logo

SCIENTIA SINICA Vitae, Volume 49, Issue 9: 1125-1132(2019) https://doi.org/10.1360/SSV-2019-0162

Mechanism of NRP-mediated plant stress responses

More info
  • ReceivedJul 24, 2019
  • AcceptedAug 7, 2019
  • PublishedSep 9, 2019

Abstract

As sessile organisms, plants have evolved the complex mechanisms of adapting to changing environments. Appropriate responses in accordance with various stresses facilitate the survival of plants. Following advances in the study of stress responses, numerous signaling pathways have been revealed. Recently, our laboratory, accompanied by other laboratories, has identified a novel molecule, N-rich protein (NRP) that is highly conserved in plants and has a crucial role in controlling plant responses to various stresses. Studying NRP provides a molecular basis for the control of plant stress responses and could facilitate improvements in crop yields. In the present study, we summarized the discovery and analysis of NRP protein sequences as well as the signal transduction pathways of NRP involved in plant stress response and the specific molecular mechanisms underlying NRP functions.


References

[1] Hoepflinger M C, Pieslinger A M, Tenhaken R. Investigations on N-rich protein (NRP) of Arabidopsis thaliana under different stress conditions. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2011, 49: 293-302 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[2] Zhou R, Zhu T, Han L, et al. The asparagine-rich protein NRP interacts with the Verticillium effector PevD1 and regulates the subcellular localization of cryptochrome 2. J Exp Bot, 2017, 68: 3427-3440 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[3] Hui Z. Role of salicylic acid in plant stress physiology (in Chinese). Value Eng, 2013, 32: 313–314 [张会. 水杨酸在植物逆境生理中的作用. 价值工程, 2013, 32: 313–314]. Google Scholar

[4] Reis P A B, Carpinetti P A, Freitas P P J, et al. Functional and regulatory conservation of the soybean ER stress-induced DCD/NRP-mediated cell death signaling in plants. BMC Plant Biol, 2016, 16: 156 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[5] Tenhaken R, Doerks T, Bork P. DCD—a novel plant specific domain in proteins involved in development and programmed cell death. BMC Bioinf, 2005, 6: 169 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[6] Ludwig A A, Tenhaken R. A new cell wall located N-rich protein is strongly induced during the hypersensitive response in Glycine max L. Eur J Plant Pathol, 2001, 107: 323-336 CrossRef Google Scholar

[7] Bairoch A, Bucher P, Hofmann K. The PROSITE database, its status in 1997. Nucleic Acids Res, 1997, 25: 217-221 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[8] Altschul S F, Gish W, Miller W, et al. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol, 1990, 215: 403-410 CrossRef Google Scholar

[9] Costa M D L, Reis P A B, Valente M A S, et al. A new branch of endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling and the osmotic signal converge on plant-specific asparagine-rich proteins to promote cell death. J Biol Chem, 2008, 283: 20209-20219 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[10] Ding L, Pandey S, Assmann S M. Arabidopsis extra-large G proteins (XLGs) regulate root morphogenesis. Plant J, 2008, 53: 248-263 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[11] Liang Y, Gao Y, Jones A M. Extra large G-protein interactome reveals multiple stress response function and partner-dependent XLG subcellular localization. Front Plant Sci, 2017, 8: 1015 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[12] Zhu T, Wu Y, Yang X, et al. The asparagine-rich protein NRP facilitates the degradation of the PP6-type phosphatase FyPP3 to promote ABA response in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant, 2018, 11: 257-268 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[13] Walter P, Ron D. The unfolded protein response: From stress pathway to homeostatic regulation. Science, 2011, 334: 1081-1086 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[14] Reis P A B, Fontes E P B. N-rich protein (NRP)-mediated cell death signaling. Plant Signal Behav, 2012, 7: 628-632 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[15] Faria J A Q A, Reis P A B, Reis M T B, et al. The NAC domain-containing protein, GmNAC6, is a downstream component of the ER stress- and osmotic stress-induced NRP-mediated cell-death signaling pathway. BMC Plant Biol, 2011, 11: 129 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[16] Alvarez M E. Salicylic acid in the machinery of hypersensitive cell death and disease resistance. Plant Mol Biol, 2000, 44: 429-442 CrossRef Google Scholar

[17] Delaney T P, Uknes S, Vernooij B, et al. A central role of salicylic acid in plant disease resistance. Science, 1994, 266: 1247-1250 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[18] Ludwig A, Tenhaken R. Defence gene expression in soybean is linked to the status of the cell death program. Plant Mol Biol, 2000, 44: 209-218 CrossRef Google Scholar

[19] Shirasu K, Nakajima H, Rajasekhar V K, et al. Salicylic acid potentiates an agonist-dependent gain control that amplifies pathogen signals in the activation of defense mechanisms. Plant Cell, 1997, 9: 261-270 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[20] Maleck K, Levine A, Eulgem T, et al. The transcriptome of Arabidopsis thaliana during systemic acquired resistance. Nat Genet, 2000, 26: 403-410 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[21] Tenhaken R, Anstätt C, Ludwig A, et al. WY-14,643 and other agonists of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor reveal a new mode of action for salicylic acid in soybean disease resistance. Planta, 2001, 212: 888-895 CrossRef Google Scholar

