logo

SCIENCE CHINA Information Sciences, Volume 64 , Issue 5 : 159205(2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-019-2655-y

Exponential stability of discrete-time positive switched T-S fuzzy systems with all unstable subsystems

More info
  • ReceivedJul 7, 2019
  • AcceptedSep 2, 2019
  • PublishedMay 20, 2020

Abstract

There is no abstract available for this article.


Acknowledgment

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61873014).


Supplement

Appendixes A–D.


References

[1] Li M M, Deng F Q, Mao X R. Basic theory and stability analysis for neutral stochastic functional differential equations with pure jumps. Sci China Inf Sci, 2019, 62: 012204 CrossRef Google Scholar

[2] Takagi T, Sugeno M. Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, 1985, SMC-15: 116-132 CrossRef Google Scholar

[3] Wang Y Y, Shen H, Karimi H R. Dissipativity-Based Fuzzy Integral Sliding Mode Control of Continuous-Time T-S Fuzzy Systems. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst, 2018, 26: 1164-1176 CrossRef Google Scholar

[4] Li S Q, Deng F Q, Zhao X Y. A new perspective on fuzzy control of the stochastic T-S fuzzy systems with sampled-data. Sci China Inf Sci, 2019, 62: 209203 CrossRef Google Scholar

[5] Zhang H G, Han J, Wang Y C. Sensor Fault Estimation of Switched Fuzzy Systems with Unknown Input. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst, 2017, : 1-1 CrossRef Google Scholar

[6] Li S, Xiang Z R, Guo J. Int J Syst Sci, 2018, 49: 1226-1241 CrossRef Google Scholar

[7] Du S L, Qiao J F. Stability analysis and L1-gain controller synthesis of switched positive T-S fuzzy systems with time-varying delays. Neurocomputing, 2018, 275: 2616-2623 CrossRef Google Scholar

[8] Zhao X D, Yin Y F, Zhang L X. Control of Switched Nonlinear Systems via T-S Fuzzy Modeling. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst, 2016, 24: 235-241 CrossRef Google Scholar

[9] Fei Z Y, Shi S, Wang T. Improved Stability Criteria for Discrete-Time Switched T-S Fuzzy Systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst, 2018, : 1-9 CrossRef Google Scholar

  • Table 1   Comparison between Theorem 3 in [9] and Theorem with ${\kappa_1~}_{\min~}=1$,${\kappa_2~}_{\min~}=1$
    ParameterTheorem 3 in [9] Theorem 1
    $\lambda_{1}$ 4.8 3
    $\lambda_{2}$ 54.7
    $\mu_1$0.160.17
    $\mu_2$0.16 0.17
    $\kappa_{1a}^*$ 1.66 1.16
    $\kappa_{2a}^*$ 1.14 1.10