to safeguard ES cell self-renewal and prevent spurious differentiation. Epigenets Chromatin, 2017, 10: 8 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[92] He Q, Kim H, Huang R, et al. The Daxx/Atrx complex protects tandem repetitive elements during DNA hypomethylation by promoting H3K9 trimethylation. Cell Stem Cell, 2015, 17: 273-286 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[93] Li Z, Zhao D, Xiang B, et al. Structural and biochemical characterization of DAXX-ATRX interaction. Protein Cell, 2017, 8: 762-766 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[94] Hoelper D, Huang H, Jain A Y, et al. Structural and mechanistic insights into ATRX-dependent and -independent functions of the histone chaperone DAXX. Nat Commun, 2017, 8: 1193 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[95] Wang F, Yin Y, Ye X, et al. Molecular insights into the heterogeneity of telomere reprogramming in induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Res, 2012, 22: 757-768 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[96] Wong L H, Ren H, Williams E, et al. Histone H3.3 incorporation provides a unique and functionally essential telomeric chromatin in embryonic stem cells. Genome Res, 2009, 19: 404-414 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[97] Marion R M, Strati K, Li H, et al. Telomeres acquire embryonic stem cell characteristics in induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell, 2009, 4: 141-154 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[98] Gonzalo S, Jaco I, Fraga M F, et al. DNA methyltransferases control telomere length and telomere recombination in mammalian cells. Nat Cell Biol, 2006, 8: 416-424 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[99] García-Cao M, O’Sullivan R, Peters A H F M, et al. Epigenetic regulation of telomere length in mammalian cells by the Suv39h1 and Suv39h2 histone methyltransferases. Nat Genet, 2004, 36: 94-99 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[100] Benetti R, Gonzalo S, Jaco I, et al. Suv4-20h deficiency results in telomere elongation and derepression of telomere recombination. J Cell Biol, 2007, 178: 925-936 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[101] Dan J, Yang J, Liu Y, et al. Roles for Histone acetylation in regulation of telomere elongation and two-cell state in mouse ES cells. J Cell Physiol, 2015, 230: 2337-2344 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[102] Goldberg A D, Banaszynski L A, Noh K M, et al. Distinct factors control histone variant H3.3 localization at specific genomic regions. Cell, 2010, 140: 678-691 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[103] Elsässer S J, Noh K M, Diaz N, et al. Histone H3.3 is required for endogenous retroviral element silencing in embryonic stem cells. Nature, 2015, 522: 240-244 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[104] Lewis P W, Elsaesser S J, Noh K M, et al. Daxx is an H3.3-specific histone chaperone and cooperates with ATRX in replication-independent chromatin assembly at telomeres. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2010, 107: 14075-14080 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[105] Udugama M, M Chang F T, Chan F L, et al. Histone variant H3.3 provides the heterochromatic H3 lysine 9 tri-methylation mark at telomeres. Nucleic Acids Res, 2015, 43: 10227-10237 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[106] Ivanauskiene K, Delbarre E, McGhie J D, et al. The PML-associated protein DEK regulates the balance of H3.3 loading on chromatin and is important for telomere integrity. Genome Res, 2014, 24: 1584-1594 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[107] Clynes D, Higgs D R, Gibbons R J. The chromatin remodeller ATRX: A repeat offender in human disease. Trends Biochem Sci, 2013, 38: 461-466 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[108] Clynes D, Jelinska C, Xella B, et al. Suppression of the alternative lengthening of telomere pathway by the chromatin remodelling factor ATRX. Nat Commun, 2015, 6: 7538 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[109] Napier C E, Huschtscha L I, Harvey A, et al. ATRX represses alternative lengthening of telomeres. Oncotarget, 2015, 6: 16543-16558 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[110] Chang F T M, McGhie J D, Chan F L, et al. PML bodies provide an important platform for the maintenance of telomeric chromatin integrity in embryonic stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res, 2013, 41: 4447-4458 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[111] De Iaco A, Planet E, Coluccio A, et al. DUX-family transcription factors regulate zygotic genome activation in placental mammals. Nat Genet, 2017, 49: 941-945 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[112] Hendrickson P G, Doráis J A, Grow E J, et al. Conserved roles of mouse DUX and human DUX4 in activating cleavage-stage genes and MERVL/HERVL retrotransposons. Nat Genet, 2017, 49: 925-934 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[113] Whiddon J L, Langford A T, Wong C J, et al. Conservation and innovation in the DUX4-family gene network. Nat Genet, 2017, 49: 935-940 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[114] Armanios M, Alder J K, Parry E M, et al. Short telomeres are sufficient to cause the degenerative defects associated with aging. Am J Human Genets, 2009, 85: 823-832 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[115] Li H, Collado M, Villasante A, et al. The Ink4/Arf locus is a barrier for iPS cell reprogramming. Nature, 2009, 460: 1136-1139 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[116] Rohani L, Johnson A A, Arnold A, et al. The aging signature: A hallmark of induced pluripotent stem cells?. Aging