[22] Wojtaszek P. Oxidative burst: An early plant response to pathogen infection. Biochem J, 1997, 322: 681-692 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[23] Williams G T, Smith C A. Molecular regulation of apoptosis: Genetic controls on cell death. Cell, 1993, 74: 777-779 CrossRef Google Scholar

[24] Wang H, Li J, Bostock R M, et al. Apoptosis: A functional paradigm for programmed plant cell death induced by a host-selective phytotoxin and invoked during development. Plant Cell, 1996, 8: 375-391 CrossRef Google Scholar

[25] Levine A, Pennell R I, Alvarez M E, et al. Calcium-mediated apoptosis in a plant hypersensitive disease resistance response. Curr Biol, 1996, 6: 427-437 CrossRef Google Scholar

[26] Brisson L F, Tenhaken R, Lamb C. Function of oxidative cross-linking of cell wall structural proteins in plant disease resistance. Plant Cell, 1994, 6: 1703-1712 CrossRef Google Scholar

[27] Otte O, Barz W. The elicitor-induced oxidative burst in cultured chickpea cells drives the rapid insolubilization of two cell wall structural proteins. Planta, 1996, 200: 238-246 CrossRef Google Scholar

[28] Hirayama T, Shinozaki K. Research on plant abiotic stress responses in the post-genome era: Past, present and future. Plant J, 2010, 61: 1041-1052 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[29] Kissoudis C, van de Wiel C, Visser R G F, et al. Enhancing crop resilience to combined abiotic and biotic stress through the dissection of physiological and molecular crosstalk. Front Plant Sci, 2014, 5: 207 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[30] Spoel S H, Dong X. Making sense of hormone crosstalk during plant immune responses. Cell Host Microbe, 2008, 3: 348-351 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[31] Kachroo A, Robin G P. Systemic signaling during plant defense. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2013, 16: 527-533 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[32] Wei W, Davis R E, Nuss D L, et al. Phytoplasmal infection derails genetically preprogrammed meristem fate and alters plant architecture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2013, 110: 19149-19154 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[33] Genoud T, Buchala A J, Chua N H, et al. Phytochrome signalling modulates the SA-perceptive pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant J, 2002, 31: 87-95 CrossRef Google Scholar

[34] Roden L C, Ingle R A. Lights, rhythms, infection: The role of light and the circadian clock in determining the outcome of plant-pathogen interactions. Plant Cell, 2009, 21: 2546-2552 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[35] Jeong R D, Chandra-Shekara A C, Barman S R, et al. Cryptochrome 2 and phototropin 2 regulate resistance protein-mediated viral defense by negatively regulating an E3 ubiquitin ligase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2010, 107: 13538-13543 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[36] Guo H, Yang H, Mockler T C, et al. Regulation of flowering time by Arabidopsis photoreceptors. Science, 1998, 279: 1360-1363 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[37] Yoo S K, Chung K S, Kim J, et al. Constans activates suppressor of overexpression of constans 1 through Flowering Locus T to promote flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol, 2005, 139: 770-778 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[38] Liu B, Yang Z, Gomez A, et al. Signaling mechanisms of plant cryptochromes in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Plant Res, 2016, 129: 137-148 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[39] Liu H, Yu X, Li K, et al. Photoexcited CRY2 interacts with CIB1 to regulate transcription and floral initiation in Arabidopsis. Science, 2008, 322: 1535-1539 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[40] Liu Y, Li X, Li K, et al. Multiple bHLH proteins form heterodimers to mediate CRY2-dependent regulation of flowering-time in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet, 2013, 9: e1003861 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[41] Miao W, Wang X, Li M, et al. Genetic transformation of cotton with a harpin-encoding gene hpaXoo confers an enhanced defense response against different pathogens through a priming mechanism. BMC Plant Biol, 2010, 10: 67 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[42] Li H Y, Guo Z F, Zhu Y X. Molecular cloning and analysis of a pea cDNA that is expressed in darkness and very rapidly induced by gibberellic acid. Mol Gen Genet MGG, 1998, 259: 393-397 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[43] Finkelstein R. Abscisic acid synthesis and response. Book, 2013, 11: e0166 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[44] Yin H, Zhang X, Liu J, et al. Epigenetic regulation, somatic homologous recombination, and abscisic acid signaling are influenced by DNA Polymerase ϵ mutation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 2009, 21: 386-402 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[45] Wang P, Zhao Y, Li Z, et al. Reciprocal regulation of the TOR kinase and ABA receptor balances plant growth and stress response. Mol Cell, 2018, 69: 100-112.e6 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[46] Nakashima K, Fujita Y, Kanamori N, et al. Three Arabidopsis SnRK2 protein kinases, SRK2D/SnRK2.2, SRK2E/SnRK2.6/OST1 and SRK2I/SnRK2.3, involved in ABA signaling are essential for the control of seed development and dormancy. Plant Cell Physiol, 2009, 50: 1345-1363 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[47] Dai M, Zhang C, Kania U, et al. A PP6-Type phosphatase holoenzyme directly regulates PIN phosphorylation and auxin efflux in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 2012, 24: 2497-2514 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[48] Dai M, Xue Q, Mccray T, et al. The PP6 phosphatase regulates ABI5 phosphorylation and abscisic acid signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 2013, 25: 517-534 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright 2020 Science China Press Co., Ltd. 《中国科学》杂志社有限责任公司 版权所有

京ICP备18024590号-1