logo

Journals Books
Advanced Search
Sign in Register

中文

SCIENTIA SINICA Informationis
Download PDF
SCIENTIA SINICA Informationis, Volume 47 , Issue 4 : 428-441(2017) https://doi.org/10.1360/N112016-00172

Spherical parameterization based on planar ARAP+ method

Zhao WANG 1, Jielin ZHANG 1,3, Zhongxuan LUO 1,2,*
More info
  • ReceivedJul 14, 2016
  • AcceptedNov 28, 2016
  • PublishedFeb 22, 2017
Previous Table of Contents Next
Share
Rating

Abstract


Funded by

国家自然科学基金(61432003,61572105,11171052,61328206)


Acknowledgment

我们特别感谢辽宁师范大学的亓万锋 博士和大连理工大学的孟兆良老师在本文研究过程 中提出的许多宝贵意见, 同时还要衷心感谢以色列理工学院的 Emil Saucan 教授和纽约州立大学的顾险峰教授与我们保持密切的科研合作.

  • Click to view Download high-quality image

    Figure 1

    (Color online) The five types of spherical parameterization. (a) Convex; (b) ARAP $^{[4]}$; (c) BLD [9]; (d) our conformal; (e) our isometric

  • Click to view Download high-quality image

    Figure 2

    (Color online) Original mesh and initial parameterization

  • Click to view Download high-quality image

    Figure 3

    The processing of the local 1-ring neighborhood. (a) Local flattening of original mesh;(b) local optimization;(c) local flattening of initial mesh;(d) global solution;(e) spherical projection;(f) spherical parameterization

  • Click to view Download high-quality image

    Figure 4

    (Color online) The iterative results produced by our method. (a) Original mesh; (b) 1 iteration; (c) 2 iterations; (d) 3 iterations

  • Click to view Download high-quality image

    Figure 5

    (Color online) The post-processing result. (a) Original mesh; (b) before processing; (c) after processing

  • Click to view Download high-quality image

    Figure 6

    (Color online) The spherical parameterization and texture mapping. (a) Our conformal; (b) our isometric; mbox(c) our authalic

  • Click to view Download high-quality image

    Figure 7

    (Color online) The numerical convergence. (a) Our conformal; (b) our isometric; (c) our authalic

  • Click to view Download high-quality image

    Figure 8

    (Color online) Texture mapping of the multi-boundary model. (a) Original mesh; (b) planar parameterization; (c) planar texture mapping; (d) spherical parameterization; (e) cube; (f) spherical texture mapping

  • Click to view Download high-quality image

    Figure 9

    (Color online) Comparison of spherical parameterization (ARAP: the first and third rows of (a)–(c); ARAP+: the second and fourth rows of (a)–(c)) and texture mapping of ARAP and ARAP+. (a) 1 iteration; (b) 2 iteration; (c) 3 iteration; (d) texture mapping of ARAP; (e) texture mapping of ARAP+

  • Click to view Download high-quality image

    Figure 10

    (Color online) Comparison of spherical parameterization and texture mapping. (a) Convex; (b) ARAP; mbox(c) our conformal;d) our isometric; (e) our authalic

  • Click to view Download high-quality image

    Figure 11

    (Color online) The processing of high-curvature model. (a) Original mesh;(b) our conformal; (c) our isometric; (d) our authalic

  •   

    Algorithm 1 基于平面 ARAP+ 方法的球面参数化算法

    Require:A 3D mesh $S$;

    Output:A spherical mesh $S^{\ast}$;

    $S^*=S_0^*$; // 初始化ŁOOP

    for $i = 1 : n$

    // 局部优化

    $\omega_{i,j}$ $\Leftarrow$ ComputeWeights(RingNodes($p_i$));

    RingNodes($p^{\prime}_i$) $\Leftarrow$ ComputeWeights(RingNodes($p_i$));

    RingNodes($q^{\prime}_i$) $\Leftarrow$ ComputeWeights(RingNodes($q_i$));

    $L_{(i,j,j+1)}$ $\Leftarrow$ FittingMatrix($\triangle p^{\prime}_ip^{\prime}_jp^{\prime}_{j+1}$, $\triangle q^{\prime}_iq^{\prime}_jq^{\prime}_{j+1}$);

    New($q^{\prime}_i$) $\Leftarrow$ Relocate2D($\triangle p^{\prime}_ip^{\prime}_jp^{\prime}_{j+1}$, $\triangle q^{\prime}_iq^{\prime}_jq^{\prime}_{j+1}$);

    $\widetilde{\omega}_{i,j}$ $\Leftarrow$ MeanValue(RingNodes(New($q^{\prime}_i$)));

    $q^{\prime\prime}_i$ $\Leftarrow$ Relocate3D($\widetilde{\omega}_{i,j}$,RingNodes($q_i$));

    $B_i$ $\Leftarrow$ MotionVector($q^{\prime\prime}_i$, $\widetilde{q}_i$);

    if $\|B_i\|<10^{-3}$, then

    $B_i=(0,0,0)$; // 后处理

    end if

    end for

    $S^*_1$ $\Leftarrow$ ComputePara($\omega$, $B_i$); // 全局求解

    if Iteration $<$ 5, then

    $S^*_0=S^*_1$;

    else

    $S^*=S^*_0$;

    break;

    end if

    ENDLOOP

  • Table 1   Comparison of the distortion measures and running time between planar ARAP and ARAP+
    Method $n$ Child tiny (V:6368, F:12732) Skull tiny (V:5007, F:10010)
    Angle Area Rigidity Time (s) Angle Area Rigidity Time (s)
    1 2.28 6.42 2.93 10.66 2.03 5.65 1.59 6.84
    ARAP 2 2.52 6.23 2.85 21.69 2.11 4.89 1.58 13.85
    3 3.41 5.75 2.79 32.45 2.15 3.84 1.56 21.30
    1 2.24 6.13 2.89 10.62 2.02 5.19 1.57 6.91
    ARAP+ 2 2.45 5.69 2.82 21.59 2.05 4.52 1.55 13.95
    3 3.26 5.09 2.75 32.39 2.13 3.5 1.53 21.43
  • Table 2   The comparison of five methods on the distortion measures and running time
    Method Man tiny (V:5785, F:11566) Girl tiny (V:6610, F:13216)
    Angle Area Rigidity Time (s) Angle Area Rigidity Time (s)
    Convex 2.13 9.45 2.35 16.2 2.03 9.11 2.68 17.3
    ARAP 2.31 3.63 1.73 20.4 2.34 4.04 2.15 22.4
    Our conformal 2.07 9.61 2.16 17.4 2.01 7.65 2.73 19.1
    Our isometric 2.29 3.54 1.63 17.1 2.15 3.71 1.93 18.6
    Our authalic 2.94 3.46 4.04 19.6 2.81 3.41 4.55 21.5
    Method Kitten tiny (V:10200, F:20396) Canonical tiny (V:2243, F:4482)
    Angle Area Rigidity Time (s) Angle Area Rigidity Time (s)
    Convex 2.11 3.37 0.82 63.9 2.01 4.65 2.14 2.9
    ARAP 2.15 2.62 0.58 72.1 2.11 3.35 1.65 4.8
    Our conformal 2.03 3.65 0.86 67.7 1.98 4.59 2.12 3.4
    Our isometric 2.12 2.56 0.54 66.4 2.09 3.32 1.61 3.2
    Our authalic 2.54 2.51 1.47 70.2 3.34 3.29 2.51 4.3