Cell, 2014, 13: 2-7 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[117] Lapasset L, Milhavet O, Prieur A, et al. Rejuvenating senescent and centenarian human cells by reprogramming through the pluripotent state. Genes Dev, 2011, 25: 2248-2253 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[118] Yagi T, Kosakai A, Ito D, et al. Establishment of induced pluripotent stem cells from centenarians for neurodegenerative disease research. PLoS ONE, 2012, 7: e41572 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[119] Liu G H, Barkho B Z, Ruiz S, et al. Recapitulation of premature ageing with iPSCs from Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Nature, 2011, 472: 221-225 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[120] Cheung H H, Liu X, Canterel-Thouennon L, et al. Telomerase protects werner syndrome lineage-specific stem cells from premature aging. Stem Cell Rep, 2014, 2: 534-546 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[121] Wahlestedt M, Norddahl G L, Sten G, et al. An epigenetic component of hematopoietic stem cell aging amenable to reprogramming into a young state. Blood, 2013, 121: 4257-4264 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[122] Varela E, Muñoz-Lorente M A, Tejera A M, et al. Generation of mice with longer and better preserved telomeres in the absence of genetic manipulations. Nat Commun, 2016, 7: 11739 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[123] Agarwal S, Loh Y H, McLoughlin E M, et al. Telomere elongation in induced pluripotent stem cells from dyskeratosis congenita patients. Nature, 2010, 464: 292-296 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[124] Batista L F Z, Pech M F, Zhong F L, et al. Telomere shortening and loss of self-renewal in dyskeratosis congenita induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature, 2011, 474: 399-402 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[125] Winkler T, Hong S G, Decker J E, et al. Defective telomere elongation and hematopoiesis from telomerase-mutant aplastic anemia iPSCs. J Clin Invest, 2013, 123: 1952-1963 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[126] Gurdon J, Murdoch A. Nuclear transfer and iPS may work best together. Cell Stem Cell, 2008, 2: 135-138 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[127] Le R, Kou Z, Jiang Y, et al. Enhanced telomere rejuvenation in pluripotent cells reprogrammed via nuclear transfer relative to induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell, 2014, 14: 27-39 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[128] Sung L Y, Chang W F, Zhang Q, et al. Telomere elongation and naive pluripotent stem cells achieved from telomerase haplo-insufficient cells by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Cell Rep, 2014, 9: 1603-1609 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[129] Hirata T, Amano T, Nakatake Y, et al. Zscan4 transiently reactivates early embryonic genes during the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Sci Rep, 2012, 2: 208 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[130] Jiang J, Lv W, Ye X, et al. Zscan4 promotes genomic stability during reprogramming and dramatically improves the quality of iPS cells as demonstrated by tetraploid complementation. Cell Res, 2013, 23: 92-106 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[131] De Bonis M L, Ortega S, Blasco M A. SIRT1 is necessary for proficient telomere elongation and genomic stability of induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Rep, 2014, 2: 690-706 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[132] Lee Y L, Peng Q, Fong S W, et al. Sirtuin 1 facilitates generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic fibroblasts through the miR-34a and p53 pathways. PLoS ONE, 2012, 7: e45633 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[133] Michishita E, McCord R A, Berber E, et al. SIRT6 is a histone H3 lysine 9 deacetylase that modulates telomeric chromatin. Nature, 2008, 452: 492-496 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[134] Tennen R I, Bua D J, Wright W E, et al. SIRT6 is required for maintenance of telomere position effect in human cells. Nat Commun, 2011, 2: 433 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[135] Sharma A, Diecke S, Zhang W Y, et al. The role of SIRT6 protein in aging and reprogramming of human induced pluripotent stem cells. J Biol Chem, 2013, 288: 18439-18447 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[136] Guo R, Ye X, Yang J, et al. Feeders facilitate telomere maintenance and chromosomal stability of embryonic stem cells. Nat Commun, 2018, 9: 2620 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[137] Huynh K D, Lee J T. X-chromosome inactivation: a hypothesis linking ontogeny and phylogeny. Nat Rev Genet, 2005, 6: 410-418 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[138] Heard E. Recent advances in X-chromosome inactivation. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 2004, 16: 247-255 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[139] Hayashi K, de Sousa Lopes S M C, Surani M A. Germ cell specification in mice. Science, 2007, 316: 394-396 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[140] Maherali N, Sridharan R, Xie W, et al. Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Cell Stem Cell, 2007, 1: 55-70 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[141] Eggan K, Akutsu H, Hochedlinger K, et al. X-chromosome inactivation in cloned mouse embryos. Science, 2000, 290: 1578-1581 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[142] Tada M, Takahama Y, Abe K, et al. Nuclear reprogramming of somatic cells by in vitro hybridization with ES cells. Curr Biol, 2001, 11: 1553-1558 CrossRef Google Scholar

[143] Kim D H, Jeon Y, Anguera M C, et al. X-chromosome epigenetic reprogramming in pluripotent stem cells via noncoding genes. Seminars Cell Dev Biol, 2011, 22: 336-342 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[144] Minkovsky A, Patel S, Plath K. Concise review: Pluripotency and the transcriptional inactivation of the female Mammalian X chromosome. STEM CellS, 2012, 30: 48-54 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[145] Penny G D, Kay G F, Sheardown S A, et al. Requirement for Xist in X chromosome inactivation. Nature, 1996, 379: 131-137 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[146] Engreitz J M, Pandya-Jones A, McDonel P, et al. The Xist lncRNA exploits three-dimensional genome architecture to spread across the X chromosome. Science, 2013, 341: 1237973 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[147] Payer B, Lee J T. X chromosome dosage compensation: How mammals keep the balance. Annu Rev Genet, 2008, 42: 733-772 CrossRef Google Scholar

[148] Chu C, Zhang Q C, da Rocha S T, et al. Systematic discovery of Xist RNA binding proteins. Cell, 2015, 161: 404-416 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[149] McHugh C A, Chen C K, Chow A, et al. The Xist lncRNA interacts directly with SHARP to silence transcription through HDAC3. Nature, 2015, 521: 232-236 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[150] Minajigi A, Froberg J E, Wei C, et al. A comprehensive Xist interactome reveals cohesin repulsion and an RNA-directed chromosome conformation. Science, 2015, 349: aab2276 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[151] Lee J T, Davidow L S, Warshawsky D. Tsix, a gene antisense to Xist at the X-inactivation centre. Nat Genet, 1999, 21: 400-404 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[152] Lee J T, Lu N. Targeted mutagenesis of Tsix leads to nonrandom X inactivation. Cell, 1999, 99: 47-57 CrossRef Google Scholar

[153] Ogawa Y, Lee J T. Xite, X-inactivation intergenic transcription elements that regulate the probability of choice. Mol Cell, 2003, 11: 731-743 CrossRef Google Scholar

[154] Tian D, Sun S, Lee J T. The long noncoding RNA, Jpx, is a molecular switch for X chromosome inactivation. Cell, 2010, 143: 390-403 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[155] Chao W, Huynh K D, Spencer R J, et al. CTCF, a candidate trans-acting factor for X-inactivation choice. Science, 2002, 295: 345-347 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[156] Donohoe M E, Zhang L F, Xu N, et al. Identification of a Ctcf cofactor, Yy1, for the X chromosome binary switch. Mol Cell, 2007, 25: 43-56 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[157] Wutz A. Gene silencing in X-chromosome inactivation: Advances in understanding facultative heterochromatin formation. Nat Rev Genet, 2011, 12: 542-553 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[158] Lu Z, Carter A C, Chang H Y. Mechanistic insights in X-chromosome inactivation. Phil Trans R Soc B, 2017, 372: 20160356 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[159] da Rocha S T, Heard E. Novel players in X inactivation: Insights into Xist-mediated gene silencing and chromosome conformation. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 2017, 24: 197-204 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[160] Jégu T, Aeby E, Lee J T. The X chromosome in space. Nat Rev Genet, 2017, 18: 377-389 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[161] Sahakyan A, Yang Y, Plath K. The role of Xist in X-chromosome dosage compensation. Trends Cell Biol, 2018, 28: 999-1013 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[162] Silva J, Nichols J, Theunissen T W, et al. Nanog is the gateway to the pluripotent ground state. Cell, 2009, 138: 722-737 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[163] Chen X, Xu H, Yuan P, et al. Integration of external signaling pathways with the core transcriptional network in embryonic stem cells. Cell, 2008, 133: 1106-1117 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[164] Navarro P, Chambers I, Karwacki-Neisius V, et al. Molecular coupling of Xist regulation and pluripotency. Science, 2008, 321: 1693-1695 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[165] Donohoe M E, Silva S S, Pinter S F, et al. The pluripotency factor Oct4 interacts with Ctcf and also controls X-chromosome pairing and counting. Nature, 2009, 460: 128-132 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[166] Pasque V, Tchieu J, Karnik R, et al. X chromosome reactivation dynamics reveal stages of reprogramming to pluripotency. Cell, 2014, 159: 1681-1697 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[167] Ha N, Lai L T, Chelliah R, et al. Live-cell imaging and functional dissection of Xist RNA reveal mechanisms of X chromosome inactivation and reactivation. iScience, 2018, 8: 1-14 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[168] Mattout A, Meshorer E. Chromatin plasticity and genome organization in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 2010, 22: 334-341 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

  • Figure 1

    A simplified schematic representation of the effects of ESC heterochromatin composition; modifications, including repeats, telomere/telomeric regions, and centromere regions on the activity of retrotransposons. Heterochromatin plays a fine regulatory role in ESC pluripotent gene expression and networks, MEF, mouse embryonic fibroblasts

  • Figure 2

    Telomere and heterochromatin histone modifications play important roles in stem cell pluripotency maintenance and differentiation. The H3K9me3 epigenetic protein complex regulates telomere homeostasis and PSC pluripotency, preventing excessive cells from entering the 2C state and maintaining only 1%–5% of cells transiently expressing Zscan4/ERV (these cells do not express Oct4, Nanog protein) and 95%–99% of normally expressing pluripotent transcription factors (such as Oct4 and Nanog) [55]

Copyright 2020 Science China Press Co., Ltd. 《中国科学》杂志社有限责任公司 版权所有

京ICP备18024590号-1